kkktookmybabyaway

I got your back, spman. I don't want your tit, though.

N*gga plz. It's like cell phones. If you're trying to be somewhat discreet I normally won't care. If you want the world to see your actions, then I'll be a prick. (It's fun talking loud next to some idiot screaming on his/her cell phone.)

I laughed at the Braves GM promoting his kid who wasn't ready for AAA ball; I think I remember hearing some other GM/owner drafted his kid in this year's draft, too.

Do you get free/discounted food?

Nice pics -- my favorites involved pyro and fountains. What kind of camera(s) did you use?

I say good for her. She's supporting her son, but if he cheated fuck him. (Not like I really care if he actually cheated.)

I like Madden's show, although I don't listen to it as much due to it being on the same time as Ramsey's program. He's a little quick to play the race card in certain subjects -- like the city's hatred of Bonds. His callers are bigger idiots than Dr. Laura's and they make the show. EDIT: Here's an example of his callers in action that I mentioned a while back: "Yesterday as I was driving home I heard this genius call in and suggest the following: The Steelers should trade their compensation draft picks, or whatever those things are called that they got for losing some key free agents over the last season or two, and get Matt Leinart. Then, the Steelers could have him on the sideline for a year or two while Ben Roethlisberger played until Matt was ready to take over the job."

I stare at those, too, but the bitch doesn't mind (as long as I don't get too close to her pups). If a woman deems this to be appropriate behavior in the public domain, then it certainly is appropriate to look at this act; the freedom to do things in public is a two-way street. I'd say the same regarding going to the bathroom in public, but most of the people I've seen do this are homeless people, so I turn the other way out of choice. Besides, I have a solution to avoiding watching people use buildings as urinals; I don't go into the city.

KKK's Top 103 Posters Number 68: Agent Bond34 I don’t see much of Agent around here. He seems to show up around football time to partake in our message board’s football contests; after not logging into TSM for several months, he showed up and took his spot in my football league, along with Bored’s. But hey, he submits his picks on time, which makes him OK in my book. I do feel for him when a few years ago he got banned by some mod because that person thought Agent was a previously banned poster (Mr. Zsasz). You see, Zsasz liked James Bond, and since Agent’s name had the word “Bond” in it, it’s only natural that Agent Bond was Zsasz in disguise, despite the fact Agent had been posting here since August of '02. But I digress. • Yesterday was a bit of a bittersweet day for me in my talk-radio listening habits. In the Shittsburgh area, on the Fox Sports Radio affiliate, there is this local morning show that is probably going to get the axe. For a few years these two former Steeler linemen – Tunch Ilkin and Craig Woofley – hosted this 7-10 a.m. program. However, rather than having the Clear Channel-owned station cut their show due to low ratings, Ilkin has decided to leave the show in order to pursue other endeavors. This pair had been paying for airtime and had been selling their own advertising. Now with Ilkin leaving (he’s pretty much left already, having taking this past week off and scheduled to “officially” leave at the end of the month) the only way this program will continue if the station takes the show on itself, which probably isn’t going to happen. (Some background info.) I usually listened to this program from 9-10 a.m., and if my local RIGHT-WING RADIO guy was airing a “best of” program I usually just tuned over to Tunch and Wolf from 7-10 a.m. This program wasn’t great by any means, but you could tell both guys were having fun doing this show, and it’s a little sad to see them go. However, both have other things to do with their lives (both take part in the Steelers radio broadcasting team) and I wish both the best of luck. • So was our new American cycling hero doping it up when beating the rest of the world in a sport that our country doesn’t follow? Who knows and who cares. I didn’t get caught up in all the Floyd Landis hype when he was on the bike, and I’m not going to pay attention to the aftermath. When it came to the last seven Tour de Frances, I didn’t follow one second of them. Toward the end of each race, I’d check to see if Lance Armstrong was going to win, and when I would learn that he’d come in first (again) I’d say “cool” and go back to my existence. I think cycling is a sport, unlike Jason Whitlock of ESPN/Kansas City Star fame, and I think Armstrong’s story is an amazing one. I just don’t care about cycling. However, I do care about pissing off the rest of the world, particularly the French, which is why I don’t goof on this event … much. • It’s a shame this guy lived, because he would be an excellent candidate for one of those “too stupid to live” awards. Trying to start shit in a gun store with a machete is like a WAP bringing a knife to a gunfight.

Hawt. If women are allowed to whip out a tit and feed their kid in public, then I'm allowed to watch the event, which I did one time, freaking out the mom.

1) Well technically this is done already with my year-end "PF" score rankings, although you also have to factor in people's EPs, too (If enough people without a team sign up I could just add the 32 people with teams to this "cumulative picks" list and subtract any correct EPs from their scoresheets; it wouldn't be that hard for me to do). I'll see what the response I get to this idea is and think about it. Also, the "current system" was never meant to be "a straight-up person with the most correct picks over the course of a season wins" league. To me those contests are too bland and can be found just about anywhere. 2) Alf, there would be no need for people without a team to use tie-breakers, although they would still make picks based off of point spreads. That's one rule I won't change; last year when I put the issue of "to use point spreads or to make all picks straight up," point spreads won by a clear majority. If someone else wants to do it the "straight up" way, they can start a league of their own. 3) Happy, Smues?

Civil War: I'm with the side that wants rid of the coloreds and Jews.

Although aren't you from the West? Canadians seem to be more conservative over there.

I've read enough of your stuff to know that you're still a commie, even after that last post. But you're from Canada, so the freedom/liberty bar is set lower right off the bat anyway.

I never cared for GI Joe -- especially the cartoon. Probably because Cobra always lost. And look how great I turned out. Then again, if your kid was into GI Joe, he might turn into... ...which would be entertaining, considering many of your opinions of the world, CWM.

Yes. Good stuff, although I usually consume the peach flavor first to get it out of the way.

I've thought about going non-terrestrial, but as of right now the talk-radio choices aren't worth it.

The better half bought this Co Co Wheat shit once (at full retail price mind you), tried it once and then told me I could finish off the box. One of the few times I threw unconsumed "food" in the trash.

Big deal. I've seen a bunch of Equus-like shorts on the Internet. I was expecting a Jen Garner pic or that one of Mole's lady friend, but this will work. Good job (although I do find SJP attractive).

When I was a kid I almost reached this promised land but sadly I came up short. Haven't tried since because I knew it'd be a fruitless affair. Plus I know that now I'll probably end up hurting myself.

Why are some of you guys using mostly words that start with the same letter?

And down the stretch I come. Agree. There are people in this world who perform moral feats simply because it is the right and just thing to do, not because they are afraid God will strike them down if they act otherwise. It's a shame I'm not one of these people that cares about doing the right thing, but I know they have to exist somewhere. Agree. Generally, it’s more efficient. The bigger a “giving” institution is, the better chance of it becoming wrapped in red tape and saddled with unnecessary overhead. Disagree. Sometimes fate does play a role in what happens to us, but it’s the choices we make that determines this “luck” for us, too. Disagree. It’s important that a school instills reading, writing and arithmetic. Also having them return your brat home free of bullets or blades helps, too. Diagree. If by “immoral” you mean “not for baby-making purposes” then I might agree (although married couples have sex to get off, too). For me, “immoral” in this case means “not for feelings,” and for me that would mean prostitution. Since most sex outside of marriage isn’t a business transactions (although with the cost of dating, this could be debated), I will say no. Agree. I’m against homosexual marriage, because I’ve always said marriage is between a man and a woman. However, if a child faces a choice between living in foster care/the government system for his or her upbringing or living with Bob and Steve in an otherwise “normal” household, then I say go for it. Just realize that the kid will probably get beat up a lot in school for having gay adoptive parents. Agree. If not for Porn, there wouldn’t be an Internet today. An Internet where I can take polls like this. Agree. I know what this question is supposed to mean, but what if Condi Rice is banging some guy from Syria and in the act of passion she starts moaning out upcoming military strategies? I would think then that the State should take in interest in this one. Disagree. I enjoy the one time every few years that I go clothes shopping during a big sales event; I'd imagine that's how homos feel this way everyday, although I don't buy anything in vibrant colors. Agree. I may be at risk of sounding like an old fuddy duddy, but sometimes when I turn onto MTV and I cringe at what I see. I guess I can agree with this statement because it doesn’t say if I want anything done by the government about it. I know there are some other societies that are "more open" with this topic than the States, but then again there are a bunch of other societies that are much less, accepting, of seeing chicks in suggestive poses. Developed Well there you have it. Now that I'm done, where exactly do I compare with world leaders in my viewpoints? Am I to the right of W. on foreign policy, or am I more authoritative than Hitler on social issues? You can either take all of my answers and submit them yourself onto the Political Compass's web site, or you can just wait until I post the results in a future entry.

I consider the Times (if you're talking about the ones in New York or Los Angeles) to be rags, but you're probably thinking of the Post.

Finally, someone else who gets this show. I'll just run by the names of people I listen to who are available in my market during a typical workday. LOCAL: Jim Quinn, Mark Madden, Fred Honsberger. NATIONAL: Glenn Beck, Dr. Laura, Rush, Jim Rome, Dave Ramsey (haven't listened to Hannity in months, still miss Neal Boortz). EVENING/WEEKEND: Ellis Cannon (local sports guy), Savage, Mike McConnell (I'm starting to have Medved on once in a while now, too). That wasn't so bad now was it, Smitty?

But who's playing the horse?