Rob E Dangerously

this is bad news for S. Adam Hussein

as a general rule.. if the guy is on the ballot though the signatures of people who won't vote for him.. he won't finish well in the election.

You just made one hell of an investment. You should start buying stocks.

Gee, nothing suspicious HERE at all. -=Mike sorry.. I was brief there it's conceivable that the voter registration drives are a bit heavier this year than in 2000. and hopefully everything is being conducted legally. But it wouldn't surprise me if some overzealous people's actions will lead to you saying "they all do it!"

via tomorrow's NYT

Palm Beach county results, Senate candidate v. Presidential Candidate: Bill McCollum - 154.642 George W. Bush - 152,951 Bill Nelson - 270,452 Al Gore - 269,732 Considering the two congressman in that district.. it's not shocking that the Democratic candidates for the house lagged behind Gore. There was a 57,553 margin between total votes for Congress and President. And there was a margin of 3,202 more votes for the Senate in Palm Beach county. The third party candidates that got 1% of the vote for the Senate race: Joe Simonetta (Natural Law Party, 2,956 votes) Willie Logan (Independent candidate, 4,391 votes) Not a surprise He gained 787 votes.. you're allowed to round that up too. I'd imagine in a county with high spoilage.. there will be jumps. Like how Bush got 100 more votes in PBC. Feel free to cite a source. that too..

Well.. i'd imagine this move may not go over well with some voters. For example.. a lot of the Catholic ones.

which candidate would that be? Morris Thompson ®, candidate in the 19th district: 35,202 votes in PB county Congressman Mark Foley ®, 16th district, 70,124 votes in PB county (he won) William Lambert ®, 23rd district, 16,320 votes in PB county Congressman Clay Shaw ®, 22nd district, 36,728 votes in PB county (he won) So, while you stated your point poorly and you were pretty much deceptive, those four men got 158,374 votes while George W. Bush got 152,964 votes in the county. Since there's no chance that a combination four people (including two Congressman) would EVER get more votes than a President.. we'll send this to the proper authorities. BTW.. do you know what number I should call in South Carolina to notify them of a suspicious result? Andrew Brack (D) won 9516 votes in Georgetown county Al Gore won 9355 votes in Georgetown county Jane Frederick (D) won 25312 votes in Lexington county Al Gore won 22818 votes in that county It's pretty damned suspicious to me

I'm sorry --- there are no violent parts in America. I forgot. -=Mike Not on the level of Iraq. or did I miss a RPG attack in Detroit?

then again, since there's a chance of fraud in every form of election, I guess that means we'll have to get rid of voting. Since if we don't vote, there's no chance of voter fraud. As for Florida in 2000. I'm sure there's a better word than interesting to describe how you're unwilling to at least say that screwy things went both ways. Only the Democrats did bad things, i'm sure.

yeah.. you can only imagine.. since you have nothing to prove your claim

Ya know.. I guess Rumsfeld was right about Iraq being as safe as most American cities. I was almost carjacked by armed militants recently. Not to mention the numerous bombings and beheadings in the KC metro area

Actually, I have a problem with people voting illegally. -=Mike Still interesting how you open your mouth to swallow anything anti-Democrat. (Unless such a thing is too embarrasing, even for you) Guilty until proven innocent, I'm sure. Will you make another post on this story when it's shown to be groundless?

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0925bible25.html

"And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional US casualties. And while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war. And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is not very damned many. So I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq." - [Dick Cheney, Remarks to the Discovery Institute, Seattle, WA, 8/14/92]

Secretary Rumsfeld has good news from Iraq! http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/200...secdef1326.html The population of the USA: 293 million The population of Iraq: 25 million It's a deceptive comparison. Although, the risk of being abducted and decapitated might be high in the US too, like in Iraq. "If America were Iraq, What would it be Like?" and here's one more thing from Juan Cole: The red parts are mainly controlled by the insurgents. The pink is the location of fighting. Seems like a pretty large chunk of the country isn't in the hands of us or the Allawi government. The same area which may not vote in the elections (according to "The Donald", Secretary Rumsfeld)

I guess you're all in on Clinton's evil plan.

so.. that's what it means when a dog sniffs your crotch?

Of course guilt is assumed. But still.. I'd say this doesn't go anywhere. But, i'm sure some of you want a reason to try and scrutinize the millions of people registered by groups like ACT. (It's around 200K, I think, in Missouri). None of us have a problem with young people voting, right? even if the odds say they'll overwhelmingly vote for Kerry. For general reference, Coulson is a Democrat. So he'll either be part of the conspiracy or a crusader to the right, depending on the outcome of this.

Within the last week: File this under "Messeges, not mixed"- The Kerry ad with the clip of the "Right Track" comment is here: http://www.johnkerry.com/video/092404_right_track.html and here's a security update for Iraq: That's from USAID. Obviously they missed the events of flower throwing and the bunnies.

One problem with the UN General Assembly is that each nation gets a vote. It's pretty much a Senate. Now, if you get proportional, you'd get the bigger nations and they could block some of the more blatant crap. Granted, they'd have to find a big room for such gatherings. I'm sure the "UN is filled by evil dictatorships" line doesn't contradict the Bush ads hailing all the democracies in the world. I can't see the veto being taken away though. And, it's probably undercutting to speculate on how many people Ayad Allawi has killed, while in the Baath Party and afterwards.

wouldn't increasing the payments from the younger people help make up some of the difference when it's paid to the retirees? Investments work, until the market goes down and people get mad because their retirement money has vanished. That's the big risk.

it seems to be a difference that Bush isn't mentioning when it comes to Iraq. One idea.. combine the proportional system with the winner takes all.. either have 1076 votes, or split the votes to have 538 votes total

http://flprogressive.blogspot.com/2004/09/...t-wingnuts.html that has a link to the video.. here's the transcript:

To the families of Israelis who were killed by Hamas bombers funded by the contributions of Stevens and others, I imagine it's pretty serious indeed. Fuck him. It wouldn't surprise me if Cat Stevens was pretty guillable