CanadianChris Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 As you should. But, really with the way things are going now I wouldn't be to shocked with the main event for WM XX is a 4-way match between all the McMahons. With Vince going over. And somehow winning a world title. You KNOW that's his ultimate wet dream.
Kahran Ramsus Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 I'd rather neither Shane nor RVD use it. It is the most idiotic move since the Worm.
Jobber of the Week Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 Wait until Shane McMahon injures guys like RVD does, then maybe he'll think twice about that move. It's so cliche'd though that I wish they'd drop it.
Guest Super Pissed Smark Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 Not saying I agree with Shane beating Kane but I think everyone always forgets how the WWE operates. They love to have the good guys win. It's not as bad as it was years ago but this truth still remains. Unless it's heel Triple-H, then he has to go over to "build heat". So, who turns heel before Survivor Series, Shane or Goldberg?
CanadianChick Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 Whatever. It's a house show. It's not like this is going to happen on a PPV or anything. Even RVD was getting wins over Kane during house shows. Oh, and if the Van Terminator gets used, it should probably be used very rarely. I don't think Shane is being disrespectful by using it or anything. He just probably thinks it's a cool move and that the fans like it (which they do).
AndrewTS Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 But didn't you see Shane's promo on RAW? He was so intense, so angry, I knew he would prevail over Kane in the end, because his mother would have wanted it that way. This feud has been done perfectly, and I for one am happy and satisfied Shane beat the monster. Hopefully now everyone will take him seriously. ... Oh my god, I feel dirty. So you know the person I'm talking about? Not saying I agree with Shane beating Kane but I think everyone always forgets how the WWE operates. They love to have the good guys win. It's not as bad as it was years ago but this truth still remains. That's fine, but when we're talking wrestler vs. non-wrestler, the wrestler should always go over. Watch them build a rematch on Raw up, with Kane MAYBE getting a win. In the midst of all Shane's stupid antics WWE has the balls to put that non-skippable "don't try this at home" thing on their recent DVDs. C***s***ting f***heads. Whatever. It's a house show. It's not like this is going to happen on a PPV or anything. Even RVD was getting wins over Kane during house shows. Yeah, it will probably be on a Raw, then we can build up Kane to challenge Goldberg. I'm sure the wrestler you can't convincingly beat the boss' chubby son is going is going to draw huge money for the title challenge.
Guest Quik Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 Who cares? It's a fucking house show. They could make Goldberg job to some guy in the front row at the Hickstown, Nebrahoma show for all I care; it's not like anyone's going to see them anyway (outside of the 500 people who actually buy tickets).
Guest Super Pissed Smark Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 They could make Goldberg job to some guy in the front row at the Hickstown, Nebrahoma show for all I care; it's not like anyone's going to see them anyway (outside of the 500 people who actually buy tickets). If you can guarantee he'll do that, I'll be one of those 500. Ringside.
Guest The Old Me Posted September 28, 2003 Report Posted September 28, 2003 I thought they were going to work injuries from televised shows into house shows? Shane at hospital on Monday..Shane beating Kane in a Street Fight a few days later.. Wheres the continuity? Shane has the healing power of HHH. Even if you drop them 50 feet, they still come back a few days later.
EdwardKnoxII Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 With Vince going over. And somehow winning a world title. You KNOW that's his ultimate wet dream. And since the rumored plans for SurSer is for a UT/Vince buried alive match that could mean UT beats Brock then fueds with Vince and losses the title to Vince and then Vince fueds with the rest of his family for the belt with WM XX being the blowoff. Oh Lord No.
Toshiaki Koala Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 Well, it's not like Kane... doesn't suck ass, or anything. But having Shane beat him cleanly is ABSOLUTELY unforgivable.
Guest Trivia247 Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 Well shit we couldn't just ALLOW Kane to just win a match because of Shane's Stupidity of climbing up just to do his big fucking Bump... now that he didn't get the desired effect he wants to totally piss away what little is left of Kane's push.. fuck Shane and everyone that looks like Shane.
Just John Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 I just love how the Shane support and the talk of him being the "good McMahon" (oxymoron in itself) has really gone down lately. I hope everyone has learned a valuable lesson about wishing for another McMahon on TV. Oh, and Kane should never have to job to Glorified Backyarder McMahon. As if the Unforgiven debacle wasn't enough, Shane actually feels the need to pin him? What a joke!
Kahran Ramsus Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 With Vince going over. And somehow winning a world title. You KNOW that's his ultimate wet dream. And since the rumored plans for SurSer is for a UT/Vince buried alive match that could mean UT beats Brock then fueds with Vince and losses the title to Vince and then Vince fueds with the rest of his family for the belt with WM XX being the blowoff. Oh Lord No. Taker has about as much chance as Cena did at Backlash.
CanadianChick Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 Yeah, there's no way Taker is winning the belt. The Brock/Taker match is just build up for the Vince/Taker match. Sad that a championship match is buildup for another match involving the owner, isn't it?
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 Of course and the rumored return of Deadman....
Jobber of the Week Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 Of course and the rumored return of Deadman.... Which ranks up there with the Flock and Bret Hart leading the Invasion.
AndrewTS Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 I just love how the Shane support and the talk of him being the "good McMahon" (oxymoron in itself) has really gone down lately There's a good McMahon.... Vince Sr.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 Or maybe Shane will be a towel boy at SurSeries?
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted September 29, 2003 Report Posted September 29, 2003 the sad thing isn't that Shane beat Kane. the sad thing is that people actually had to pay to see that shitty card......
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now