garfieldsnose

Nice to see I don't have to waste a DVD on the shorties again.

You only need one thread every few days or per week for the topics he is coming up with. Too much discussion will happen and then die down because he won't be here forever to make fifty topics in one hour.

He also does the same thing at the 411mania boards. There is also a topic there about how annoying those posters find him.

Which explains my point. I know they teamed up twice. The first time they were still feuding or just finishing up. The second time was sort of out of nowhere.

Who wants new shelf paper in all their closets?

Or as a wrestling fan, you should realize that you shouldn't be spoonfed every detail about every single thing going on, and come to your own conclusions on issues. I've always done this. Say wrestler x feuds with wrestler y, then one turns face or heel and they both have an issue with another wrestler and seem all buddy buddy. Why do we have to be explained as to why they are friendly? Just assume they patched things up off camera. Not a hard concept to adopt. That's how you could explain HBK and Batista teaming up last year at a RAW, after their mini feud. Just assume they patched things up off screen.

I forgot WWE folder = serious unless Venk posts. You're one of the worst trolls anyway, bro. But that's neither here nor there.

Most of the retards post in the WWE Folder, so why not have a thread to make fun of them? Isn't that what this is for? You have some great material with Canadian Dragon, goldengreek, YKRG, etc.

I'd rather Linda take out Legacy herself and declare herself the World Heavyweight Champion. Way better than your sucky fantasy booking.

goldengreek proves once again he sucks.

Not you sir, you got in a post before I was able to post. Twas at ArmDrag Fan.

The SNICK thread was laughable.

Then don't watch. I don't think I'm going to read this thread after RAW ends.

Every player who has ever signed with the Yankees "gives them the best chance to win the World Series"

But Paul Heyman is a genious.

Yes, I'm fairly certain I did see the angle you are talking about, because the first few shots I saw I said his right foot wasn't down. Then after seeing the other ones, which were zoomed, it was clear that it was.

That's why they have more than one angle. To get the call right. If his foot was down, it was down. And it was. So what's the big outcry for? (not singling you out, but everyone that's complaining about it.)

Nope.

I saw two angles and it was very clear Holmes had both feet down. Not even a controversy about it. Come on.

I don't know the rule by heart, but would the tuck rule imply the QB was pump faking? Looked obvious Warner was going long and not trying to fake on that one.

Tony Dungy says hi.

Ball was loose before his arm was coming forward. It was.

I did. Jerk.

Thanks for not reading my previous post!