Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Anglesault
Posted
I find the whole thing a bit shifty when you have one kid saying that he knows some kids sell drugs and the search turns up nothing.

 

Weeks said he was "kind of nervous," but not scared "because I didn't have anything to hide."  He said there are a lot of drugs in the school, but that this sort of raid was unnecessary. "There is certain people that you know sell drugs," he said. "They could have just searched those people."

 

So I'm thinking these kids knew it was coming and at least had the discipline to get rid of it before the raid hit home.  Plus the idea that they would find NOTHING sends up a whole lot more warning signals than if they would have found a roach or two.  A high school with no drugs is a statistical impossibility and I think most of us know that.

Who cares if the cops found something, that still is really no excuse. What would have satissfied the principal, if a student or two had a joint on them? No way in hell was this raid worth the waste of time.

If it scared the little shits enough to leave their stash out of school permanently (In case of another raid) then it's not a waste of time

Posted
If it scared the little shits enough to leave their stash out of school permanently (In case of another raid) then it's not a waste of time

You're trying to accuse somebody of doing something that nobody was accused of doing.

 

It is fucking unbelievable that Police unsheathed weapons in a school in a non life or death scenario. It's already unbelievable that we have DEA agents shooting children.

Guest Anglesault
Posted
If it scared the little shits enough to leave their stash out of school permanently (In case of another raid) then it's not a waste of time

You're trying to accuse somebody of doing something that nobody was accused of doing.

What?

Guest Anglesault
Posted
Well, you're saying this legal but socially sketchy choice of action was a good thing not because of what it did but what it might potentially do.

I think it was an absolute disaster, only because nothing was found.

 

But hopefully it keeps whatever was there at some point out.

Posted

On the whole "the drug dealers were tipped off and got rid of their stuff" argument:

 

How in the world could every single drug-possessing kid in school have been warned about it in time, and perfectly got rid off all their stash, with no remaining evidence? I'd find it easier to believe that there was nothing there in the first place, and that's pretty darm hard to swallow by itself.

Posted

From what the article portrays, the principal acted on HERESAY, and not on any solid evidence. Now I understand if someone is accused of having a gun, because that is life-threatening and demands immediate action, but drugs? what kind of drugs, how much, how many students!?! Come on, the police raid was fucking ludicrous.

Guest Agent of Oblivion
Posted

Speaking as someone who has had a policeman unnecessarily point a gun at me, I can say that it's NOT a fun situation to be in. Imagine being a KID and having this shit happen. It's not something that can be waved off as "oh well, at least now they won't be bringing drugs to school," ESPECIALLY when there's not one shred of evidence stated that says drugs were there in the first place.

 

Even then, why not just keep the kids in class, and have the cops take a drug dog around all the lockers. That's what they did at my school from time to time, almost always yielding nothing. Why, you ask? Because most kids are actually smart enough to not bring drugs to school. Sure, they might still be doing them, but unless it's AT school, it is none of the school's fucking business.

 

Sending a cadre of po-po into a public school like Wyatt goddamn Earp is NOT the way to remedy the drug situation.

Posted
Speaking as someone who has had a policeman unnecessarily point a gun at me, I can say that it's NOT a fun situation to be in. Imagine being a KID and having this shit happen. It's not something that can be waved off as "oh well, at least now they won't be bringing drugs to school," ESPECIALLY when there's not one shred of evidence stated that says drugs were there in the first place.

 

Even then, why not just keep the kids in class, and have the cops take a drug dog around all the lockers. That's what they did at my school from time to time, almost always yielding nothing. Why, you ask? Because most kids are actually smart enough to not bring drugs to school. Sure, they might still be doing them, but unless it's AT school, it is none of the school's fucking business.

 

Sending a cadre of po-po into a public school like Wyatt goddamn Earp is NOT the way to remedy the drug situation.

Agreed.

Posted

I live around the area, as a matter of fact I took my SAT's there, and I am damn surprised they didn't find any drugs.

 

I still don't really think that the "scare-tactics" were nessacery though, because I don't think it will cause any of the actually dealers to stop. What it will do is piss off alot of parents and other students whom this shouldn't have been directed at.

Posted
The funny thing is police in a suburb of Dayton did a drug raid today, and cited one student and one TEACHER.

I think if I were a teacher these days, I'd be hooked on drugs too. How else would you cope with all the bullshit you're forced to put up with?

Posted
The funny thing is police in a suburb of Dayton did a drug raid today, and cited one student and one TEACHER.

I think if I were a teacher these days, I'd be hooked on drugs too. How else would you cope with all the bullshit you're forced to put up with?

"Who taught you students how to do this?"

 

"You allright! We learned it by watching you!"

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...