Rob E Dangerously

Well.. will voting for Kerry appease the terrorists who will attack us if we vote for Kerry? I need answers

Is there a good abbrieviation for "Larry Klayman Sues Everybody"?

- Vice President Richard Cheney, Des Moines, IA, Today http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/20...20040907-8.html

I wish some people could be a bit more subtle. "You've just got to separate out fact from fiction.... too often, in this country, if you hear something repeated, repeated, repeated, you start to believe it, and we've seen it used in this country and other countries around the world"

On the bill Kerry supported: "the bill makes a specific provision for this kind of gun, since they are very popular among hunters, and the bill seeks to limit the sale of assault semi-automatic shotguns (that often have two pistol grips)." the bill: http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?...8:@@@L&summ2=m& "Modifies the exemptions from the Brady Act's prohibition against manufacturing, transferring, or possessing a semiautomatic assault weapon to exclude: (1) specified firearms, or replicas or duplicates, as manufactured on October 1, 1993; (2) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than five rounds; and (3) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than five rounds in a fixed or detachable magazine." and here's a link to the gun: http://www.sirmailorder.ca/show_prod.php?p...d=43&PHPSESSID= but we all know that Kerry wants to ban all guns

JOTW, how dare you claim the GOP would have an agenda with their Kerry on Iraq video~! Seriously dude. Yeah.

Triple H has a super German skull t-shirt!

Nidia.. bouncy bouncy bouncy Will she be the female equivilent of Puerto Rico, wanting to be in a relationship but not wanting to get married or break up?

More on the guy in the first ad: http://www.amnesty133.org/ai/actionteams/d...eissfelder.html

Didn't Bush have a double digit lead on Gore in October 2000, around the time of the debates?

Any national poll that has Nader beating his 2000 numbers while on the ballot in 30 fewer states is one that is just bull I don't know why they just don't make it Bush/Kerry/Nader/Bednarik, Bednarik will probably finish better than Nader

Oh yeah.. I checked the vote totals for the Voting Rights Act House: 333-85 Senate: 77-19 Just a late addition

"We were honored to aid the rise of democracy in Germany and Japan and Nicaragua and Central Europe and the Baltics" hmm.. ok

Maybe Bill was on the Adkins diet and he went a bit far?

Here's the speech with notes, I dug this up:

Why does Bill have to be such an attention whore? He just did it to get in the news. damnit KKK

"To be fair, there are some things my opponent is for - he's proposed more than two trillion dollars in new federal spending so far, and that's a lot, even for a senator from Massachusetts." - Bush "His policies of tax and spend - of expanding government rather than expanding opportunity - are the policies of the past. We are on the path to the future -- and we are not turning back." - Bush "I've got big balls" - AC/DC

Rick Shirley is available. PM me if interested

So, does Bush have the fuzzy math to show that he'll reduce spending, while proposing all this new stuff?

George W. Bush is only a social conservative and he is an economic freespender

Well, it took long enough to allow for the appointment of VPs. Granted, I'm not a huge fan of the current electoral college although I don't see much reason to have a seperate vote for Vice President. It was more of the "dumb stuff" thing. Edwards and Quayle weren't the least experienced candidates for VP or President. Although Edwards has had 6 years in the Senate, and Bush had 6 years as Governor of Texas. That might be close, considering that the Governor of Texas isn't that strong of a position (the Lieutenant governor has most of the power). and who kept it going for twelve years? Harding, Coolidge and Hoover. Of course, a Southern Progressive is a politician who is for poor white people and pretty much that's the biggest difference. That's a contrast to the Henry Wallace type of Progressive. Johnson was much more suited to get stuff done in the Senate and probably much more willing to sacrifice Southern votes. Considering that the Republicans didn't start fielding viable candidates in the South until the 1960s, and the days of blatant racism were gone by then. There's probably a better example than someone like Helms, but the person probably isn't well known anyways. Strange, I thought the story was that Strom changed his ways six years after going Republican. Must have been a diversion. Then again, Gore and Fulbright were both out of office by the 1970s. They would both be around 2 on the scale of Southern Politicians. Not much more than a story or two in most Americans lifetimes. Other than appointments, the CRA and possibly the VRA (which I would have to check on) And which party provided most of the votes? The Democrats True. But they chose to do what would get them votes instead of what was right. Confusing the national party with the Southern Branch. I'm pretty sure that apologies are irrelevant right now. The idea of segregation is six feet under and the mourners of it's death are few. I haven't heard too much on who's leaving the campaign. I've heard that people are joining the campaign. It might be more like "adding new stuff" instead of "cleaning house" So, where are those sources? And yes, a tax hike makes you look like a jackass after you promise to not raise taxes. But, we've noticed that.

Tyler.. hasn't Saudi Arabia been the center is Islam since the beginning? As for the House of Saud. Polygamy sure did make their family free large.

If the Vice President isn't so important, then why do we even bother to a 'ticket'? Why not appoint the Vice President? You actually vote for the VP? Sad. Well, the Electoral College votes for the Vice President. As I have noted. If you really want to get technical, we don't vote for the President. We vote for Electors. Who will vote for the President and the Vice President. Now, if the Vice President was so meaningless, why do they put him on a ticket? why does the electoral college vote for a vice president? You wanna go into that, instead of trying to dismiss it with one inaccurate line? Considering I wasn't mentioning that. Nope. And wait.. qualifed.. DIDN'T YOU SAY THAT THE VICE PRESIDENT DIDN'T DO ANYTHING? What sort of qualifactions are there for this job? Anyways, I'd feel much better with John Edwards being next in line than Dan Quayle. Dan Quayle was a rather poor choice for Vice President. Considering his strength didn't involve anything related to talking. Who, Goldwater? Yes, Barry Goldwater. That's why he won 87% of the vote in Mississippi. That's why he won your state too. I'll put up a conclusion. The Southern Wing of the Democratic Party was basically corrupt. The South was filled by one-party states. The National Party didn't do much for a long time because they feared losing votes. FDR did a little bit (enough to piss off Texas and South Carolina). Truman did more (Dixiecrats in 1948). Of course, I am dealing with someone who will probably use the actions of one to categorize the entire party. You may not like the outcome of a search to find out what party the segregationists went to in the 1960s. Yet Republicans were the force in the passage of it. Weird, huh? Yeah, and they didn't want to take credit for it either. They're so modest! You know, there is a reason why Barry Goldwater got 6% of the African-American vote. I'm not quite sure what it is. It probably involves disowning the CRA. You mean like the Dems, who had no problem siccing dogs on blacks and taking a blind eye to lynchings and the outright annihilation of black communities? The National Democratic Party is to blame for lynchings? I knew the reason that anti-Lynching measures never passed as due to the leaders of the Democratic party. And the Republicans don't have more than a story to stand on when it comes to Civil Rights. The Republican history on Civil Rights is "We did something for you over 150 years ago, and our Senators passed the Civil Rights act, and then we nominated a guy who voted against it". Why do African-Americans hate the GOP? Who did LBJ look to for passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts? Hint: Not the Democrats. Ignoring of course that the CRA passed by a 73-27 margin. Of course Dirksen and most of the GOP did the right thing in breaking the filibuster. I'm sure the VRA also passed by a huge margin. I'd have to check to make sure. Then again, the Northern Democrats also voted for the CRA by a margin of 43 to 1. Dirksen did the right thing, working with Johnson and Hubert Humphrey. That would put him more towards 2. His final speech to the SC legislature keeps him away from 3. "As we meet, South Carolina is running out of courts. If and when every legal remedy has been exhausted, this General Assembly must make clear South Carolina's choice, a government of laws rather than a government of men. As determined as we are, we of today must realize the lesson of 100 years ago, and move on for the good of South Carolina and our United States. It must be done with law and order." Although, there's plenty of other reasons to be wary of Hollings. Such as if you're a tech person. Not according to focus groups. Well, not according to at least one focus group (the Luntz one). It's red meat. Some will like it, some will not. It's the matter of where the "moderates" are. I don't think the Moderates will be coming out for Bush after hearing Zell claim Kerry would "out-source our National Security to Paris" or hearing that Zell knocked on the door of W's soul and got an answer. They will. In droves. Kerry is aware that things are going VERY badly for him right now. very badly.. which is why Bush is crushing Kerry in the polls right now. By a percentage point or two. Bullshit. H.W. Bush denied that he had bashed Reagan's tax cut idea in the primary, and then they showed the "Voodoo Economics" clip. I'm pretty freaking sure that Bush didn't come right out in 1981 and stand against the tax cut. Bush did not support them. This is hardly news. You have sources to back that up. I'd imagine. I'd think that Bush, being a non-supporter of the tax cuts, wouldn't have denied criticizing the tax cuts.

I heard the cover by "Authority Zero" and I thought it sucked. Just my opinion. Anybody else heard it yet?