Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 For those who want to.. Name major PPVs that wrestlers no sold that they could have or/and should have been on I'll start Wrestlemania III Jimmy Snuka Didn't happen
Guest Arnold_OldSchool Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 For those who want to.. Name major PPVs that wrestlers no sold that they could have or/and should have been on I'll start Wrestlemania III Jimmy Snuka Didn't happen Snuka was gone for over a year by that point and was headlining for the AWA aganist Col. Debeers and others Are you just naming people randomly? WM 3 The WWF didn't use Bruno, Demolition, Ron Bass, Kamala, Dan Spivey, BJ Mulligan, Paul Orndorff and a bunch of other mid carders who were legit on the roster
Guest Arnold_OldSchool Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Wrestlemania IX Jake the Snake! Explain your purpose or stop the stupidity
Some Guy Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Superstar Billy Graham was also at the show injecting Hogan with steroids and didn't appear on it. I really can't figure out what this topic is about. How does one no sell a PPV? If you mean "no show", as in guys who were advertised but didn't appear then I could probably come up with more. If you mean guys who were on the roster but not on a given PPV then there are too many to bother listing.
Guest Arnold_OldSchool Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Superstar Billy Graham was also at the show injecting Hogan with steroids and didn't appear on it. I really can't figure out what this topic is about. How does one no sell a PPV? If you mean "no show", as in guys who were advertised but didn't appear then I could probably come up with more. If you mean guys who were on the roster but not on a given PPV then there are too many to bother listing. Well the 2 examples he gave don't fit with either of what you propose , It seems he's just listing random wrestlers In that case Starcade 83-93 HULK H@G@N!! OMG!!!! Wrestlemania 1-7 RIC "WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" FLAIR OMG That so cool
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Random people who no sold that could or/and should have been at a PPV. Like Starrcade 97 Kevin Nash, Wrestlemania III Jimmy Snuka, Wrestlemania IX Jake the Snake. Yeah no show the PPV, how come no sell doesn't apply like no show does?
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Wrestlemania VI Ric Flair would have been good. TORONTO SKYDOME RIC FLAIR~! Well it did happen 12 years later..
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Just name people on/off roster who should have been on a PPV (if you want to..). Wrestlemania VIII King Kong Bundy could have fit.
Guest Arnold_OldSchool Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Random people who no sold that could or/and should have been at a PPV. Like Starrcade 97 Kevin Nash, Wrestlemania III Jimmy Snuka, Wrestlemania IX Jake the Snake. Yeah no show the PPV, how come no sell doesn't apply like no show does? SNUKA and Jake were working for the competetion!!!! They didn't no sell anything!!! If Vince thought they could have made him some $$$$ they would've been there Please never post again WM 4 KK Bundy was still on the roster...
Guest Arnold_OldSchool Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Okay *copies and pastes random PPV* *Names every other wrestler on the planet* Fuck this is fun!
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 What is wrong, why do you disagree with what I said about should/could?
Some Guy Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 And what would you propose that King Kong Bundy would have done at WM 8? This is really stupid. Yeah no show the PPV, how come no sell doesn't apply like no show does? Because they mean 2 different things. To "No sell" something (a move or an insult) is to act as though it did not happen. To "no show" an event is to not show up at an event.
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 I mean really should be on the PPV (even if they were in a different fed!). Not Wrestlemania 2000 Lex Luger, that would suck.
Guest LooneyTune Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 (rips balls off) This is more entertaining than trying to figure out the topic... (goes to the emergency room for hemerging)
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 I don't know, I was just thinking Wrestlemania VIII King Kong Bundy would have fit, he could have faced any mid card face (Bossman, Duggan, Virgil, etc).
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 OMG I have to explain everything to you guys to cause NO controversy (which is fine, just pointing something out).
iliketurtles Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Undertaker at No Mercy 2000? I guess...?
Some Guy Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 OK, maybe this would be morbidly entertaining if you would try to explain why you think certain guy should have been on certain shows. I'm dying to hear your booking plans for Bundy at WM 8. Weren't 4 WM matches enough for Bundy? I don't recall any of them being any good, unless you are a big fan of Hogan formula matches.
Guest Arnold_OldSchool Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Well then.... *Names every main eventer not in WWF* *Inserts all names into WM 1 line up* /enjoys the experience
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Wrestlemania X Undertaker would have been good/should have happened. Too bad he was out with the back/family/whatever issues!
Guest Shadow Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 fanofcoils has proven to be a moron on about 3 counts. Kevin Nash no-showing(literally DIDNT SHOW UP) is the most famous case since it was the BIGGEST show of the year and of the company's history and was advertised in a major match with The Giant. You can argue that HBK "no-showed" WM13 by faking the injury. numerous cases of no-showing for ECW shows.
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Yeah, Dibiase, Flair, Duggan (yes Duggan IMO, when he was even better), Savage, Roberts, wow, Wrestlemania I would have been awesome with them. In case anyone has forgotten I must do this.. If you are NOT interested in this topic, I'm not encouraging you to reply.
Some Guy Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 OMG I have to explain everything to you guys to cause NO controversy (which is fine, just pointing something out). It's not about controversy, it's about trying to figure out what you meant. When you just throw out random things like saying Bundy should have been on WM 8 with no explanation it doesn't make for a very clear and intelligent post. I'll play along with you on this if you provode more reasoning than "I just think he'd fit on the card." Wrestlemania X Undertaker would have been good/should have happened. Too bad he was out with the back/family/whatever issues! What are you talking about? Everybody knows that Yokozuna and his 10 thug friends killed him at RR 94. Back problems? That sounds pretty far fetched.
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Off topic: I was shocked/in joy/and pissed when I saw Summerslam 92 Roddy Piper! Which I didn't hear was in the show (so I was upset no one I read mentioned he was on the show because it does matter in some regard, Piper didn't no show Summerslam 92!)
Guest Shadow Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Wrestlemania X Undertaker would have been good/should have happened. Too bad he was out with the back/family/whatever issues! that's not no showing. that's being out of action due to injuries and family issues. Edge was hurt last year and wasn't on the card...is that no-showing? There's a difference in not being booked for a ppv while being on the roster where you'd have over 500 thousand cases and being booked just not showing to the arena be it on purpose, family emergency, travel issues or idiocy. (alot of famous stories about wrestlers no showing because of inability to FIND the venue).
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 That is fine if you disagree with my choices, I will happy provide for reasons why they should have been on the show.
Guest fanofcoils Posted March 25, 2005 Report Posted March 25, 2005 Wrestlemania VIII is a classic PPV, it has EVERYONE worthwhile at the time except Sting and Vader. I think King Kong Bundy would have fit, better than Wrestlemania XI King Kong Bundy, which was an obscure Wrestlemania to return to IMO.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now