Dr. Tyler; Captain America

Link to the torrent itself. I don't feel like reading through a poorly written right wing screedfest to find it.

Sooner or later, he'll realize that no one cares about your gimmick in the NFL.

The only reason I want Mike banned is so that I don't have to post in CE anymore.

Don't feel the need to defend yourself to Mike, haha. By the way, what happened to the Nemesis bashing? Get back on it.

I don't blame you. I'm having trouble stomaching it myself.

classics plz.

No one ever close this thread.

...wtf.

John Kerry, apparently.

Ew. Nader as a VP would be... ew. Not even sure I could vote for that.

I really have no interest in seeing it, so there's one in America.

Well golly, this looks like another album I'll be downloading just because I can.

Yeah, they're conservative in nature. And this shouldn't surprise people, either.

Yeah, that's a great response. This mock outrage over whatever the fuck you're bitching about is about the equivilant of one of the Democrats getting miffed if the same was done by the fucking Heritage Foundation. It's a terrible thing they did, but for the love of Christ, your hysterics make it sound like John Kerry himself ordered them NOT to do background checks. You're being ridiculous and using hyperbolic rhetoric for the sake of making people look "stupid". Just admit it and move on.

That's exactly what ACT is, which is what makes this thread so ridiculously absurd.

The point was because he gave a big F-You to the party by not seeking their nomination in the first place. If the Greens had nominated Nader again, even after he informed everyone that he doesn't wanna be a Green anymore, it would make the party more of a laughingstock than they already are (what, with the Debbs issue and all). Which becomes a fundamental difference of opinion. His overall vote strategy will fail miserably, but you think he's doing it because he'll get them, whereas I believe he's doing it because he wants more publicity. I can't argue with you on it because both are just opinions, so I'll leave it at that.

Depends if you're talking about nationally or worldwide. More like 1/3... check the article I posted. There actually has been a large anti-Nader revolt, specifically because of his attempt to distance himself from the party when they had virtually no one else with name ID. If Nader wanted to help the party, he could've started by grooming a candidate right after 2000. Instead, he chose to waffle and then run again himself, only this time choosing to fart on the Greens. I would call a good 2/3 of the Green party more than a "faction". And if they nominated a candidate with, effectively, Nader's beliefs (which they did; Cobb is a textbook Green, from what I've read), why would you vote for Nader and fuck over your own growing party? It doesn't make sense.

I'm sorry, when was John Kerry put in charge of Americans Coming Together?

Care to quote me on that, or are you just spewing irrelevant shit like always? To NCM: I couldn't care less about the whole "OMG NADER IS PULLING FROM KERRY ASSASINATE NOW!!!" movement. I simply find it absurd that these polling firms throw Nader in there to "spice up" their tickets, when he isn't even going to get on the ballots. He's running not out of any sense of loyalty to his supporters; at this point, he's running just to placate his ginormous ego. He's probably, at the same time, killed the only truly progressive party worth voting for in the process. Why are you even remotely sympathetic to the man? Also, re: write ins -- You can write someone in for President, yes. However, to my knowledge, there has never ever ever been a successful write-in campaign, and quite frankly, who the hell is gonna write in Nader other than a very, very select few? At that point, you're not voting for your ideology; you're voting for name ID.

Nader did that to himself. He's a fucking moron for running again after so many people blame him (whether it's true or not) for losing the election for Gore in 2000. He hurt the Green party indescribably by running again in 2004.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/26/...reut/index.html Nader failed to win the Green party nomination, and doubly failed by not getting enough delegates to vote "No Nominee" and allow state parties to nominate whomever they want. In effect, Ralph Nader probably won't be on more than 10 states' ballots come election time. The Green nominee, Cobb, has also pledged to only campaign in "safe states" in an attempt to avoid a 2000 repeat. Chris Bowers of MyDD has a more astute analysis of Nader's situation. So, the media can stop using Nader in the national Bush/Kerry polls any time now. He'll have no effect whatsoever in 2004.

Ban the second coming of Robstone, Nemesis, before it gets ugly

Stop talking, I was giving you more credit than you're earning now

My apologies, but that's painstakingly close to Howard "I'm just saying... it's an interesting theory!" Dean