The Ghost of bps21 Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 *sees Dames in the thread* That's the worst thing I've read since the **** haphazardly tossed out to the US title 4 way.
The Dames Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Remind me to be anonymous. I just like to watch Bob bitch. Dames
The Ghost of bps21 Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 You know why we give you a hard time about that don't you? I, for one, loved how you didn't just toss the *s around like a certain other net recapper... I loved seeing guys have to go out and do something truly special to earn 4 snowflakes. I love that Styles/Raven falls 1/4* short since it only needed a tad more to be considered that something special. You have done an excellent job making it VERY clear with your ratings which matches we should go out of our way to see. Like Vengeance, for example...with it's three great matches...or Styles/Low Ki having an out of nowhere great NWA title match. Then snowflakes magically appeared for the 4 way...and it throws the whole system out of whack to me. That means the 4 way was just as good as AMW/XXX cage match and better than Raven/Styles. Throws it all off.
JustJoe2k5 Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 I wouldn't consider A.J. Styles vs. Low Ki as an out of nowhere great match. Pretty much everyone expected them to have a great match as their two previous matches in Ring of Honor were great.
The Dames Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Bps...yes, you are 100% right. I grossly overrated the match and I take full blame for it. I have a feeling that I'm going to re-watch it, go back and edit it...thanks to YOU. Dames
The Ghost of bps21 Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 I wouldn't consider A.J. Styles vs. Low Ki as an out of nowhere great match. Pretty much everyone expected them to have a great match as their two previous matches in Ring of Honor were great. That's true, and I expected it to be good...what I meant was they announced the match like the day before...and it ended up being the best match they've had in a long time.
bob_barron Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Will you also rewatch Commonwealth Connection v. Hurridust?
JustJoe2k5 Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Yeah, I probably wouldn't have gotten the show if they hadn't had Styles vs. Ki.
The Dames Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Will you also rewatch Commonwealth Connection v. Hurridust? Nope...because I don't honestly believe that I grossly overrated that match. Dames
Guest Tim Cooke Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Fuck you Bob for saying bad things about TNA!!!! I buy TNA for its comedic value. What isn't funny about: - Vince Russo managing AJ Styles and making him look like a midget in the process - BAD production (missing spots, mics not working, headsets not working) - Eric Watts, King of Authority? The guy whose only claim to fame in wrestling is his Dad. - Heels chasing faces (Swinger/Diamond chasing AMW)- heels chasing faces for the belts is suppose to draw money???? - Leonard 316 making all the faces look weak by always having to save them and play superman. And the laughs will only get stronger when Piper comes back and if Russo gets some more air time. NWA-TNA: 9.95 a week for 2 hours of laughs Tim
syxx2001 Posted August 30, 2003 Author Report Posted August 30, 2003 Jesus Dames. Did you rate it high just because Benoit and Eddie were in the match? And Bob whenever a TNA tag title match ends in a double pin, we can always count on you to complain.
bob_barron Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Jesus Dames. Did you rate it high just because Benoit and Eddie were in the match? And Bob whenever a TNA tag title match ends in a double pin, we can always count on you to complain. Well I won't be watching TNA until December so you can expect the "bitching" to go down. Oh and considering I didn't watch week 9 or the week with the other double pin- I wonder where you got that?
syxx2001 Posted August 30, 2003 Author Report Posted August 30, 2003 I dunno. You just seem to hate any kind of finish that isn't clean, so I threw it out there.
Jack_Bauer Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Im sure the guy should apologize for wanting clean finishes on a show that costs almost 10 bucks. That must be a bad habit of his. Oh bob, check your IMs !
syxx2001 Posted August 30, 2003 Author Report Posted August 30, 2003 Yeah, especially when he buys the shows for Dames and not for himself.
Guest The Real Nosferatu Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Question about the War Games match: Is it just one ring, or did TNA actually bring two in for it. Are the intervals the same as War Games past, with 5:00 opening period and 2:00 each other period. Is it Give up only? (Avoided the Spoilers best I can, just wanted to know the above Q's)
Jack_Bauer Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 I bloody hope so lol. Well, as long as they get SOMETHING good from it, then I don't care WHAT the rules are. Just make it great.
Guest The Real Nosferatu Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 If it IS a downer, then MLW is at least doing it the right way.
The Dames Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 TNA is only going to have the one ring and it will be 90 second intervals. Dames
Guest The Real Nosferatu Posted August 30, 2003 Report Posted August 30, 2003 Damn. I'll try to enjoy it anyway. Thanks for the information.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now