Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted September 19, 2007 Even if NE doesn't show up for the game I just can't see them losing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted September 19, 2007 Man that would be great if Buffalo pulled off the upset. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaMarka 0 Report post Posted September 19, 2007 I'm backing Cincinnati, for all the reasons listed. I can't in any way or form see the Bengals not smash the Browns into paste. We're talking a team that just HUMBLED the Raven's Offense, against a team that was humiliated by the Steelers. No-brainer to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted September 19, 2007 I'm backing Cincinnati, for all the reasons listed. I can't in any way or form see the Bengals not smash the Browns into paste. We're talking a team that just HUMBLED the Raven's Offense, against a team that was humiliated by the Steelers. No-brainer to me. Cincinnati was on the road, and the Ravens don't have an offence to be humbled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted September 19, 2007 The Bills have been known to upset New England. Sure Belichick's boys looked impressive the past couple weeks- the way the NFL goes, who knows if they'll get whooped at home all of a sudden to Buffalo. Not likely, but possible. Tom Brady has never lost to the Bills in Foxboro in his career. Based on what I've seen, I wouldn't call Denver a lock against any team on their schedule besides Kansas City. That's why I said almost. But Jacksonville is still an east coast team travelling west to face a superior non-divisional rival. Those types of games are among the safest you can pick. With the Buffalo game it was the reverse, the western team travelling east which is always a cause for concern (and Denver has a tendency to come out of the gate sleeping as well). Last game against Oakland is the classic example of why picking any divisional game is dangerous unless it is late in the year and one team has simply given up. Not that I think Buffalo is going to win, but any time you are playing within the same division an upset can happen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaMarka 0 Report post Posted September 19, 2007 So I guess Matt Runnels posts here. Matt Runnels: I had a stat question that wasn’t in the book but came up on another website regarding survival football pick’em. Are upsets/close games more likely in interdivision games? (Some people want to take New England over Buffalo as a sure pick, while others are saying “NO, THEY’RE BOTH AFC EAST!”) So if New England played two teams that were roughly equal, but one was in the AFC East, would the AFC East team have a better shot due to playing each other twice a year/knowing each other better/hating each other more/etc…? Are you related to Dusty? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarvinisaLunatic 0 Report post Posted September 19, 2007 There's only one lock. And if people don't pick New England they have either already used them or they are on crack. Baltimore and Pittsburgh are locks. The Broncos are close to being a lock too. I Dont think Baltimore is a lock vs Arizona for the simple reason that McNair could start and not be 100% healthy and freaking fumble the ball 3 more times like he did vs Cincy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted September 19, 2007 The Broncos aren't locks. In fact, I say they'll lose Sunday. Pittsburgh better come through for me though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted September 19, 2007 The Broncos aren't locks. In fact, I say they'll lose Sunday. Pittsburgh better come through for me though. Edit: And I mean it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted September 23, 2007 Not as lopsided as I was expecting this week: New England - 9 Pittsburgh - 5 Baltimore - 2 Carolina - 1 New Orleans - 1 (WTF?) Washington - 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted September 23, 2007 Haha, the only one who picked Washington this week. Good. The rule this season is to bet mostly against Kansas City and New York. Minnesota was going to be my other pick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted September 23, 2007 Haha, the only one who picked Washington this week. Good. Yeah, I kinda wish there were more people on Washington this week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted September 23, 2007 Fucking Redskins. I hope the Packers crush them for this in a couple weeks at Lambeau. I took a gamble considering that I wanted to save New England or Indy for later. So much for that. I thought the Giants and Chiefs were worse than they really were. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted September 23, 2007 So after the chaos of Week 2, only one person is eliminated in Week 3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted September 24, 2007 4hartthreat still has to sweat out that New Orleans pick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawk 34 0 Report post Posted September 24, 2007 So after the chaos of Week 2, only one person is eliminated in Week 3. People took less risks this week, obviously since NE and Pitt pretty much took all the votes. I just avoid using Indy and NE as long as possible. Looking ahead at next week, I feel secure about only two games at this juncture. Neither involve NE and Indy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted September 24, 2007 4hartthreat still has to sweat out that New Orleans pick. LOL Oh yeah. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted September 24, 2007 So after the chaos of Week 2, only one person is eliminated in Week 3. People took less risks this week, obviously since NE and Pitt pretty much took all the votes. I just avoid using Indy and NE as long as possible. Looking ahead at next week, I feel secure about only two games at this juncture. Neither involve NE and Indy. Yeah, I'm probably looking at the same two games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alfdogg 0 Report post Posted September 24, 2007 I hate to waste my NE pick this soon, but that was the only game I was 100% confident about. I actually considered the Browns against Oakland, after their showing against Cincy last week. Good thing I didn't bite on that one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted September 24, 2007 The Broncos aren't locks. In fact, I say they'll lose Sunday Congratulations on that one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted September 25, 2007 I'm picking San Diego this week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted September 25, 2007 It's not so easy this time. I'm going to take Dallas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alfdogg 0 Report post Posted September 26, 2007 I went with San Diego, as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2007 Not quite a two-team week, but close: Dallas - 8 San Diego - 6 Baltimore - 1 Miami - 1 One person missed the deadline and is eliminated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawk 34 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2007 Who took Baltimore and why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2007 Well, the Browns suck, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted September 30, 2007 The better question is, who took Miami and why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarvinisaLunatic 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2007 Well, the team that used to be the Browns suck, right? edited Miami actually has a shot to win still Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted September 30, 2007 Doesn't make it any less of a bad pick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawk 34 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2007 It's not like he didn't have a couple LOCKS to choose from. He still had NE, Dallas, Pitt and Indy. I get trying to save the usual lock teams but not with Miami against a shifty team like Oakland. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites