CanadianChris

Whatever you want him to do, I would think.

Thanks, man. I just had dinner.

What do you mean, "finally?" There was darkness twelve hours ago.

I see the resemblance What the hell was that supposed to be? I dunno, but it's mighty thin, and it's been out in the sun too long.

Yeah, you go right on believing that.

Hey, who's passing out the haterade???

NC State scores again. 14-7 NCSU, and they've only played 6:17.

Interesting choice of words.

Man, this NC State pass defense sucks. Why wasn't I informed?

Not to say you guys were wrong or anything...but NC State just scored 1:02 into the game.

We need a pool on when the first breast/genitalia euphemism will be used. And, more importantly, exactly what said euphemism will be.

And this, folks... ...is the *REAL* TSM.

Proof that we need fewer TV channels, not more.

What, did you think they were playing basketball?

http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/flash/fs...fsanixmas03.swf Someone had some time on their hands...

Well, this should be a short thread.

Only if he was shooting for the Biggest Tool In Recorded History award.

No, but there has to be an improvement in workrate. Hogan, in general, doesn't bring this to the table. Few and far between. Warrior, yes. Slaughter at WM VII, you could maybe make a case for (although I'd argue they were about on the same level). Same with Bossman in the cage match -- although Bossman was approaching his peak at the time. Other than that, I can't think of anyone. Probably. Hogan has a very basic moveset, and matches against other poor workers tend to be poor from a workrate standpoint (i.e. lots of resting). Hogan hides the fact that he's not a good worker with his impeccable timing and charisma. He's certainly not the worst worker I've ever seen, but he's nowhere near the upper echelon. Hell, Hogan would tell you himself that he's not a great worker.

sticky

ah, the words of one whose mind is too feeble to look deeply into a subject. Actually, the words of anyone who's seen The Princess Bride.

Yes. Go take a psychology class, he has no fault in having a Peter Pan Syndrome. If he molested children, as alleged, he sure does. That fault would be MOLESTING CHILDREN. "Peter Pan Syndrome" doesn't make you molest kids. I'm not trying to justify any molestation that may be going on, I'm merely just saying that if he has this "Peter Pan Syndrome" he probably isn't doing any molesting, and that should not be used as evidence against him because it's stupid. If he is molesting children, then by all means let him go to jail. I'm just saying, I really do not think he is molesting children and I think this is all just a "Peter Pan Syndrome".. and that it is not his fault that his social development is still equal to that of a young boy. Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

Yes. Go take a psychology class, he has no fault in having a Peter Pan Syndrome. All that will do is get him incarcerated in a mental institution rather than a prison. (I'm above saying "Go take a law class." Well, almost.)

http://www.macleans.ca/universities/index.jsp I think he meant rankings for the *real* criteria that is used when deciding on a university. I'm sure he did, but those were most likely the rankings Bob was talking about. Of course, Bob's university IS in the gay section of Toronto, so anything's possible, I guess.

Truly PATHETIC Christmas cookies that a friend gave me.

Not at all. But by associating with PETA, they lose all credibility.