Guest CronoT Posted December 18, 2003 Report Posted December 18, 2003 as soon as Goldberg loses the title he goes in Bitch mode. he seemed only to tolerate the company once he is champion but when he is not and he is nor Mr. Squash o Matic then he is not being used properly. And how is that different from Levesque's actions?
Lil' Bitch Posted December 18, 2003 Report Posted December 18, 2003 So much for Goldberg / Lesnar. I actually wanted to see that.
Guest JMA Posted December 18, 2003 Report Posted December 18, 2003 At least Triple H is holding down someone who Smarks hate.
2GOLD Posted December 18, 2003 Report Posted December 18, 2003 So now, RAW will be Triple H and Randy Orton passing the belt back and forth for the next 5 years? Why would Goldberg want to stay with the company? I'm yet to see why anyone other than Triple H would want to stay with the WWE. And I've talked to a few people who only came back to watching the WWE because of Goldberg. The company is stale and Goldberg seemed to be working as a World Champion. I love how when ratings tank when Triple H has the belt, it's the lower cards fault. When the ratings barely increase under Goldberg, it's because he isn't a drawing power. Goldberg, as much as I dislike him, was a good champion and was making the belt important. I can understand why he is pissed off now having to give the belt back to Triple H. And you can bet he isn't the only one upset.
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted December 18, 2003 Report Posted December 18, 2003 Goldberg, as much as I dislike him, was a good champion and was making the belt important. I can understand why he is pissed off now having to give the belt back to Triple H. And you can bet he isn't the only one upset. I don't think ANYONE can make that belt important.
jester Posted December 18, 2003 Report Posted December 18, 2003 Goldberg, as much as I dislike him, was a good champion and was making the belt important. I can understand why he is pissed off now having to give the belt back to Triple H. And you can bet he isn't the only one upset. I don't think ANYONE can make that belt important. You know what they should do? Make Goldberg a General Manager or an announcer. I'm serious. After all, which is presented as being more important on Raw? We've had far more feuds over GM and announcer spots than we've ever had over the Cliqueweight Belt.
Jobber of the Week Posted December 18, 2003 Report Posted December 18, 2003 What a double standard... Not really. I've always been on the "You guys give HHH more crap than he deserves" platform anyway. This is because the only guy he's faced this year who really deserved to have the belt was Booker at WM. I can't think of any other opponents he's faced this year that I'd rather give the belt to. Not Steiner, not Nash, not Goldberg.
EdwardKnoxII Posted December 18, 2003 Report Posted December 18, 2003 QUOTE (2GOLD @ Dec 18 2003, 11:25 AM) Goldberg, as much as I dislike him, was a good champion and was making the belt important. I can understand why he is pissed off now having to give the belt back to Triple H. And you can bet he isn't the only one upset. I don't think ANYONE can make that belt important. I've thought that if Goldberg was given a good regin with it he could have made it important. Cause he was about the only one that hasn't really been buried by HHH yet.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now