BIG RUMOR on "One Night Stand 2" from WON !!

[Guest nokia]

Don't read if you don't want to know the possible outcome of 2 mania matches !!

 

 

 

 

 

You've been Warned !!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Meltzer mentioned on WOL that the current big rumor for the ECW PPV is RVD-Trips"

 

* This could be the MARK OUT moment of the year !!

[Guest Coffey]

Why would Triple H be on an ECW show?

[MillenniumMan831 0]

To destroy ECW of course.

 

Why isn't this in the ECW: ONS2 thread?

[Youth N Asia 0]

And why is there a One Night Stand 2? The wordplay doesn't match up.

[daileyxplanet 0]

Because he's going to be challenged by RVD for his Money in the Bank.

[Guest Dam(o)nYankees]

Why would he be there to be challenged?

[jester 0]

The masterplan:

 

1. HHH talks shits about ECW and what a loser promotion it was.

 

2. Along comes RVD to... mention what an awesome guy HHH is.

 

3. HHH wrestles a match that doesn't suit RVD's style and totally exposes him.

 

4. HHH beats RVD at ONS2, to prove he was right about everything.

 

Have I missed anything?

[Bruce Blank 0]

And why is there a One Night Stand 2? The wordplay doesn't match up.

Alright that comment has been made before and before.

 

you know it is possible to have two one night stands right? even with the same woman and all (to keep up the analogy) I mean picture this - you meet a chick have a one night stand

 

then a year later she comes along again, she's a little older, a little less attractive to most guys but you're desperate cause you just can't seem to connect with the really fine looking women

 

so you have another one night stand with her.

 

One Night Stand 2

 

and I think you'll find that analogy very fitting of this situation too

[daileyxplanet 0]

Why would he be there to be challenged?

 

Probably will be challenged before the event.

[chaosrage 0]

The masterplan:

 

1. HHH talks shits about ECW and what a loser promotion it was.

 

2. Along comes RVD to... mention what an awesome guy HHH is.

 

3. HHH wrestles a match that doesn't suit RVD's style and totally exposes him.

 

4. HHH beats RVD at ONS2, to prove he was right about everything.

 

Have I missed anything?

 

You left out the part where HHH takes his first Van Terminator.

 

Seriously, this match should only take place if RVD wins the title here. If not, it's a waste because RVD won't be able to go all out unless he's against an ECW guy, and no one there that night will want to see RVD have a WWE style match. They could just have RVD/HHH on a Raw instead. However if he is winning, then it's a great idea.

 

The reasons why he could possibly win:

 

1. RVD has made comments recently that HHH is his favorite wrestler.

2. HHH wants to catch up to Flair's number of title reigns.

[2GOLD 0]

I still think it's an incredibly horrible idea. RVD should win it on a big PPV with a huge crowd cheering on his three count. Not this show.

 

To me, Summerslam is when RVD should take the title. Not ONS 2.

[chaosrage 0]

I still think it's an incredibly horrible idea. RVD should win it on a big PPV with a huge crowd cheering on his three count. Not this show.

 

To me, Summerslam is when RVD should take the title. Not ONS 2.

 

But ONS 2 is his crowd. I really think he would prefer to win it at ONS 2 than at Wrestlemania.

[MillenniumMan831 0]

My guess --- RVD blows the Money in the Bank match but still has a mini-feud w/ HHH which creates a non-title match w/ HHH that RVD will win w/ help from 1/2 the ECW roster . . . or he gets the title match which ends in a big shmozz.

[cabbageboy 0]

This is exactly the scenario I had envisioned and they would be retards to not do this.

 

Millennium, since it's an ECW PPV I really doubt it'd go off the air with a schmozz finish. Particularly in a highly anticipated title match. And yes, it's easy enough to set this up. RVD has the MITB, they announce the ECW PPV, HHH runs his mouth with "Last year I was silent on this ECW crap, why are we doing it again?" and then RVD challenges him. It has to happen ahead of time since HHH wouldn't be there otherwise.

 

Thing is, if they do this they absolutely CANNOT job RVD out again to HHH. He flat out 100% must win here. I don't care if HHH simply regains it at SS but he cannot job at the ECW PPV. In fact I think Heyman would tell them to fuck off and would quit rather than book that.

 

This year alone HHH has sorta eliminated RVD from the Rumble (Rey was involved there too) and of course beat him in the tourney finals. He can't do one job to RVD in an ECW environment where it can be played off as "Rob, you got lucky in front of your ECW mutants, but in a WWE ring you can't beat me."

[Kahran Ramsus 0]

SPOILER:

Triple H goes over with the Pedigree.

[LivingLegendGaryColeman 0]

I have a feeling this will counteract even last year's ONS.

 

The show will end with Triple H giving the Pedigree to the whole lockerroom one by one. Eventually they will all just wait in a line. In the end, he'll be standing above all the ECW wrestlers and spray his kingly water into the air as the show closes and ECW is officially dead.

[daileyxplanet 0]

It's not a spoiler if everyone knows.

[2GOLD 0]

The way everyone is talking is it would be totally ok for RVD to win the title on the ECW sham PPV and then get his ass kicked on one of the biggest PPV stages. Sorry, I'd rather see RVD destroy HHH on the ECW PPV in a non-title, no match situation that leads up to a WWE big PPV where RVD can win it.

 

RVD finally winning a belt and getting a one month cheap reign that gives Trips the chance to go, "see, you couldn't handle the pressure on the big stage" is moronic and does nothing but damage RVD.

[buffybeast 0]

My guess --- RVD blows the Money in the Bank match but still has a mini-feud w/ HHH which creates a non-title match w/ HHH that RVD will win w/ help from 1/2 the ECW roster . . . or he gets the title match which ends in a big shmozz.

 

RVD needs half the ECW roster to beat one man? WTF? Oh, he will be facing the unstoppable HHH. He'll probably need the entire roster, then.

[Guest burth179]

I agree. The WWE title should not defended on an ECW show.

 

Are you guys 100% convinced that RVD even is winning the MIB match? I think all signs point to one last run at the title for the Nature Boy to be honest.

 

Just because RVD Trips is scheduled for One Night Stand (if that is even the case but I'll take Meltzer's word) doesn't mean the title is involved, does it? Or did he specifically say it was going to be a title match?

 

They could easily just bill RVD as "the face of ECW" and Trips as "the face of WWE" and have a match at One Night Stand.

 

And RVD should win at an ECW PPV, you would think at least.

[MillenniumMan831 0]

My guess --- RVD blows the Money in the Bank match but still has a mini-feud w/ HHH which creates a non-title match w/ HHH that RVD will win w/ help from 1/2 the ECW roster . . . or he gets the title match which ends in a big shmozz.

 

RVD needs half the ECW roster to beat one man? WTF? Oh, he will be facing the unstoppable HHH. He'll probably need the entire roster, then.

 

Think Kid Kash's TV Title win over Rhino. Same thing.

[Cheech Tremendous 0]

It really bothers me that Meltzer makes an off-the-cuff comment on his radio show and it immediately gets turned around into "Meltz confirms HHH-RVD at One Night Stand." If anyone was actually listening to the show, he just said that it makes sense to do HHH-RVD at ONS and that he wouldn't be surprised if that was the way they went.

[Art Sandusky 0]

But how in the hell does that even make sense?

[Cheech Tremendous 0]

A caller asked how WWE could put on a decent ECW show with Sabu, the Dudleys, Raven, etc. not working the show. Meltzer said they would probably go with HHH-RVD because it is the only logical match that could draw.

 

It's not like its a spoiler or a sure thing, but since it writes itself and its what people want to see, the WWE probably won't do it.

[GreatWhiteNope 0]

They'll probably make it a Three Way Dance with Terry Funk, that way HHH doesn't have to put RVD over.

[Lt. Al Giardello 0]

I still think it's an incredibly horrible idea. RVD should win it on a big PPV with a huge crowd cheering on his three count. Not this show.

 

To me, Summerslam is when RVD should take the title. Not ONS 2.

 

Are you smoking crack?

 

RVD winning the World Title on a ECW PPV infront of ECW FANS CHEERING HIM ON, means more then him just winning on a regular WWE PPV.

[Black Lushus 0]

are YOU smoking crack? Summerslam would get more buys if the possibility of RVD winning is out there. Not to mention it'd be held in a bigger arena meaning more ticket sales. Summerslam IS the 2nd biggest WWE PPV.

[GreatWhiteNope 0]

RVD winning the World Title on a ECW PPV infront of ECW FANS CHEERING HIM ON, means more then him just winning on a regular WWE PPV.

 

Not to mention HHH in front of several thousand smarks = InstaHeat

[Cheech Tremendous 0]

A Summerslam match between RVD and HHH doesn't mean as much as it would at ONS. RVD is ECW. He is the poster boy and he's the one that is carrying on the tradition. If he won the belt, by beating HHH at the Hammerstein Ballroom, in front of ECW fans and alumni, it would be one of the biggest markout moments and pops you will ever see. A SS match would be just another HHH defense. How can you fail to see that?

[Lt. Al Giardello 0]

are YOU smoking crack? Summerslam would get more buys if the possibility of RVD winning is out there. Not to mention it'd be held in a bigger arena meaning more ticket sales. Summerslam IS the 2nd biggest WWE PPV.

 

Considering ECW ONS did an amazing buyrate last year, the numbers will increase with the idea of RVD winning the world title. And the only reason Summerslam had a high buyrate last year was only because of HBK/Hogan.

 

RVD winning the title on a ECW PPV, in a ECW arena, infront of ECW fans(Smark fans, the heat for HHH will be amazing), that's a moment that will be mentioned for ages, RVD winning the title on a regular PPV, just seems another moment.