SuperJerk

You need to also consider the possiblity that maybe the story disappeared because there might not have been any truth to it.

As popular as Wally was, why did they think replacing him was a good idea?

He still might not, but this makes it a 90% possibility. Rudy's got more than just name recognition working in his favor, too. For all the love the press throws McCain's way, Guiliani has a longer list of accomplishments. Can his stands on social issues withstand an assault from the right, though? Will McCain even be the right's standard bearer, or will that title go to Mike Huckabee or Bill Owens? Hard to tell.

That was kind of a let down after they'd chased each other for so many years. Not that they couldn't have made the case that he's not really dead and it was YET ANOTHER double in this movie. My 5 favorite 007 films are: Dr. No Goldfinger Diamonds are Forever Live and Let Die Goldeneye Alos...Am I the only one that thought On Her Majesty's Secret Service and Die Another Day were good? Admittedly, OHMSS would've been 10x better with Connery, and DAD felt more like a Halle Berry vehicle rather than a Bond movie.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/13/giu...dent/index.html It should be noted that my 2008 predictions were based on the assumption Pataki would run instead of Guiliani (I don't see how both of them can). If Guiliani actually runs, all of my predictions go out of the window. His candidacy would be the mother of all political wildcards. There would absolutely no way to predict what might happen. He will singlehandedly keep at least 4 or 5 people out of the race altogether, and will possibly go over McCain as the early front-runner.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/11/bush.radio/index.html Bush has completely shifted back into "I'm a uniter, not a divider" mode.

Well, yeah, that and the fact that the leadership of both parties have pursued free trade policies pretty vigorously for the last 15 years.

Bayh's "national security expertise" didn't lead to him to make a very good decision on the war over in that desert place. Do we really need to have another debate on exactly what the 2002 Iraq resolution was intended to do? Because not even Pres. Bush characterized the resolution as a decision to go to actually war at the time, but another step to push Iraq into complying with weapons inspections. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/20...20021002-7.html HAVING SAID THAT...You've certainly hit the nail on the head as far as what someone could use against Bayh if he does become the frontrunner. This criticism of his judgement and record on the war won't just haunt him, though. Have Hillary Clinton even said she regretted voting for the 2002 resolution the way Bayh has?

I think it was all bullshit just to swerve internet fans. I mean c'mon, Spider-Man without Venom? See all Spider-Man comics from 1962-1988.

Yeah. If it hadn't been for the big "One Year Later" logo on the cover, you'd have thought the story took place before the Crisis. Ther was no reference to anything that happened in Infinite Crisis or the preceding year.

The hell...?

So the JSA disbanded, but was back together by the time OYL started? Makes that post-OYL story in JSA seem even shittier.

I seem to remember making a prediction that Hillary and her massive warchest would scare a lot of others out of running. I'm not saying that Hillary scared Feingold off, but I'm sure was a factor in his decision. Warner AND Feingold staying out seems odd if Hillary doesn 't run, but my gut is still telling me she won't. I know nobody gave Bill Clinton a chance in hell when he announced he was running in October of 1991, but Hillary lacks his campaigning skills, and has nothing going for her but name recognition at this point. Her personal negatives are HUGE. She knows this. Hopefully she'll only let her name float out there long enough to keep the weaker candidates from sucking campaign money away from people who could actually win. Likewise with Obama, who I think is only letting the rumors about him fly because he's trying to sell books, which sucks because the longer he lets the rumors float, the less time other will have to raise money. http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.d...601/1008/NEWS01

They said Studio 60 got "some of" the highest.

One more perk to having money: the shows you like won't be cancelled, even if everyone else hates them.

This is sad. He'll be missed.

That's because senators usually don't have many examples of political leadership to point to the way governors like Carter, Reagan, Clinton, and Bush could. Evan Bayh was a pretty successful governor, but he also has the national security expertise that comes with being a senator. Most of your senator-turned-nominees couldn't say that. And regional balance is overrated. Compare 1992 and 1996 to 2000 and 2004.

I'm just amazed he's owned the same car for 8 years. I'm not totally anti-Feingold, because I respect his positions on a lot of issues and he's probably a swell guy, yada-yada-yada...but I'm not terribly interested in losing another presidential election. Just as stubborn as the "Republicans loose when they're not conservative enough" there's also a "Democrats loose because they're not liberal enough" crowd. Neither is correct. People on the extremes of politics usually alienate more voters than they win over, and Americans who don't vote usually hold the same views as those who do. Beyond the fact that I think Bayh stands a better chance of winning than Feingold, I just think Bayh represents my views better and has more, more relevant experience that would help him run the country. The fact that I think he's more electable is just one of many reasons I will support his candidacy.

Rush thinks the defense spending was paid for with Reagan's tax cut, because cutting taxes always increases revenue (Rush also no-sells the 1983 tax hike). There were plenty of National Review quotes funnier than the one bigolsmitty posted. How the hell do these pundits keep their jobs when they're wrong all of the time? My Senate predition of 49-49-2 was dead-on, and my House prediction will come true if the Republicans win 9/10 undecided elections. These so-called professional didn't even come close.

You have to wonder how much of that was conservative spin to boost morale, and how much was blind ignorance. Rush's line has always been that the Democrats in Congress spent far more money than Reagan wanted. I don't think Mr. I-Dropped-Out-of-College realizes that one House of Congress can't make deficits appear magically out of thin air.

Eugene Levy was in Dumb and Dumberer, but he wasn't taking over as the main character.

Has no conservative pundit ever passed a math class? This is as bad as when Hannity said Reagan's budgets would have made the debt 25% less because he proposed 8 budgets that were on average 2.8% less a piece.

Ann Coulter reacts in her typical intellectually honest way... http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/printe...cgi?article=156 Notice she had to COMBINE the 1994 and 1998 election gains for Republicans to find a way to make Clinton look bad, because the Democrats actually GAINED seats in Clinton's 6th year. She RIGGED THE NUMBERS so she could cite an example that actually disproves her entire point! HOW FUCKING DISHONEST CAN ONE PERSON BE????? Dumb bitch.

Steve Carrell > Jaime Kennedy Steve Carrell > Eugene Levy Steve Carrell > Breken Meyer I get the first one was "The Mask," but what were the other two?