Downhome

Bah, I knew they were tapes, sorry for that type, heh. What's the match listing for the DVD? I'll get back to you soon.

What is the quality? I think I might get the Dragon Kid DVD. I really like that guy, but have seen very few of his matches. I might want Before They Were Superstars 2 also.

I was about to post the exact same thing.

People, just imagine how big Benoit could be if WWE only focused on the guy, and made him the focal point.

How long, and what is on, Ultimate Rey Misterio and Best of Dragon Kid?

Who is this guy with the big gold looking belt thing?

Ooooooooooooooooooo, almost as exciting as a Crybaby Match~!

Ah, if the world was really like this. "Well bob, let's not bet money tonight at the poker game. How about this, whoever wins gets to marry your girlfriend~! HAR HAR HAR" God I hate this.

Lita is going to join Kane, mark my words.

My God this sucks. Please, quit teasing us like this WWE!

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! I hate Edge, the crying whining little bitch.

I wish that Lita was lying about all of this, and she's actually working with Kane, and it's all a ploy to get Matt back for what he did to her all those months ago. Just anything to be able to end this early.

Oh shit, more of this "love story".

Well that was quick.

Well well well Mr. Dames. You just had to show up for the Diva contest, didn't ya?

Jesus Christ, this is the Regal that I love. Wow. Why is it again why they never hardly use the guy in a productive way?

Now mention HHH losing to Alex Wright!

"It was me sunshine!" That's great, long live Regal~!

But a film is more than visual. Someone could make a film and it could look like the best thing ever, but if everything else isn't there it'll still be a POS. I admitted the film looks good in places, but it doesn't make up for every single other aspect of the film. And pretty much every other aspect of the movie is poorly done, and anyone that knows film, knows that is a fact, and can not just be overlooked. Like I said though, I actually like some bad movies, but this isn't one I liked. Yes, you are more than mistaken on this one . The Day After Tomorrow is one of the biggest pieces of crap, top to bottom. Ugh, now THAT is my least favorite movie ever, EVER! While I hated both The Village and The Day After Tomorrow, they did entertain me, in that I laughed my ass all the way through both of them. I suppose that also counts as something, right? Like I said, the filmmaking process is not just what you see on the screen, it's not just the visuals. It's the writing, the acting, the direction, the lighting, everything, at least to me. When I view a film, I take all aspects of the film into account and then from there I add it all together. That's what the filmmaking process is to me, and THAT'S what I mean when I say that both of those films are poorly made...bad filmmaking. There is no looking past the horrible aspects of the films. No one who gives a shit about film can be blind to all of the faults in The Village. For my few thoughts on TDAT, see this page. It shares so many faults with The Village. I can't believe that these two films were released in the same year. I'll never forget the year 2004, heh. Two of my favorite films ever (one being my #1 favorite) and two of my least favorite films ever (one also being my #1 least favorite) all came out in the same year. http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...0tomorrow&st=90 One quick note. Even though I say that TDAT is my least favorite film ever, I do not actually mean that I believe it to be the worst film ever. It was a much better film in many ways than The Village. I suppose all of the politicalness of TDAT just really got to me, and I found it largely pathetic in that respect.

We are not insulting you, you are simply taking it like that.

This thread taught me that there is apparently a limit to how many characters you can put in spoiler tags. I had to go back to my long post and put the first part in tags, then the second part in another set of tags, to make them all "spoilers". Did anyone else know this? Just look at the first line of Edwin MacPhisto's post above. I just found this odd.

Because a film is more than just what you visually see. A film can look outstanding, yet still be very poorly made, and a piece of shit. There is such a thing as a poorly made film, and with the writing, acting, the entire concept and setup of this one, The Village is most certainly one of them, even if it has a few shots that are nice.

Cool, was just wondering if it was a huge coincidence or what, heh.

Just currious. Did you post this exact same thing at DVDTalk?

Exactly, it's just so pathetic. He can't come up with any better idea to "trick" everyone other than to just flat out lie to the viewer? If I'm not mistaken, I believe it was even said, in an interview or something, that the ENTIRE film was based in the 1800s.