Anti-Abortion Lobby to Waste More Time with Empty Gesture

[SuperJerk 0]

GOP wants law to define when fetuses feel pain

 

WASHINGTON (AP) -- While they still can, House Republicans are looking at scheduling a vote next week on a fetal pain abortion bill in a parting shot at incoming majority Democrats and a last bid for loyalty from the GOP's base of social conservatives.

 

The measure is tentatively on House GOP leaders' list of bills to be considered in a lame-duck session before Democrats assume control of Congress. It has no chance of passing the Senate during the waning days of Republican control. But, with Democrats ascending to agenda-setting roles, passage isn't the point, said one conservative leader.

 

"Next year, the leadership of the House will be hardcore pro-abortion loyalists," said Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee. "They will block votes on even modest pro-life measures like this one."

 

The vote would be the first on the measure, which was introduced in September and referred to a health subcommittee, where no action on it was taken. Johnson said his group wants a House vote to test support for the measure.

 

The bill, by Rep. Chris Smith, R-New Jersey, defines a 20-week-old fetus as a "pain-capable unborn child" -- a highly controversial threshold among scientists. It also directs the Health and Human Services Department to develop a brochure stating "that there is substantial evidence that the process of being killed in an abortion will cause the unborn child pain."

 

Abortion providers would be required to inform the mothers that evidence exists that the procedure would cause pain to the child and offer the mothers anesthesia for the baby. The mothers would accept or reject the anesthesia by signing a form. The bill allows for an exception for certified medical emergencies.

 

When fetuses can feel pain -- versus a reflexive drawing back from stimuli -- has been the subject of heated debate. Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco last year reviewed dozens of studies and medical reports and said that fetuses likely are incapable of feeling pain until around the seventh month of pregnancy, when they are about 28 weeks old.

 

That report hardly settled the issue for Johnson's group. The legislation would enshrine other evidence that fetuses "would experience great pain during abortions by 20 weeks," the Right to Life Committee said in a letter this week to House members.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/30/GOP...n.ap/index.html

 

Basically trying to guilt women into not get abortions during the second trimester. I don't agree wth their premise that life begins at conception, but I'm not really opposed to their desire to restrict abortion during the third trimester (which is perfectly in keeping with the Roe V. Wade decision). But, as if the decision isn't hard enough, now they want to throw in misinformation just to confuse things.

[snuffbox 0]

Between the huge spending, the Patriot Act, wished for federal-control of all wombs, and nation-building (among other things)...can anyone argue that the Republican Party has not become the home for Big Govt?

[NoCalMike 0]

Dissapointing, but far from suprising. I mean wow, the Republicans not wanting to talk about the bigger issues of the day....SHOCKING!

[Dobbs 3K 0]

I hate the fact that abortion exists, but I think most people accept that it's never going to be completely illegal in the US. This bill won't really do anything even if it does magically pass.