Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted October 18, 2003 Can WWE do WMXX without Hogan? I can only hope not. -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KTID 0 Report post Posted October 18, 2003 Shouldn't the more pressing question be "Can WM XX exist without The Rock?" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Report post Posted October 18, 2003 I may be overly optimistic, but I think the question is "Can WM XXV exist?" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted October 18, 2003 They'll be lucky if Mania XXI exists. -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eirejmcmahon 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 NWATNA will justify its existance if it can keep Hogan away from Wrestlemania 20. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KTID 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 Nobody answered me. Why are we asking "Will WM XX exist without Hogan" when there is no reason why Hogan won't work WM XX, whereas I said we should be asking "Will WM XX exist without Rock" since the chances of Rock working WM are slim to none. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JasonX 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 Nobody answered me. Why are we asking "Will WM XX exist without Hogan" when there is no reason why Hogan won't work WM XX, whereas I said we should be asking "Will WM XX exist without Rock" since the chances of Rock working WM are slim to none. Unless the McMahon Family are gunned down Kill Bill style by a "Deadly Internet Smark Assassination Squad" consisting of Scott Keith, Jay Bower, Ken Anderson, Chris Hyatte, and Eric S on the day of Steph's wedding day, Wrestlemania 20 will happen. Not even Hogan's absence will stop it from happening... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted October 19, 2003 Nobody answered me. Why are we asking "Will WM XX exist without Hogan" when there is no reason why Hogan won't work WM XX, whereas I said we should be asking "Will WM XX exist without Rock" since the chances of Rock working WM are slim to none. Unless the McMahon Family are gunned down Kill Bill style by a "Deadly Internet Smark Assassination Squad" consisting of Scott Keith, Jay Bower, Ken Anderson, Chris Hyatte, and Eric S on the day of Steph's wedding day, Wrestlemania 20 will happen. Not even Hogan's absence will stop it from happening... He didn't stay WMXX wouldn't exist...he was saying can they have it without the rock, WWE's biggest name hands down. I'd like to imagine he would at least BE there in some capaticy either it be as a performer, a part of the Legends Ceremony (should there be one) or even just as a Commentator. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JasonX 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 Nobody answered me. Why are we asking "Will WM XX exist without Hogan" when there is no reason why Hogan won't work WM XX, whereas I said we should be asking "Will WM XX exist without Rock" since the chances of Rock working WM are slim to none. Unless the McMahon Family are gunned down Kill Bill style by a "Deadly Internet Smark Assassination Squad" consisting of Scott Keith, Jay Bower, Ken Anderson, Chris Hyatte, and Eric S on the day of Steph's wedding day, Wrestlemania 20 will happen. Not even Hogan's absence will stop it from happening... He didn't stay WMXX wouldn't exist...he was saying can they have it without the rock, WWE's biggest name hands down. I'd like to imagine he would at least BE there in some capaticy either it be as a performer, a part of the Legends Ceremony (should there be one) or even just as a Commentator. Given the current rumor that the WWE is seriously considering Orton/HHH as their main WM feud, I think that shows that WM XX will probably suck donkey balls no matter how they try to dress up the show with part-time and old-timey wrestlers. If anything, it will make it even more worse since the WWE would be, in essence serving shit with vomit icing on it and expecting people to eat it. WM XX SHOULD NOT BE a celebration of the past. Fuck the past and the WWE and Vince jacking off about how great he is. They should go the WM X route and use the event to FINALLY put over the midcard guys who have been buried and treated like shit in favor of the old guard and the OVW scrubs and make the midcard guys serious main event people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 Nobody answered me. Why are we asking "Will WM XX exist without Hogan" when there is no reason why Hogan won't work WM XX, whereas I said we should be asking "Will WM XX exist without Rock" since the chances of Rock working WM are slim to none. Unless the McMahon Family are gunned down Kill Bill style by a "Deadly Internet Smark Assassination Squad" consisting of Scott Keith, Jay Bower, Ken Anderson, Chris Hyatte, and Eric S on the day of Steph's wedding day, Wrestlemania 20 will happen. Not even Hogan's absence will stop it from happening... Hmm... -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dangerous A 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 I don't think WMXX needs to be a celebration of the past either. WMX was the first WM without Hogan headlining. They instead gave the show to more players for the future as well as the midcard and it turned into an immortal show. Same should happen here. Let the old foagies stay home. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Use Your Illusion 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 They'll be lucky if Mania XXI exists. -Patrick Why do you post here? I've never once seen you make ONE positive or constructive post. You're fucking deadweight and you're worthless. Go bitch to a tape recorder and play it back just so you know how the rest of us feel, kid. I'm with DA on this one, WMXX needs to focus on the future, not the past. Sure, pay homage in a video package to those who made WM what it is, but it should be the stage to showcase the future of wrestling. UYI Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 When something positive happens with regards to WWE, I'll post about it. No Mercy looks like it COULD be a fairly decent card, IF it's booked right. How's that? -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 Given the current rumor that the WWE is seriously considering Orton/HHH as their main WM feud I don't mind just as long as its NOT over the World Heavyweight Title (but yeah I'm sure its going to be) so either a.) Randy Orton gets buried too (go figure) or b.) HHH actually puts over Randy Orton (and Randy is the World Heavyweight Champion) at least this point, I'd take Orton over Helmsley any day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KTID 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 Yeah, but we'd also take Nathan Jones as World Champ over HHH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted October 19, 2003 no we won't...HHH can at least fluff his hair...Jones can't do ANYTHING. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 Yeah, but we'd also take Nathan Jones as World Champ over HHH. Even I wouldn't go that far Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jester 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 I don't think WMXX needs to be a celebration of the past either. WMX was the first WM without Hogan headlining. They instead gave the show to more players for the future as well as the midcard and it turned into an immortal show. Same should happen here. Let the old foagies stay home. I agree. And if you think about the last two Wrestlemanias were "Celebrations of the past" with appearances by Hulk Hogan and his bullshit "20 years in tke making" feud with Vinnie. Send the retirement home escapees to play Bingo or something and let the young guys or those who can still work stay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Use Your Illusion 0 Report post Posted October 19, 2003 When something positive happens with regards to WWE, I'll post about it. No Mercy looks like it COULD be a fairly decent card, IF it's booked right. How's that? -Patrick *Yawn* Whatever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted October 20, 2003 Okay, Mr. Ray Of Sunshine, give me a reason to NOT be negative about WWE. Enlighten me, I'm begging you. -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Use Your Illusion 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2003 How typical, using the opinions and views of others as a base to justify your 'own'. Whatever I say will be in vein, you're an irritating and negative poster and I've found that no amount of evidence, good or bad, will change your mind, so why should I bother with you? Downhome, now there's a postive individual, and look at what a cheerful lad he's proven to be? I think there's something in that for all of us. UYI Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted October 20, 2003 Well, if and when WWE makes some sensible booking decisions and puts on an entertaining show, then I'll give them credit for that. From the sound of things(I didn't order the PPV, I'm just reading the results), No Mercy's booking has made sense so far, so I'll give them credit for that. As hard as it may be to believe, I was once your typical WWF "lemming". The WWF could do no wrong, and just like your average clueless fanboy, I always found excuses for the mistakes they made. Thankfully, I finally wised up and grew up. -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
