KTID

"Lita is a Dumas"

Why is it that I am always the one to point out that things are in the wrong folder?

Did I just read that correctly? *RIC FLAIR* just talked down to *CHRIS BENOIT*. Now that's funny. Flair talking about how he's a better worker than Bret Hart, Mick Foley and Randy Savage is reasonably laughable as it is. But now he's talking about Benoit as if he's a young rookie just establishing himself who can learn alot from Flair. Flair is particularly dilusional, I have to say.

I fell out of my seat at this.

What, exactly, this has to do with wrestling is anybody's guess.

WWE might as well give Flair the title. They currently have it one John Bradshaw Layfield. JBL > Ric Flair

Well there goes Flair's reputataion down the drain. No big loss to me, i'll get on with my life.

Yeah, you lot fight it out to be considered the best british poster on TSM. But, I stake the first claim to being the most british of the lot.

Brilliant song, but how is that acoustic? Yeah I've heard versions with only Thom and Jonny, but only on bootlegs... Well now, its not simply acoustic, but it does quite clearly feature an acoustic guitar and therefor does meet the criterion.

You do realise most of the examples given in this thread are not all that unusual. I mean, fair enough, if you only like one clearly defined style and want all the bands on a bill to sound identical to the band you paid to see, then of course you will be dissappointed if one of the acts varies ever-so-slightly in style. However, if you are a reasonably open-minded music listener then you should be able to accept that a band you go to see may be supported by a band who are of a different musical "style", but the same "genre" if you will. (As long as its not, for example, Dido playing second from the top at the V Festival this year).

Just out of curiousity, is anyone still defending Flair in all of this?

WAIT!! You weren't joking?

Anyone else find this hilarious? CWM thinks he is a popular poster on here?

Venis and A-Train have talent. I just spit my drink over my monitor. I know you were probably joking, but still, i shall be expecting you to buy me a new monitor!

Still no mention of Karma Police?

Couldn't agree more.

30. OMG KWEE WEE

But actually he does since it's, you know, HIS company, whether you like it or not. Yes, because Vince McMahon owns "wrestling". How narrow-minded.

It was a combination of both. Shawn Michaels was booked to lose the title to Sid (who would then defend it against The Undertaker at WrestleMania XIII) and then job to Bret Hart at WrestleMania XIII. By suffering a life-threatening injury/losing his smile/being a dick, Michaels got out of two high profile jobs. The title was still switched to Sid (via Bret, and 4 days later than planned), who still went on to lose it to 'Taker. The only way Michaels screwed up the booking was that instead of facing Bret Hart, Steve Austin was put in his place, since they still technically had yet to resolve the Hart/Austin fued. The consequences of replacing Michaels with Austin in this match would, rather ironically, reap much greater benefits for the company than the Hart/Michaels re-match would have.

The point is he knew he was leaving. That's why he told him on the same day Hart found out his contract was getting breached. He didn't want to job to someone leaving to go to WCW. I love how you're trying to make Shawn Michaels out to be some sort of good company man.