Enigma Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 Is it implied that Smackdown traded Mark Henry to RAW for Bradshaw?
bob_barron Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 You could say SD! traded Mark Henry and Rodney Mack for Bradshaw and Johnny the Bull. Who won THAT one?
Guest Trivia247 Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 Is it implied that Smackdown traded Mark Henry to RAW for Bradshaw? I think they stopped even bothering to explain the trades they make. Bradshaw manage to come on Smackdown and people go ohhh yea. Mark Henry goes to Raw and they nod their heads.
Guest Choken One Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 Smackdown... Bull is a young atheltic somewhat charismatic big man... Bradshaw can be gold in backstage skits...keep him out of the ring and it's good
Damaramu Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 I think it's just that they get injured and dissapear so the WWE believes that nobody will remember what show they were on before.
JJMc Posted August 27, 2003 Report Posted August 27, 2003 I don't think they should explain anything. It makes it seem more like two separate promotions. The whole Vince thing kinda negates that, though. -Jim
Tawren Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Shelton Benjamin, Sean O'Haire, several others started on Raw. Seriously, this is why I can't take the roster split seriously. They don't.
jester Posted August 28, 2003 Report Posted August 28, 2003 Long did mention something about "negotiations" or whatever before introducing Mark Henry. It was pretty vague, but I thought it covered the whole Smackdown question well enough. You don't need a lengthy explanation, not for Mark Henry. "I made a deal" is good enough. You couldn't get away with doing that with a big name like Undertaker or Brock though.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now