Guest New Jake Posted November 9, 2005 Report Posted November 9, 2005 NewJake, you're worse than the old one. Seriously. "Benoit.... 2nd rate Bret Hart". Do you even THINK before you type? Tell me why Benoit is a second rate Bret Hart. For one, Benoit was probably better than Bret Hart (though I'm not the one to argue that as I love them both), but, in terms of their character, they're not very similar, if that's the comparison you're trying to make. But hey, they're Canadian, and they're "technical wrestlers" so let's just lump 'em together. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Damn it dude, I meant that respectively. Benoit is the Bret Hart of this generation with the exception that he has not much WWE history to back up his legacy compared to Harts. Think before you type.
naiwf Posted November 9, 2005 Report Posted November 9, 2005 NewJake, you're worse than the old one. Seriously. "Benoit.... 2nd rate Bret Hart". Do you even THINK before you type? Tell me why Benoit is a second rate Bret Hart. For one, Benoit was probably better than Bret Hart (though I'm not the one to argue that as I love them both), but, in terms of their character, they're not very similar, if that's the comparison you're trying to make. But hey, they're Canadian, and they're "technical wrestlers" so let's just lump 'em together. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Damn it dude, I meant that respectively. Benoit is the Bret Hart of this generation with the exception that he has not much WWE history to back up his legacy compared to Harts. Think before you type. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 2nd rate is NEVER a compliment. It by definition implies you're not on the same level as anything that would be considered good or "first rate". Tell anyone you think they're second rate and see what happens. What I think you meant to say is the second coming. Your choice of words was awful if you meant that in a respectful way.
Lil' Bitch Posted November 10, 2005 Report Posted November 10, 2005 Batista / Undertaker for Mania would be awesome if they couldn't book Batista / Lesnar or Benoit / Undertaker
naiwf Posted November 10, 2005 Report Posted November 10, 2005 Batista / Undertaker for Mania would be awesome if they couldn't book Batista / Lesnar or Benoit / Undertaker <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, no it wouldn't. Either you waste Taker's streak on Batista who is almost as old as he is, or you waste Batista's first significant loss in forever on a guy who doesn't need the rub. It would be even WORSE if it was for the title.
alfdogg Posted November 10, 2005 Author Report Posted November 10, 2005 They should have done it at SummerSlam.
Guest New Jake Posted November 10, 2005 Report Posted November 10, 2005 Batista / Undertaker for Mania would be awesome if they couldn't book Batista / Lesnar or Benoit / Undertaker <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, no it wouldn't. Either you waste Taker's streak on Batista who is almost as old as he is, or you waste Batista's first significant loss in forever on a guy who doesn't need the rub. It would be even WORSE if it was for the title. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Batista has lost cleanly before. But yes, it's an aweful idea.
hyperchord24 Posted November 10, 2005 Report Posted November 10, 2005 Now how are they gonna do the edge/bischoff feud? Edge and batista are legitimately hurt and if batista can't wrestle, where does that leave edge?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now