HarleyQuinn Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Er...what's the yahoo info to join the league!?! heh, might help some. Turnovers should be -3 since -5 seems a little steep
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Er...what's the yahoo info to join the league!?! heh, might help some I haven't created it yet, as I don't know everyone's feeling on the draft. As the choice must be made before you create the league. However, I've got everything set if that's the choice we are going. Besides, I wanted to see what people felt on the scoring system and stuff BEFORE I set it up.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Aside from the turnover thing pointed above, I think the scoring setup's fair
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Aside from the turnover thing pointed above, I think the scoring setup's fair Then what do you think is fair for turnovers?
HarleyQuinn Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I said -3 up top since a guy who gets 5 TO's in a game still loses 15 points whereas if it's -5 it's 25 which is pretty strong
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I said -3 up top since a guy who gets 5 TO's in a game still loses 15 points whereas if it's -5 it's 25 which is pretty strong Hm... True then. Edit -3 it is. And so are we going with an offline draft then?
the pinjockey Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I think TOs should be two or three at most. I also don't think that you should be penalized for personal fouls.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I'd assume so, seems like everybody's cool with the offline draft
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I think TOs should be two or three at most. I also don't think that you should be penalized for personal fouls. Ok... Now I have one for PFs and one not. So does anyone favor PFs being negatives or no?
Cartman Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Offline draft is fine with me. Just as long as we can accomodate to everyone
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I'd assume so, seems like everybody's cool with the offline draft Ok then... If we are doing this offline, what date and time works for everyone?
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Offline draft is fine with me. Just as long as we can accomodate to everyone That's what I'm trying to do.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Just take it off as a lot of teams would be hindered by PF's(Imagine if they draft Rasheed Wallace, heh)
HarleyQuinn Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I'd assume so, seems like everybody's cool with the offline draft Ok then... If we are doing this offline, what date and time works for everyone? Saturday, 7 PM ET/4 PM Pacific maybe since I'm not sure if the afternoon would be good for every1.
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Just take it off as a lot of teams would be hindered by PF's(Imagine if they draft Rasheed Wallace, heh) Hm... Good point. Ok PFs are off, but is everyone fine with the scoring system otherwise (TOs now -3). And weekly or daily on roster changes? As soon as I get that set up, I'll set up up the league.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I say daily since I always forget to change them if they're weekly(And if a guy gets injured, it screws up your week)
the pinjockey Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Normally if you do a head to head, you get in your players before each match up. If there are no game limits, I think daily is fine. If there are game limits, I think you should get them in before the match up. That way it prevents people from stocking their line up daily for the first 10 weeks and after that they will end up running nobody out there and handing wins to whoever plays them.
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I say daily since I always forget to change them if they're weekly(And if a guy gets injured, it screws up your week) True. That makes sense. So it's Daily Roster Changes. Scoring chart: Field Goals Made (+2) Free Throws Made (+1) Three Points Made (+3) Points Scored (+person score) Total Rebounds (+amount of rebounds) Assists (+1.5) Steals (+3) Blocked Shots (+2) Turnovers (-3) Times Fouled out (-10) Technical Fouls (-3) Flagrant Fouls (-10) Positioning of Offline Draft Roster: 1) Marvinslunatic 2) Agent Bond34 3) Cuban Linx 4) the pinjockey 5) Will Scarlet 6) Mindless Agression 7) Mr. J 8) alkeiper 9) razateca 10) Smells the ratings!! 11) Sandman9000 12) cartman 13) Lightning Flik 14) DawnBTVS 15) alfdogg 16) Dangerous A It will reverse in order every round. So if you start as #1 in the first round, you'll be #16 in the second round, and #1 in the third round, and so on. I based it off of who joined up with this idea, as that would be the best way to pick who should go where in the draft. Just to make sure that the bottom rankings get a fair chance of getting good players. Is this alright with everyone?
razazteca Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Only going to be one league? Is there enough interest to have 2 leagues?
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Only going to be one league? Is there enough interest to have 2 leagues? With 16 people, to split it into two different leagues of eight, it'll be a little hecktic.
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 But brand expansion always works Not always. Besides, I think having it in one league would be better. With 16 players, we can still have a playoff where even if you aren't one of the best teams, you could still be in the playoffs (as we could have a 16 team playoff). Might have to change amount of people on the bench, but we'll have to see. I'm also given an Injuried Reserve Listing, so we can have 2 people on the bench and give some leeway to that as well. So that if someone goes down, you can put the person on IR and then sign someone to take his place (or so I assume).
razazteca Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Different rules and the other league would be for hardcore fans.
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 Different rules and the other league would be for hardcore fans. Um... Would it matter, hardcore or not? Seriously, why not just have it in the same league? No point of it really being in two seperate leagues.
razazteca Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 So do you have the link for your league up yet?
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 So do you have the link for your league up yet? Two moments. Oh. And if I add an Injury List of 3, should we have a bench of 2 to make it fair? Just wondering.
HarleyQuinn Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I say keep the Injury List at like 2
razazteca Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 One injury reserve is good enough, as for the bench I do not care.
Lightning Flik Posted October 2, 2003 Report Posted October 2, 2003 I say keep the Injury List at like 2 And just so everyone knows: Injury List does not count towards the roster. So we can have a 6 on 6, 2 bench, Injury List 2. Sound fair?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now