NFL Week 2

[UZI Suicide 0]

Chicago blew out Detroit last year in Week 2 also.

[randomguy 0]

Awesome catch by Chambers.

[Guest Felonies!]

Chicago blew out Detroit last year in Week 2 also.

Why do you hate America Chicago?

[CanadianChris 0]

Dammit turnover on downs......they should've punted it and pinned the Giants deep.

They were too deep. Too often you'll get only a net 18 yard punt, which is pretty bad, considering you'll pick up 4th and 1 a good percentage of the time.

[Annabelle 0]

loaded glove is hard headed. stubborn. and inept.

[Guest]

I didn't know that the Bears made the NFC title game last year. Loaded Glove is right though, there isn't any "strong" or "clear" favorite to win either conference. Not at this point, anyway.

[Annabelle 0]

I didn't know that the Bears made the NFC title game last year.

 

do you watch football?

[UZI Suicide 0]

why are we having such a difficulty with the word favorite. i think its fairly subjective anyway. its not the gospel word. the colts have been called the favorites of the afc. were last year, too. doesn't mean shit. why is loaded glove having such difficulty with this?

 

I'm not having any difficulty with it at all, I just think it's stupid to pick a favorite after two weeks and then totally disregard all the other teams in the conference.

 

What I am having difficulty with is your dumbass reasoning.

 

"Team A beat Team B worse than Team C beat them, so Team A is clearly better"

 

no.

 

bears offense last year = weak with horrible qb.

bears defense last year = amazing.

bears = nfc championship game.

 

----

 

bears offense this year = much improved with healthy qb.

bears defense = amazing.

bears = strong favorites to win nfc championship.

 

 

not all that hard. no bullshit reasoning.

 

Hey, their offense will probably improve, but like I said above they did this against Detriot last year too.

 

I'm not ready to put them above Carolina or Seattle yet, or even Atlanta. I'd like to see them beat Seattle.

[Guest Felonies!]

I don't get why people are shitting on the Bears. If, ceteris paribus, you go from the worst quarterback in football to a very good one, shouldn't they be a contender?

[Guest]

I didn't know that the Bears made the NFC title game last year.

 

do you watch football?

Fool, the Panthers played the Bears for the NFC title.

 

Also, nobody shit on the Bears at all. They are a contender. Nobody is a clear favorite two games into the season.

[Annabelle 0]

I don't get why people are shitting on the Bears. If, ceteris paribus, you go from the worst quarterback in football to a very good one, shouldn't they be a contender?

 

exactly. especially when they almost made it to the superbowl with that combination.

 

and people explain your rationale, aside from favoritism, of putting the atlanta falcons (who didn't make the playoffs last year) over the chicago bears? please loaded glove. you are the expert. explian it to poor old me.

[Guest Felonies!]

I didn't know that the Bears made the NFC title game last year.

 

do you watch football?

Fool, the Panthers played the Bears for the NFC title.

 

Also, nobody shit on the Bears at all. They are a contender.

Bears lost to the Panthers in the second round, Panthers lost to the Seahawks in the title game. There.

[Guest]

I was typing so fast that I accidentally put Bears instead of Seahawks.

[Annabelle 0]

I didn't know that the Bears made the NFC title game last year.

 

do you watch football?

Fool, the Panthers played the Bears for the NFC title.

 

Also, nobody shit on the Bears at all. They are a contender.

Bears lost to the Panthers in the second round, Panthers lost to the Seahawks in the title game. There.

 

oh ya.

[Vampiro69 0]

I thought that the NFC title game was the Seahawks vs the Panthers.

[Slayer 0]

Where the hell is the crowd in Miami? It looks even worse than a Marlins game there

 

EDIT: n/m, didn't see the game clock

[Annabelle 0]

I thought that the NFC title game was the Seahawks vs the Panthers.

 

it was.

[CanadianChris 0]

And Miami is 0-2. Wow.

[UZI Suicide 0]

Nice TD pass by the Saints.

[CanadianGuitarist 0]

I think Gus Johnson's favourite word is "decapitated." He loves saying it so much.

 

I thought I was the only one who noticed.

[UseTheSledgehammerUh 0]

Thank God the Giants look awful today, because Philly's offense just took the 2nd half of the game off, the opposite of last week's effort.

[Annabelle 0]

I don't get why people are shitting on the Bears. If, ceteris paribus, you go from the worst quarterback in football to a very good one, shouldn't they be a contender?

 

and people explain your rationale, aside from favoritism, of putting the atlanta falcons (who didn't make the playoffs last year) over the chicago bears? please loaded glove. you are the expert. explian it to poor old me.

 

well?

[strummer 0]

how the hell are the Giants only down 3 points? LOL

[Guest]

Well, the Saints won.

[mike546 0]

And there STILL in this game.

 

I fucking hate this team. They play with my emotions way too much.

[Hawk 34 0]

The Bears were good last year and have obviously improved with a QB with considerably greater range of ability then the scrub they had last season...so what's the problem? They match the requirements to be labeled a SB contender.

 

If idiots were going around calling MIAMI, a SB contender, why the hell is it an issue with Chicago, who are actually justified in the hype.

 

Chicago is a legitimate contender for the NFC title, alongside other teams.

 

This is nothing more then starting a stupid debate for the sake of saying something different from reality.

 

Lost in all this "Chicago is/isnt a contender", "Oakland blows" talk is that Cleveland is horrible and got blown out despite constant chances to stay alive.

[Annabelle 0]

mcnabb showing everyone exactly what the problem is with mcnabb. horsing around. doesn't have the killer instinct to finish the other team off.

[UZI Suicide 0]

I don't get why people are shitting on the Bears. If, ceteris paribus, you go from the worst quarterback in football to a very good one, shouldn't they be a contender?

 

exactly. especially when they almost made it to the superbowl with that combination.

 

and people explain your rationale, aside from favoritism, of putting the atlanta falcons (who didn't make the playoffs last year) over the chicago bears? please loaded glove. you are the expert. explian it to poor old me.

 

Who cares who made the playoffs last year? Chicago didn't make the playoffs in 2004, but they got there last year.

 

Atlanta has looked really impressive so far, as they've already defeated two playoff teams from last season (and from their own divison, no less). I don't put them above Chicago though, if I said that before it was a typo, I think they're on about the same level right now.

[randomguy 0]

So many teams have such awful clock management abilities. Snapping the ball with 9 seconds on the play clock?

[Annabelle 0]

ok. as long as you don't put the falcons ABOVE the bears. that would be silly.