Source: CBS NEWS OMG WTF BIAS
In the article, Richard Clarke, former chief of terrorism for Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II until he resigned two years ago, asserts (among other things) that his requests to focus on al Queda and bin Laden before 9/11 were ignored in favor of action against "Iraqi terrorism against the United States". Given that Clarke resigned (i.e. he wasn't fired) and has been a public servant for 30 years, this could spell much more trouble than the Paul O'Neill accusations (which were effectively dismissed as sour grapes). Considering Bush is running on National Security, this could be a serious dent in Bush's re-election campaign.
But hey, that might just be me. After all, I'm an EVIL LIBERAL PARTISAN LOL WHO WANTS TO BRING DOWN DA BUSH!
So, thoughts?