UZI Suicide

OU's spot in the Orange Bowl should be locked up now. They have no other games on their schedlue they should lose.

And.. that's the life of a manger. They aren't going to get everything right, they aren't perfect. He's been consistantly one of the best managers in the game and shouldn't be fired for one mistake. K-Rod does get lefty's out, but it's playing the percentages. Any other manager would have done the same thing, it's not like Scoiscia did some out of his mind thing that he should be canned for. If K-Rod gives up the Homerun there, Scioscia is an idiot for not doing the lefty-lefty matchup. I don't care what you say about a "blaze of glory". In a situation like that, the manager ALWAYS gets blamed. Everyone would have pointed to the fact that K-Rod hadn't pitched 3 innings in a game the whole season, and Scioscia overused him. Don't forget, K-Rod got the loss in game 2 by giving up the go-ahead run to spark the Sox past Anaheim. I'm not arguing that, I think in some cases it is stupid. However, Scioscia did what any manager in baseball would have done. So if you want to fire him, might as well fight 'em all.

Scioscia is a great manager and his subbing in pinch hitters and management of the game when the Angels were down to set up Vlad with bases loaded is the only reason they were even in the fucking game. Anglesault, did you think Grady Little was smart for keeping in Pedro last year? And was Ron Gardenhire smart for keeping in Joe Nathan last week? K-Rod never went 3 innings this season, and Ortiz crushes righties. Now if you know anything about baseball, you know managers love the righty-righty, lefty-lefty matchups. Every manager does it, they do it all the time. In that situation, any other manager in the game would have done it, even the almighty Joe Torre. If Washbur gets Ortiz out, Scioscia is a genius. If Lowe had gotten beaten all over the park like he usually did this season when Francona put him in, everyone would want Francona's head on a stick. Contrary to popular demand, managers can't predict the future, they put their team in the best job to win a game. 95% of the time, that lefty-lefty matchup on Ortiz will win you the game.

Well, Kerry said we were going alone, and clearly forgot to mention POLAND, so you can see where GWB feels the need to defend them. Rules be damned.

Kerry just went totally Bush with that stuttering.

That bald guy is fucking HUGE.

Bush is mad! HEEL TURN~!

DRAFT.. here we go...

Bush is starting to get the look on his face that he had last week.

Both are doing well right now.

"Weapon of Mass Deception" ! Solid.

I like how they have to act like best friends when they first come out.

Think again. -=Mike I was talking about in the sense that he'll be able to do many of the bits, and talk about many of the things he did back before his show began getting censored. I know he'll still talk about Bush from time to time, but it's not going to be a constant everyday thing like it has been recently. The thing about that quote is that Sirius is giving him 3 stations, so the music and his show probably won't be on the same station.

I think Howard's show will be like it was in the old days, he won't need to bash Bush all time anymore, no censors, just good old comedy. However, if Artie doesn't go with them, there's no way I'm ever listening again. I can live without Robin though.

Has anyone ever thought of the possibility that he may have just said it, without it actually being a jab? Just looking for a quick putdown to the audience and said that, without having The Rock in mind. I mean, I'm sure if he was going to take a jab, he'd do something like he used to do with the "take your ball and go home like Austin did" things.

Man, the Dodgers are done. I don't know why I had any hope. You are not winning a game when your #2 starter in the playoffs is JEFF WEAVER!

Son of a bitch, that guy Alex Jones is a nut. That site almost had me believing there really is a New World Order.

I hope John Kerry keeps the ILLEGAL PEN~! at home this time.

Good shit, good shit.

Well the Weapons Inspectors concluding that he had none might have been a hint. Saddam never actually came out and admitted to having a Nuclear Bomb. We KNOW North Korea has nukes. We also know that Iran has been purchasing Uraniam and other black market nuclear parts. [QU

The biggest concern was that Saddam was a threat --- which he was. And the report goes a long way in showing that Bush COULDN'T have done this more diplomatically. -=Mike He didn't have any fucking WMD's so how could he be a threat? He rushed to Iraq when right now N. Korea and Iran are much bigger threats than Saddam has been in over a decade. We don't know where the WMD's he had went. Nobody can say he actually disposed of them. We were concerned about him either using them himself --- or, even worse, selling them to other terrorists. We know he intended to re-start up the WMD program when he managed to shake off the sanctions, which was becoming a more likely possibility. We know he bribed the UN for reasons we'll never fully understand. And, let's say our intel about N. Korea and Iran is wrong --- HARDLY a stretch. Will you say any action taken was done on a lie? -=Mike Well there's a lot more evidence to N. Korea and Iran considering they've admitted having Nukes, or at least N. Korea has, but Iran is pretty much guarenteed to have it as well, or to at least be in the process of creating them, considering what they've been doing the past couple of years. So what was the reason for invading Iraq then? The Duelfer Report stated he had no way to make new WMD's, and only intended to start a nuclear program IF UN sanctions are lifted. So while Al Qaeda, the people who actually DID attack us, and Bin Laden are in Afghanistan, we go after a guy who has no WMD's. That makes sense.

The biggest concern was that Saddam was a threat --- which he was. And the report goes a long way in showing that Bush COULDN'T have done this more diplomatically. -=Mike He didn't have any fucking WMD's so how could he be a threat? He rushed to Iraq when right now N. Korea and Iran are much bigger threats than Saddam has been in over a decade.

The whole reason we went there was to take him out and get his WMD's right? Well he never had any, so what the fuck was the point of going in?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._iraq_weapons_2

You know I hear this a lot... and I don't get it. I can think of about ten ways to push this series into the 3 or 4 season mark, at least. Hell the first season alone is only the first, what is it, 40 days of them on the island??? Then the second season picks up later, as they start to adjust to life. Alliances, defections, relationships, Lord of the Flies type stuff, splitting into groups, "nations" (kinda like Adebisi did in S4 of Oz ), long term war betwen them, the possibilities are pretty endless, especially with the great character development we've seen so far, which means they can do entire episodes that have little to do with rumblings in the forest, just character drama, and it should still be interesting. And I haven't even mentioned all the mysterious strange stuff on the island. Creatively, I can see this show going for 4 years, assuming the ratings are there. I think it's because mainly, everyone watching, or at least everyone I've talked to about it, is eagerly anticipating finding out where they actually are and what's on the island. It's going to be hard to drag that out past one season beacuse I don't think so many people are going to want to be left hanging that long.