Guest Spicy McHaggis Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 When I say unethical... I mean murdering, raping, and lying under oath. 1) Who? 2) Who? 3) That's more unethical than snorting coke and insider trading, not to mention going AWOL? 1) Vince Foster 2) Juanita Broderick 3) I completely disagree
Guest Bosstones Fan Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 3) That's more unethical than snorting coke and insider trading, not to mention going AWOL? Let's not forget Clinton's marijuana use. ... Oh, wait, no, never mind. He didn't inhale. Carry on. (I'll leave out plugging chubby interns and then lying to America about it, just to keep it simple. Oh, and that whole draft dodging thing too.)
Guest DrTom Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 Hell, I have no love at all for the Clintons, and even I don't think they murdered Vince Foster.
Your Paragon of Virtue Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 I've never heard of either Juanita or Vince. Can someone link a good website explaining some of that to me?
Guest Tyler McClelland Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 Both are stupid American Spectator attempts to smear Clinton, both were absurd.
Guest Tyler McClelland Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 Let's not forget Clinton's marijuana use. Kay.
Guest Jobber of the Week Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 I've never heard of either Juanita or Vince. Can someone link a good website explaining some of that to me? From the internet's dictionary of all things, Everything2: http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=132906 Former White House Deputy Counsel for President Bill Clinton. He committed suicide in a public park in Washington, DC, on July 20, 1993. Or did he? Many folks on the Flying Monkey Right insist that he was murdered by order of someone in the White House--the conspiracy theorists usually blame Hillary. The police, the FBI, an independent counsel, and "60 Minutes" all say Foster killed himself, but does that prove anything? No, all that proves is that they're all in on the Conspiracy. Evidence? Don't confuse me with the facts--my mind's made up!
Guest JMA Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 Let's not forget Clinton's marijuana use. ... Oh, wait, no, never mind. He didn't inhale. Carry on. (I'll leave out plugging chubby interns and then lying to America about it, just to keep it simple. Oh, and that whole draft dodging thing too.) As opposed to cocaine and abuse of alcohol? Marijuana doesn't really compare to those. Bush is lucky he never got too addicted to the stuff. As for Clinton, I never really had a problem with him. I was actualy pretty happy when he was in office. BTW, why was Clinton asked under oath about Lewinsky? Was an affair really important enough to warrant that? He did lie to America, but so did people like Nixon.
Guest DrTom Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 As opposed to cocaine and abuse of alcohol? Marijuana doesn't really compare to those. They're all addictive drugs, with alcohol being the only legal one of the three. Personally, I don't give a shit if Clinton fired up the doobies or if Bush did a few lines. People aren't perfect, even Presidents, though I think we should hold them to higher standards once they're in office. BTW, why was Clinton asked under oath about Lewinsky? Do a little research. It should be easy enough to find.
Guest JMA Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 Do a little research. It should be easy enough to find. Alright.
Guest Tyler McClelland Posted July 4, 2003 Report Posted July 4, 2003 It was fairly BS, IMO. They basically went on a fishing trip into Clinton's past, obstensibly trying to find a "pattern" in a bullshit case with him against Paula Jones.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now