Guest CronoT Report post Posted June 25, 2003 When do you think the Elimination Chamber will be used again? Will it become a permanent part of Survivor Series, or will it be like HIAC, and used to pop buy-rates? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest HartFan86 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 I'd like it to see it used as a yearly thing at Survivor Series, maybe even make it like a War Games type thing (3 on 3, 2 guys start, 4 other guys wait in the boxes) or make it a tradional Survivor Series (4 on 4, 2 guys start, 6 others wait in boxes). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest tpww7 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 Next Raw only PPV, they need to find some way for people to want to buy them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Showstoppa Icon Report post Posted June 25, 2003 for $1,000,000 it better be used again Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LooseCannon25 0 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 that shit wasnt actually $1,000,000....more like $300,000. They should use it anually at Survivor Series [in very low toned voice} Elimiiiiiination Chaaaamber Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisMWaters 0 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 If the split stays for WrestleMania 20 and after it...I say WrestleMania 20 will be when the Elimination Chamber next rears it's metallic head. Otherwise...maybe Survivor Series... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ViciousFish Report post Posted June 25, 2003 I'd like to see the Elimination Chamber come back. Besides being entirely predictable when everyone would come out of the box, who won and how the wrestlers were eliminated it was a nice change. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LooseCannon25 0 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 Could they make the ceiling higher though so RVD can do a frog splash without crushing HHH's throat.........eh.....wait a minute.....on second though, keep it exactly the same and put HHH in with RVD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 The way I understood it, they would be using it every Survivor Series at that shows yearly gimmick (like the Rumble's Rumble) to justify the $500,000 it cost to make. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 25, 2003 The way I understood it, they would be using it every Survivor Series at that shows yearly gimmick (like the Rumble's Rumble) to justify the $500,000 it cost to make. That's the way I remember it, too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 Could they make the ceiling higher though so RVD can do a frog splash without crushing HHH's throat.........eh.....wait a minute.....on second though, keep it exactly the same and put HHH in with RVD LMAO Anyway, I agree, make it an annual thing, once per year like HIAC (There were 2 HIAC matches last year because there wasn't one used in 2001). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 25, 2003 once per year like HIAC HIAC comes out more than once a year. Unless I'm missing some... 1 in 1997 2 in 1998 1 in 1999 2 in 2000 0 in 2001 2 in 2002 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest HellSpawn Report post Posted June 25, 2003 I second that "once a year" use of the Elimination Chamber. The problem is... we need 6 guys to be involved in a championship match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Czech Republic Report post Posted June 25, 2003 The logical thing to do is Survivor Series matches of Raw teams versus Smackdown teams, culminating in a Grand Finale match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Youth N Asia Report post Posted June 25, 2003 I'd hate for them to gimmick up a Wrestlemania main event with it. I could live with it being a Survivor Series thing, but I hope they don't overkill it like with HIAC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Youth N Asia Report post Posted June 25, 2003 I second that "once a year" use of the Elimination Chamber. The problem is... we need 6 guys to be involved in a championship match. Unless they're going to run a Raw vs Smackdown angle that would make no sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 1 in 1997 2 in 1998 1 in 1999 2 in 2000 0 in 2001 2 in 2002 Fuck, I forgot about the 6 Man one! I just thought they had 2 HIACs last year to make up not having one in 2001. What was the other one in 1998 besides The Undertaker Vs. Mankind? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted June 25, 2003 There were three HIAC in 98. Taker/Austin v. Foley/Kane Foley v. Kane Foley v. Taker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Youth N Asia Report post Posted June 25, 2003 Might as well add this year's to the list. So what's that, 10 friggin times now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheex Incarnate 0 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 6 guys to do it every year wouldn't be too hard. This year if they kept it all RAW again they could have; Triple H, Goldberg, Kane, Chris Jericho, The Rock (if he's back), and Kevin Nash. SmackDown could do; Brock Lesnar, Kurt Angle, Chris Benoit, Big Show, Rhyno, and any other of their awesome talent pool. Or they could make Survivor Series a RAW vs. SmackDown! PPV where they each pick teams to face off in the Chamber -Cheex Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Murmuring Beast 0 Report post Posted June 25, 2003 They could turn it into a cloning chamber. World Title Match: Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H BAH, GAWD, MOMMA, WHO'LL WIN THIS ONE?!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Youth N Asia Report post Posted June 25, 2003 They could turn it into a cloning chamber. World Title Match: Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H BAH, GAWD, MOMMA, WHO'LL WIN THIS ONE?!!! It's a 6 way no contest, cause HHH ain't jobbing, not even to HHH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 25, 2003 Taker/Austin v. Foley/Kane That one never started, so it doesn't count Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Czech Republic Report post Posted June 25, 2003 They could turn it into a cloning chamber. World Title Match: Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H vs Triple H BAH, GAWD, MOMMA, WHO'LL WIN THIS ONE?!!! That reminds me of the long-standing IWC slip-up of "Triple HHH." EDIT: I accidentally said "Triple HHH vs Triple HHH would be the resulting match," but I realized that would be wrong, then realized it was right after all. I think maybe. EDIT 2: My reasoning for thinking it was wrong was reading it as "Triple Triple H" which would be nine Helmsleys in a match of 18, far more than we need. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wrestlingbs Report post Posted June 26, 2003 Vince has gone on the record saying that it will be used once a year. It's a shame the first time it was used everybody and their momma already knew either HHH or HBK would win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted June 26, 2003 Foley v. Kane Shit, how could I forget? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest undisputedjericho Report post Posted June 26, 2003 Wouldn't 'Triple HHH' be HHHHHHHHH? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest edotherocket Report post Posted June 26, 2003 It's a shame the first time it was used everybody and their momma already knew either HHH or HBK would win. Hehe...I remember bps was CONVINCED RVD would win it. He had a big long post with good reasoning (he was over, the time was right etc.) and on the night, RVD comes out, he's the most over guy and BAM! eliminated first by a missile dropkick. Ah...the memories. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CronoT Report post Posted June 26, 2003 After RVD became the first victim of the Triple H Syndrome, he was supposed to be buried in lower-mid card hell. But, he was still so over, Triple H had some strings pulled, and had him pulled completely off a PPV, and shoved into hosting from The World. Then, when they had no choice but to put him in the EC, he was sent in to be slaughtered. Instead, he damn near ended Levesque's career, (revenge injury?) and then got dumped even harder, doing first matches and Heat matches. But, he got over AGAIN, and so they tried to bleed off some of his heat by tagging him with Kane. But instead, RVD got KANE OVER, and they had no choice but to put the titles on them when Regal went out. Now, they've copied the Booker/Goldust split, making RVD the new Goldust. Watch for RVD to get over AGAIN, and them just droppping him to full-time Heat jobbing. RVD is the new Steve Austin or HBK, but because people in high places feel threatened, we'll probably never see the World Title in his hands until Triple H retires, either by his choice, or the leg goes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted June 26, 2003 I liked the concept Elimination Chamber had although it was killed by obvious winner (s). However, I dont think War Games works in The Chamber myself personally. I can't see how they would do a Classic 5 VS 5 War games with the cell unless they add a couple more "Cells". Do it again at Series with an Raw/SD intrapromotional War Games... Have the Heavyweight Champs out So While HHH Fights Booker (Random Mid-Card Face) and Lesnar fights Benoit... You have WAR GAMES Team Raw -------------- Chris Jericho (Heel) Christian (Heel) RVD (Face) Dudley Boyz (Faces) *Since we can't tell Kane's direction at the moment he isn't there *Here Jericho nominates himself the Leader while RVD is clearly the guy the others pay attention to (even X) Team Smackdown ------------------------ Kurt Angle (Face) Rhyno (Heel) The Best Damn Tag Team Period (Heels) Undertaker (Face) Voila. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites