Dr. Tyler; Captain America

Do you think you could fill more posts with conjecture and retarded, inane questions?

It's actually about ~21% of the electorate. ~20% are Democrats, 21% are Republicans, and ~59% of the electorate are Independants. But yeah, insult my polysci knowledge, because I don't know shit. Insulting 20% of the population that isn't going to vote for you anyways in a NY newspaper that nobody outside of NYC reads is TERRIBLE!!! He'll be a HORRIBLE DNC CHAIRMAN, DESPITE ALL LOGIC!

You didn't explain anything. You just said "READ HIS RHETORIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" over and over again without citing a single example of something he's said during his campaign for the DNC chairmanship. Nor have you provided a single example of how his plans for the DNC would be a boon for the RNC, or vice versa. Really, you haven't proven anything either way. You've just wasted about four hours of your time banging your head against the wall and repeating the same thing about sixteen times, perhaps trying to convince yourself that it's true.

Are you seriously leaving it up to me to prove your argument, by the way?

"READ HIS RHETORIC", he screams.

Oy.

All Dean will do is take the CURRENT Democratic base and slash it down further. The GOP learned their lesson when Newt went overboard. -=Mike Is that in his platform?

Find me a quote, okay?

This isn't a spectacular challenge by the GENIUS!~

You said he's pledged to do more of the same, find me that quote, will you?

Find me that, please.

Roemer had absolutely no plans to reform anything within the party. He pledged no additional support to any of the state and local parties. He was the candidate of the status quo. Why in the fuck would Democrats want the status quo to continue?

Congratulations on not addressing my post! BTW, he's an intelligence analyst and you're a waiter. Just saying.

...?! He's a fucking junior senator from Illinois. What the hell do you expect from the guy? Reid is the MINORITY LEADER. Of COURSE he's gonna be the one to do the response. Mike, the staunch Democrat, knows exactly what the Democratic leadership is thinking about the last few elections. Who would you suggest? Maybe someone who has pledged to support state and local parties in red states?

You couldn't link us to the source, you couldn't tell us what page your quote was on. Something tells me that it wasn't your handiwork.

No, actually, you're paraphrasing someone else's argument, which used Schumer's quote. However, you've probably never read the document yourself, because you couldn't even find a fucking link to it.

What's funny is that most of the symptoms you've listed can be solved by good leadership -- i.e. real funding for smaller candidates in "red" states and other points I made in the original post you no-sold. However, your complete lack of any knowledge of political science is jading you from realizing that this country is divided enough that the smallest thing could swing the electorate.

No, you're paraphrasing an argument that someone else made without investigating it yourself.

Bitch, I'll kill you.

Actually, he's probably read this argument on a Republican blog and it's all been laid out for him. I doubt he knows what page it's on.

I wasn't being critical, I was more just stating fact. That's how they keep the party together nowadays since there's such a broad diversity within both parties.

Pork is becoming one of the only ways that a party in government can coalesce along party lines. Mr. DeLay and Mr. Hastert in the house, and Mr. Frist in the Senate are very good at ensuring votes by offering pork.

Link?

To be fair, you could replace "republicans" with "democrats" there too, and it'd also be true. However, the point remains that Mike's gross overassertion of conservative nature the Independant public is absolutely idiotic.