Royal Rumble vs. Hell in a Cell

[Guest Hitlist]

Sorry for the bland topic, but I need some good opinions from a credible site, here. I need statistics on this for a debate I'm doing on IGN. All votes and feedback is appreciated. Thanks

[Guest *KNK*]

Royal Rumble is by far more prestigious because it's an once a year event that is always popular with the fans, even if it's usually blatantly obvious most of the time.

 

HIAC is just another gimmick blowoff match.

[Guest Hitlist]

Royal Rumble is by far more prestigious because it's an once a year event that is always popular with the fans, even if it's usually blatantly obvious most of the time.

 

HIAC is just another gimmick blowoff match.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

HIAC is also only done once a year, as well, am I right? Meh. I'm not going to try and sway the votes.

[Guest Hitlist]

Ah, crap. I guess I'm losing this one. Oh well, I guess I just won't use this info for my debate.

[alfdogg 0]

You mean you were only going to use it if the majority agreed with you?

[Scroby 0]

I'm sorry but this is a joke right? I mean can you really believe that something that gets you a title shot at Wrestlemania is the same or should be compared to a hell in a cell match? These are two completely differant matches, you shouldn't even be asking this.

[razazteca 0]

I would vote for a ladder match over Hell in a Cell match.

[Krankor 0]

The Royal Rumble is by far bigger victory for a wrestler than just a Hellin a Cell match. I would even say the Elminiation Chamber is a bigger win the a Hell in a Cell match.

[Guest Fook]

Ah, crap.  I guess I'm losing this one.  Oh well, I guess I just won't use this info for my debate.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

If you're only going to use data you agree with, why even bother collecting any?

 

Just make up the numbers then, it'll be about as legit as what you're doing now.