JHawk Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Another thing of interest is JHawk is currently 55 points behind 2GOLD. If Ohio State hangs on for the win tonight and LSU beats Oklahoma he'll end up finishing one point behind 2GOLD and two points behind razazteca for the title. If only he hadn't lost NINE in a row at one point. If only something like six of those hadn't been upsets. Damn Cinderellas.
Bored Posted January 3, 2004 Author Report Posted January 3, 2004 Standings thru 26 of 28 bowl games Points possible to this point: 376 Points possible remaining: 30 1. 2GOLD 244 2. Rob E Dangerously* 218 3. razazteca 217 Edwin MacPhitso* 217 5. Vern Gagne* 216 6. JHawk* 211 7. phoenixrising* 210 8. Lando Griffin* 207 9. Kotzenjunge* 202 10. Bored* 201 Cuban Linx* 201 12. bravesfan* 199 13. Agent Bond34* 197 bps "The Truth" 21* 197 15. teke184* 189 16. HarleyQuinn* 188 17. cartman* 173 18. CanadianChris* 170 19. Gatornibs* 162 20. The Mighty Damaramu* 150 21. MarvinisaLunatic* 148 the pinjockey* 148 23. Choken One* 144 * = mathematically eliminated
2GOLD Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Like I said, like Florida St football I'll choke when it matters most. One game to decide the champion. Wow, how ironic THAT is.
Bored Posted January 3, 2004 Author Report Posted January 3, 2004 Humanitarian Bowl: Georgia Tech vs. Tulsa, worth 2 points Pick Breakdown Georgia Tech (14) - Edwin MacPhitso, Vern Gagne, JHawk, phoenixrising, Kotzejunge, Bored, bravesfan, Agent Bond34, bps "The Truth" 21, Canadian Chris, Gatornibs, The Mighty Damaramu, MarvinisaLunatic, the pinjockey Tulsa (9) - 2GOLD, Rob E Dangerously, razazteca, Lando Griffin, Cuban Linx, teke184, HarleyQuinn, cartman, Choken One Its a shame that 2GOLD and razazteca didn't differ on this one and possibly have this game decide the contest which would have been funny. Alas this game pretty much means nothing.
2GOLD Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Its a shame that 2GOLD and razazteca didn't differ on this one and possibly have this game decide the contest which would have been funny. Alas this game pretty much means nothing. We would have had our own BCS then. As it stands, it's one game for the title. One champion....just seems silly when I say it doesn't it? Maybe Raza and I should split the title and have the rest of you yell about who would have one in a head to head?
Vern Gagne Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 It's one year with a split champion. One year out of 6.
CanadianChris Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 It's one year with a split champion. One year out of 6. Only because the BCS got massively lucky in 2 of the previous 3 years.
2GOLD Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 (edited) It's one year with a split champion. One year out of 6. Only because the BCS got massively lucky in 2 of the previous 3 years. Last year was Ohio St vs Miami....which wasn't hard since everyone agreed that should have been the game. Even the AP had that right for christ sake. Year before that, Miami played f*cking Nebraska and that was a joke. Didn't win their conference, didn't even win their division and went in ranked #4 in both polls but ended up in the title game. I STILL don't know how the hell that happened. And no one has yet to explain to me how in the F*CK it happened. This was strike 2 against the BCS Strike one was Florida St vs Oklahoma in 2000. Even as a Seminoles fan, I KNEW they didn't deserve to be in that game. Not one bit. And this year, was strike 3. A system that was supposed to prevent things like this has failed for the second time in three years. And for the second time in those three years, the Pac 10 has been the conference to prove the flaws of a computer that considers the Pac 10 among the worst conferences in college football each year. And the latest news is Carr and a few others coaches will NOT bump USC from #1 in the coaches poll as a sign they have had enough, violating the contract with the BCS. In other words, mutiny as begun. 2000 In coaches and AP Poll #1- Oklahoma, #2 Miami (who beat Florida St), #3 Florida St Florida St vs Oklahoma was the BCS game 2001 #1- Miami, #2 Orgeon, #3 Colorado, #4 Nebraska Nebraska vs Miami was the BCS game, Oregon was #4 in the BCS 2002 #1 Miami, #2 Ohio St Wow, that was easy 2003 #1 USC, #2 LSU, #3 Oklahoma If you screwed up at your job three out of the last four times, would you still be working? Of course not, we'd all be fired. Edited January 3, 2004 by 2GOLD
Damaramu Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Once again...the Coaches aren't going to be able to vote for UCS as #1. The #1 position is already filled in for them.
Agent_Bond34 Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Alas this game pretty much means nothing. While that might be true... The fact that this game is being played on blue turf is awesome.
2GOLD Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Once again...the Coaches aren't going to be able to vote for UCS as #1. The #1 position is already filled in for them. Yeah, but they can still talk about it badly and hurt the BCS more. Cause the #1 not being in the title game is not setting well with any of them right now. I'm not even sure if I care about LSU vs Oklahoma now. I didn't like either of them to begin with and the game isn't even involving #1.
Damaramu Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Once again...the Coaches aren't going to be able to vote for UCS as #1. The #1 position is already filled in for them. Yeah, but they can still talk about it badly and hurt the BCS more. Cause the #1 not being in the title game is not setting well with any of them right now. I'm not even sure if I care about LSU vs Oklahoma now. I didn't like either of them to begin with and the game isn't even involving #1. But what nobody has been able to tell me is this. Why is the human #1 the undisputed #1? Why? Why aren't people going "Well those humans got it wrong. USC isn't #1!" Why are the human polls considered so great and what they say goes? I mean a human is prone to more bias and hidden agenda's than a computer. So why? Is it because it's traditionally how it's done? Is this a no change kind of thing?
CanadianChris Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 I mean a human is prone to more bias and hidden agenda's than a computer. Who do you think programs a computer?? The computer itself isn't the problem, it's the system the computer is following, which is inherently flawed.
2GOLD Posted January 3, 2004 Report Posted January 3, 2004 Once again...the Coaches aren't going to be able to vote for UCS as #1. The #1 position is already filled in for them. Yeah, but they can still talk about it badly and hurt the BCS more. Cause the #1 not being in the title game is not setting well with any of them right now. I'm not even sure if I care about LSU vs Oklahoma now. I didn't like either of them to begin with and the game isn't even involving #1. But what nobody has been able to tell me is this. Why is the human #1 the undisputed #1? Why? Why aren't people going "Well those humans got it wrong. USC isn't #1!" Why are the human polls considered so great and what they say goes? I mean a human is prone to more bias and hidden agenda's than a computer. So why? Is it because it's traditionally how it's done? Is this a no change kind of thing? Human use common sense and logic. Computers use whatever humans tell them and can be programmed to have more biased by humans. Nothing is objective which is why it needs to be settled on the field. Christ, just ADD an extra game for next Monday to kill time leading to the Super Bowl. Common sense says as follows, if you are on the top and you get crushed while the two below you crush their opponents then you move down unless the gap between you and them is wide. I'm a FSU fan and if FSU had been #1, and had loss, I wouldn't want them in the title game. I was pissed they got in the title game against OU in 2000.
Bored Posted January 3, 2004 Author Report Posted January 3, 2004 Hey kiddies there are a bunch of other topics where you can talk about this so please don't do it in this one, k?
Bored Posted January 3, 2004 Author Report Posted January 3, 2004 Standings thru 27 of 28 bowl games Points possible to this point: 378 Points possible remaining: 28 1. 2GOLD 244 2. Edwin MacPhitso* 219 3. Rob E Dangerously* 218 Vern Gagne* 218 5. razazteca 217 6. JHawk* 213 7. phoenixrising* 212 8. Lando Griffin* 207 9. Kotzenjunge* 204 10. Bored* 203 11. Cuban Linx* 201 bravesfan* 201 13. Agent Bond34* 199 bps "The Truth" 21* 199 15. teke184* 189 16. HarleyQuinn* 188 17. cartman* 173 18. CanadianChris* 172 19. Gatornibs* 164 20. The Mighty Damaramu* 152 21. MarvinisaLunatic* 150 the pinjockey* 150 23. Choken One* 144 * = mathematically eliminated
Vern Gagne Posted January 4, 2004 Report Posted January 4, 2004 2GOLD is a sports writer. I demand he be disqualified.
Edwin MacPhisto Posted January 4, 2004 Report Posted January 4, 2004 Second, but no chance to win. Tears, tears, everywhere.
razazteca Posted January 4, 2004 Report Posted January 4, 2004 So did 2Gold and I split the final game or what? Or are you going to do a BSC poll and make the winner one of the * guys?
Bored Posted January 4, 2004 Author Report Posted January 4, 2004 Yes you and 2GOLD split on the Sugar Bowl. Your 27 points back and the game is worth 28 points. If Oklahoma wins, 2GOLD wins the contest. If LSU wins, you win the contest by one single point. Edwin, Rob, and Vern all picked Oklahoma so that's why they can't pass 2GOLD.
Vern Gagne Posted January 4, 2004 Report Posted January 4, 2004 I'll be happy if I can stay in the Top 5.
Art Sandusky Posted January 4, 2004 Report Posted January 4, 2004 Fuck Florida. I should have never trusted them with a pick of mine. Backstabbing Gators... (reflects on his miserable luck from New Years Day onward)
HarleyQuinn Posted January 4, 2004 Report Posted January 4, 2004 Too bad I started out so damn slow...*sigh*
Bored Posted January 4, 2004 Author Report Posted January 4, 2004 (edited) Sugar Bowl: Oklahoma vs. LSU, worth 28 points Pick Breakdown Oklahoma (15) - 2GOLD, Edwin MacPhitso, Rob E Dangerously, Vern Gagne, phoenixrising, Lando Griffin, Cuban Linx, bravesfan, bps "The Truth" 21, HarleyQuinn, CanadianChris, Gatornibs, The Mighty Damaramu, the pinjockey, Choken One LSU (8) - razazteca, JHawk, Kotzenjunge, Bored, Agent Bond34, teke184, cartman, MarvinisaLunatic Oklahoma wins, 2GOLD is the champ. LSU wins, razazteca is the champ. Please leave the discussion of the game in the bowl thread. Edited January 4, 2004 by Bored
Damaramu Posted January 4, 2004 Report Posted January 4, 2004 Well if Oklahoma wins I can keep myself out of last place. Dammit....why did so many people have to pick Oklahoma? I don't care if they are a 6-point favorite....they umm.......got whipped in their conference title game...so you should've all picked LSU...so that I can at least leave this with some dignity if they win.
razazteca Posted January 5, 2004 Report Posted January 5, 2004 So do I get a gift certificate to Sears for winning this?
Bored Posted January 5, 2004 Author Report Posted January 5, 2004 Congratulations to razazteca as you are the winner of the the 1st Annual Bored's Bowl Pick 'Em Contest! You are presented with this lovely trophy: And presenting the trophy to you are: The USC Cheerleader's. One girl of your choice will show up at your door with the trophy.* Again, congrats to razazteca! *- please allow six weeks to 120 years for trophy and USC cheerleader to arrive.
Art Sandusky Posted January 5, 2004 Report Posted January 5, 2004 What do I get? May I have a Tennessee cheerleader?
2GOLD Posted January 5, 2004 Report Posted January 5, 2004 HE GOT THE CHEERLEADERS?!?!?! WHAT?!?!?! MY WHOLE STAFF IS FIRED!!! THEY ARE ALL F*CKING FIRED!!! wait...I don't have a staff.... FINE! YOU ARE ALL HIRED! NOW YOU ARE ALL F*CKING FIRED!!!!
razazteca Posted January 5, 2004 Report Posted January 5, 2004 The trophy and I shall go to every bar from Bourbon Street to 6th Street.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now