Rob E Dangerously

when the fuck did Dupree and Suckzuki win the belts?

"The Insane Clown Posse has just laid out the Undertaker!"

I guess they also found Gangrel back in the batcave

Could they not find a white shirt that would fit Viscera?

I don't think Gangrel and Viscera are back fulltime considering the Undertaker just squashed them both

King Mabel is getting his revenge on the Undertaker for 1995

I use Liddy as my source. I always knew that Howard Dean was bad, and linked to John Dean

Misintrepreted what you said there. I guess Nader didn't want to be one of the rare candidates to be nominated via conference call. The Reform Party claimed to have had 18 dollars at a point in this year. The issue will be if the party qualifies as a party under Florida law. Nader could have made this easier if he formed his own party, with beer and hookers.. or he could have forgotten the party and the candidacy.

http://convention04.reformparty.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi Notice when the Reform party convention was held? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2004Aug28.html

No.. because he DIDN'T FOLLOW THE ELECTION LAWS What happens to you when you don't follow the rules? You're not rewarded for that. It sounds like your mind is made up. I'd imagine Nader's shot is questionable, unless there really is a "Republicans for Nader" movement. 2000 Nader would crush 2004 Nader. Part of it is just vengence for 2000. If the philosophy was "get rid of competition", then I guess the media has ignored the efforts to keep David Cobb off of the ballot. I guess the Democrats probably kidnapped the Worker's World Party candidate. I must have forgotten the amendment that says a candidate has a right to disregard rules. Since it's disenfranchising and all. Sure, in most of the states. We salute Ralph Nader for that. It's just that he doesn't have the signatures to get on the ballot in Florida, and the Reform Party is pretty much dead. Can you tell me where the Democrats aren't following the law, at least when it comes to filing? I guess that "Reform party isn't major" stuff was a distraction from the vast left wing conspiracy against Saint Ralph. This might be asking a bit much.. was it lawsuits, or challenges, to Nader himself, or to the signatures. You can see why the Democrats would be pretty freaking harsh on Ralph, right? I'm not totally sure what party, if any, you're with.. but here's a secret... both parties have been pulling this stuff for awhile. The Democrats in 2004 didn't invent challenging signatures against St. Ralph And yeah, Ralph isn't cheating in the case of the Reform party not being major. He went "endorse-ment" shopping, and only got the Reform carcass. http://www.ballot-access.org/2004/electoral.html 93,024 signatures to be an independent candidate (which Ralph could be, without the Reform party) We'll have to see if a party with ballot access in 6 states, no real state organizations and so on, can be called a major party, or an organized party. Can't blame them for not liking Ralph.. what did he ever do to hurt them?

This is a fun little red herring. With forged memo(s) [You do have suspicions that more than one memo, right?] I guess as part of the Democrats evil plan to talk about this all the time, John Kerry was sent out to talk about actual issues, and then he got massive media attention, by massive, I mean "not that much" The stuff Bush has done wrong since 2001 is much more important than the stuff from the 1970s

The Nader rule is still in effect for Polls. If the poll has Nader with 3% or more, it's bullshit. Nader still isn't on any more than 30 ballots, if I recall correctly. Nader is also 70 years old and unlikely to run in 2008. As for 5%.. who gets those matching funds anyways? Nader is running basically as an independent. If Ralph wanted to get on the ballot by himself in Florida, he should have found enough supporters (that voted for him in 2000 or Republicans) to get on the ballot. He failed to do that. The Reform Party is not a major party any more. They only have ballot access in 6 states and the party is pretty much dead. Although, you'd think that having Nader on the ballot in Idaho wouldn't hurt, since Idaho has never been a swing state. Anybody care to wonder why Democrats have a grudge against Nader? Basically, he was pretty much a useful idiot that indirectly helped Bush. Same goes for Zack de la Rocha, Michael Moore and others. But, I guess among you chicken littles, Saint Ralph doesn't have to follow election laws. And.. Perot effect? Not fucking likely.. Ross Perot, even after dropping out of the race for a few months, could still get 19% Ross Perot, even in 1996, got 8% Ross Perot, if he ran today, would beat Ralph Nader. The best shot that Nader has of getting a Perot effect is if he shrinks suddenly.

isn't Nader a millionaire? Nadar = a combination of Nader and RADAR

well.. unless by blowing a whistle, they shoot a dart. Then they could do that. But.. damn.. It doesn't seem like fights break out in the House these days. Probably because that doesn't really go over well. "I was only representating my district when I punched the Gentleman from Illinois in the face"

I've heard that Saget sucked dick for coke. And his obsession with cleanliness might be a sign of meth use

Rules are for squares

How does keeping Ralph Nader off of the ballot because his party isn't a major party (and they lacked the signatures to get him on the ballot anyways) cause people to be unable to vote? I guess by that logic, everybody who is running for President has to be on the ballot because if they're not, then people will be rendered unable to vote. Or something like that

I demand to be on the ballots for President I may not have the signatures, or the age, for office.. but I am awesome!

Does your definition of "Major Party" include a party which is on the ballot in 6 states and that couldn't even nominate a candidate from their own party?

Rick Shirley's going to sue the WWE for infringement

http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle.jh...storyID=6235077 Who has indirectly aided terror the most.. the guy who does drugs? or the legislator keeps making laws to get tougher on drugs, which forces a black market trade of drugs? Quite honestly, I don't see any real constitutional grounds for federal drug laws. And there's not much room to move. Since if you leave it up to the states, the Government can still withhold funds for highways if states dared to not ban everything. Anybody got a total amount on the money that we've dumped into the War on Drugs? and if you wanna know, I'm not a smoker of anything, and if you want to do that, as long as you don't hurt anybody else, go right ahead and do it. I am not your nanny and your government shouldn't be your nanny either. In a lot of ways, America is a "Nanny State" where we do things for the good of the person. Laws to pretty much put plastic wrap on anything sharp. And if you are doing drugs and you commit a crime, then you can be charged for that crime. To put this in an economic-ish light If Demand > Supply then the cost of the supply goes up and then the competition increases, leading to deaths and all that. Anybody care to tell the board about moonshiners after the repeal of Prohibition? No.. when prohibition died, the criminal trade of alcohol died out. The same will happen with some of the softer drugs when they are legalized. Stupid freaking Drug War

http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3497952

BTW.. goodbye New Orleans!

here's the complete article on this woman:

The Democrat is Brad Carson, a rare man, since he is a Democrat who has a shot at holding office in Oklahoma. The Republican is Tom Coburn Via Salon: And here's some quotables from Coburn- "I favor the death penalty for abortionists and other people who take life." (BTW, as a Doctor, he performed two abortions) and he refered to "Oklahoma City Crapheads" too.. Someone find the exact quote on that.. Poll: http://www.w-r-s.com/articles/TVarticles/W...k2MQ_040913.pdf Carson (D) 39 (36) Coburn ® 37 (42) Bilyeu (I) 6 (5) Undecided 19 (17) Here's the spoiler http://www.channeloklahoma.com/politics/3709083/detail.html another article had her claim that she thought Dan Rather was calling her a whore. (what is it with people who claim to have radio devices in their heads and Dan Rather? I know it would be mean to go to Oklahoma and ask her "What's the frequency?") When an election could be decided by a woman with a radio in her head (*).. you know you got a classic * - Provided that Dr. Strangelove doesn't "pull away" from Carson