Precious Roy Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 If you need 3's, steals and blocks take Wallace, he hits 2 3's a night along with over a block and a steal, one of the few guys that contributes in all three of those categorys. He's also shooting better from the field. If you're set in all those categorys and just need points and rebounds keep Webber, but Wallace is way more versatile and still gives you 15-7, and pts/rbds are the easist categorys to fill. Plus Webber is a constant injury risk. I think it's a no-brainer to take the offer. I wonder what drug(s) Chris Anderson is on? I'm thinking it's gotta be coke.
alfdogg Posted January 29, 2006 Author Report Posted January 29, 2006 Dammit, I was hoping 909 would say Webber. We could have worked something out in the TSM league. But yeah, in my leagues I'd take Wallace without a second thought if it was straight up.
Guest Posted January 29, 2006 Report Posted January 29, 2006 I've depended on Wallace for so much that he's won me over. When we had the draft, I thought I was making a huge mistake by drafting him, thankfully it wasn't.
Kurt Angle Mark Posted January 29, 2006 Report Posted January 29, 2006 Five Straight Wins fo the Clippers!!! They destroy the Nuggets again 112-79 Now a six game Eastern Conference road trip awaits
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now