Your Paragon of Virtue

Barnett said he would KO Cro Cop in the first round and doesn't seem to be taking him seriously from what I've read. He could be taking this lightly.

I'd just like to point out that Nog was beaten by Dan as well, and considering the size advantage in their second fight, the fact that he slipped out of all the crazy subs Nog was trying till the third round even whil giving up 35 lbs or so leads me to believe that Nak won't come close to subbing him this time around. I like Nak, he's a crazy little bastard, but Hendo is too much at this point.

Wat teh fuk u are goin against Hendoz INSANE~!!!!!!!!! How dare you speak ill of "Hollywood".

That Sergei link was hilarious, I completely fell for it. A big Samoan who has a background in BJJ but has finished all his fights with punches? Could be something to look out for, especially against a guy from Korea that no one has heard of. Is Korea even a country? It sounds made-up.

(Insert incredibly easy Purple Heart joke here) How many times have you been wounded in combat? More than Kerry, most likely. -=Mike that's a pretty big bet to put up. How many times have you been wounded in combat? or at all More often than Kerry. -=Mike Bullshit Did something stop you from going to the army? Just curious He'll tell that it's none of your business, and he'll be right. Of course, when you make a bold claim like he has, you'd think he'd back it up, but he won't divulge any information.

You guys seem to love bitching about the stupidest things. Oh and for GreatOne; INXS>>Dick-waving

Tyler and Mike are waving their dicks to see whose is bigger. I think it's safe to say that this is the subject of the worst thread ever. Proving your manhood on an internet messageboard should have been done in the Cock Shots Thread. It's too late now. No one wants to see you guys throw fifth grade insults at each other on what it means to be a man. We only look up to one person on the subject of manliness: For more information on REAL men that aren't limp wristed feminist loving vegetarians, one only need to visit such quality websites as www.manlyweb.com or consult the Big Book of Sheer Manliness:

This girl was an idiot for getting hit by a projectile shot by the police officer?

Flame wars are for retards like yourself. I'm ashamed to say that I actually took to proving Zsasz wrong. I almost engaged in a *shudder* flame war. I wish I could blame this on alcohol consumption but sadly I was sober when I responded. I stand by what I said though. Seeing as how he left bitching about the board, came back under a different name, went back to his name, and was (probably) banned for bitching again, I'd say I was more then accurate in my assessment of him being a whiny bitch. Good thing he isn't here, he would probably take my post so personally that he'd start a thread about it.

Our leaders don't take any kind of shit from hippies. *Plays Oh Canada*

Nobody on this board is interesting I'd say, save for maybe a handful. I look at it more as how many people on this board are stupid? Many, everyone but that same handful of interesting people. As a rule of thumb, if you're a regular of any folder, you're probably an idiot.

Is it necessary to? No, not really considering that that is the basis for everything else we do pretty much. Pornography is essentially prostitution except you're both getting paid and tons of other people are making profits as well, not to mention the people who watch. So I guess you can't really say no. I'll throw out this question for you guys; do you think there is such a thing as Absolute Truth?

I'm moderate. Not stupid. -=Mike What, if anything, do you have a liberal view on? Because I've only seen you to have a conservative view of anything, even social issues, which is where most conservatives tend to be liberal on, if at all. I'd imagine that since you come off so conservative on the stuff you talk about on here that you must be a hippie on some other stuff to balance it out, seeing as how you are a "moderate". Well, I support human rights...but since that is no longer a liberal concern, it's tough. How about I support marijuana legalization, prostitution legalization, and gambling legalization? -=Mike Eh, Human rights sounds like something that doesn't belong on the political spectrum. Prostitution? Egads, that IS out there, to say the least. Can you defend that with anything other then "people should do what they want as long as they are not hurting anyone else"?

I'm moderate. Not stupid. -=Mike What, if anything, do you have a liberal view on? Because I've only seen you to have a conservative view of anything, even social issues, which is where most conservatives tend to be liberal on, if at all. I'd imagine that since you come off so conservative on the stuff you talk about on here that you must be a hippie on some other stuff to balance it out, seeing as how you are a "moderate".

I thought Mike was the most moderate poster on the board. Doesn't that mean you have to shower equal love upon conservatives and liberals

I'm probably a little late on these two but here goes.. 1) The last time I saw AS was when he was scolding some other NY fan on the board about jokingly offering to break out the brooms, after they won Game 3. Since Game Four he hasn't been around. 2) Cartman changed his sig and avatar COMPLETELY from Red Sox stuff to Patriots stuff. He strikes me as a fairweather fan, who latches onto a winner. He doesn't seem like the stereotypical suffering Sox fan. He just went with the Pats, because they WIN. I wonder what he's doing now. I'm glad the Sox won, all those Sox fans who doubted them and gave up after Game Three should be feeling like Benedict Arnold right now. Okay one more; 3) Banky was rubbing it in all the Sox fans' faces after Game Three, talking about last year's collapse and how it was the biggest choke in the history of the playoffs or something along those lines. I wonder if he still feels the same way now. Okay, it's really easy to point egg on a person's face in a situation like this, but when else can you mock a person for wavering feelings like when the series is seemingly over at 3-0, only to see the losing team come back to win 4-3? Oh that's right NEVER. Enjoy it while it lasts, I'm happy for the Sox, but don't get too happy now, the Curse is for the World Series, not for the Yankees. When Johnny Damon talked about partying in the post game interview, I got the idea that you guys aren't the only ones celebrating a little too much with this. It doesn't matter how historic the victory was, there's still a World Series to be played, and if you rest on your accolades for this accomplishment, while amazing, you will be regretting it come World Series time. Sure, it was just an innocent comment, but I can't be the only one who did a double take upon hearing that.

HOLY SHIT I WAS JUST JOKING ABOUT THE WHOLE MNF THING!!! When you said GO Pack I thought you were just...damn, that's fucked up. I'd like the Pack to win, not because I care about the election but because they will need it in order to get in the playoffs. They need anything they can get. Packers win>>>Whoever becomes President of a country I don't reside in. Damn, that's just...wow. DUN DUN DUN DUN!

I didn't read the article, but upon passing by it on another website, the subtitle read something along the lines of them picking the correct winner in the past four elections. Will Kerry make it five? *Cue omin..Monday Night Football music*

Most close sources to me told me the album sucked, and these are people that LOVED Blacker on Both Sides. I'm gonna take a pass on it, I might just hear it for kicks one of these days, but I'm sure I'll be disappointed. Ah fuck it, BOBS is one of my favourite rap albums ever, even if they say it's the worst album ever, I'm picking it up.

I wanna get with you and your sister?

I was more or less referring to people on the board, I never said all conservatives have double standards, nor did I even mention anything about grouping all of them together. So since I didn't mention a specific case of a liberal being biased and using an example, you automatically assume that I'm talking about the whole side here? No need to use bad logic and bring this discussion away from where it should be. To Mike: When I said if I didn't mean like "he might or might not say" I meant it with a comparison, sorta like "If John Kerry does this, you're all over him. If it's cheney, you agree with him." The grammar was not very good thus making it confusing. I don't feel like editing, but I hope this is an adequate explanation for what I meant, more like a comparison of people's reactions to the same statements, it is just that one has an R beside their name while the other has a D.

If John Kerry said this it would be a dirty political scare tactic that would cause many on the board to go on a rant about how the Dems are horrible people and John Edwards is just a used car salesman who happens to be a trial lawyer, oh wait it's the same thing. If Cheney says this, it's great insight. Not to mention that he allows the possibility of another terrorist attack on US soil, coincidentally right before the election. That could be a great political move if people think he's right, but if they don't have a double standard and look at it as a underhanded political move then it takes away a lot from his integrity. Yeap, coincidentally.