Slovakia 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 duh i tihnk bush is a big dumb crap-for-brains who is the wrost president since millard fillmore who almost sank this country to its knees in the crisis of '35. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Krazy Karter Report post Posted January 21, 2004 Democratic retort? Zuh? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Krazy Karter Report post Posted January 21, 2004 get this hippy off my TV I'm ashamed to be a democrat right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Krazy Karter Report post Posted January 21, 2004 100% must be inspected? Bitch, that would take forever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 hey.. if you dislike these guys, elect more Democrats, and soon enough, we'll get better people for rebuttals. (Or preferably we'll make the Republicans do the rebutting) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted January 21, 2004 duh i tihnk bush is a big dumb crap-for-brains who is the wrost president since millard fillmore who almost sank this country to its knees in the crisis of '35. Ah, great, the short bus' entry into the Current Events folder. Can't you annoy people in the music folder or something? -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 duh i tihnk bush is a big dumb crap-for-brains who is the wrost president since millard fillmore who almost sank this country to its knees in the crisis of '35. Ah, great, the short bus' entry into the Current Events folder. Fertig?!? Where?!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Krazy Karter Report post Posted January 21, 2004 duh i tihnk bush is a big dumb crap-for-brains who is the wrost president since millard fillmore who almost sank this country to its knees in the crisis of '35. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 Kerry should get up in the middle of this and get a snack. "Peter, you mind if I eat some beef jerky right now? I'm on Atkin's" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 and Kerry gets called out for being a chameleon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 Kerry: "We voted for what Bush promised" Rob E: "Gullible dumbasses" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 duh i tihnk bush is a big dumb crap-for-brains who is the wrost president since millard fillmore who almost sank this country to its knees in the crisis of '35. Your animated .gif hurt my feelings. I'm never posting here again. You want have ol' Czech Republic, Slovakia, or Sylvan Grenier to kick around anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 get this hippy off my TV I'm ashamed to be a democrat right now. At least Nancy has nice teeth. LOL at the 100% barrel inspection idea -- that'll leave the terrorists quaking in their boots... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 I kind of agree that gay marriage is pointless in the sense that the benefits they would receive could go to better use. Huh? Benefits going to US Citizens = bad? And Rick Santorum couldn't stand up any quicker to applaud when Bush brought up the "defense of marriage" stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 And Rick Santorum couldn't stand up any quicker to applaud when Bush brought up the "defense of marriage" stuff. On the flip side, I laughed when they showed that little black girl sleeping... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ravenbomb 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 so what did he say about gay marriage? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Krazy Karter Report post Posted January 21, 2004 I kind of agree that gay marriage is pointless in the sense that the benefits they would receive could go to better use. Huh? Benefits going to US Citizens = bad? Gay couples, I mean. Up until now I was all for gay marriage, but to give them full benefits would be unfair. It's like giving someone 15-minute breaks from work to go masturbate, and allowing it because masturbation is a habit along the same lines as smoking. Breaking taboo shouldn't change the law. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Krazy Karter Report post Posted January 21, 2004 Jon Stewart is on NBC! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 Jon Stewart is on NBC! Doing what?... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 It's like giving someone 15-minute breaks from work to go masturbate, and allowing it because masturbation is a habit along the same lines as smoking. Exactly. But it is allowed to get breaks for that, right? Right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 It's like giving someone 15-minute breaks from work to go masturbate, and allowing it because masturbation is a habit along the same lines as smoking. Exactly. But it is allowed to get breaks for that, right? Right? Why have 15 minutes when you only need one -- cleanup?... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HarleyQuinn 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 I kind of agree that gay marriage is pointless in the sense that the benefits they would receive could go to better use. Huh? Benefits going to US Citizens = bad? Gay couples, I mean. Up until now I was all for gay marriage, but to give them full benefits would be unfair. It's like giving someone 15-minute breaks from work to go masturbate, and allowing it because masturbation is a habit along the same lines as smoking. Breaking taboo shouldn't change the law. What about the gay couples who've lived together as long/if not longer then most married couples(Let's say 10+ years) but finally decide to marry? Should they not receive any benefits just because they like the same sex? Also unfair to whom exactly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted January 21, 2004 It's like giving someone 15-minute breaks from work to go masturbate, and allowing it because masturbation is a habit along the same lines as smoking. Exactly. But it is allowed to get breaks for that, right? Right? Why have 15 minutes when you only need one -- cleanup?... Agreed. If you know what you're doing, it shouldn't last nearly 15 minutes. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Perfxion 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 Gay Marriage is wrong but Britney being married for 54 hours is ok and allowable? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. And why should AMERICANS be descrimanted from by the goverment. The last time that happenend was Jim Crow. And we all know where that ended up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 I kind of agree that gay marriage is pointless in the sense that the benefits they would receive could go to better use. Huh? Benefits going to US Citizens = bad? Gay couples, I mean. Up until now I was all for gay marriage, but to give them full benefits would be unfair. It's like giving someone 15-minute breaks from work to go masturbate, and allowing it because masturbation is a habit along the same lines as smoking. Breaking taboo shouldn't change the law. WTF are you talking about? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 Agreed. If you know what you're doing, it shouldn't last nearly 15 minutes. -=Mike But you know sometimes you just want it to continue a little bit longer so you can complete that fantasy with you in a seedy motel room with... err, sorry, wrong forum. Oh, yeah. Gay marriage. Marriage? No. Civil union? Sure -- why limit a divorce lawyer's prey to just heterosexual couples? Overall -- I really don't care. Now back to what I was originally doing -- see you all in another 28 ticks... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Krazy Karter Report post Posted January 21, 2004 What about the gay couples who've lived together as long/if not longer then most married couples(Let's say 10+ years) but finally decide to marry? No. Should they not receive any benefits just because they like the same sex? I know a few lesbian couples over the age of 40. They're lazy and unproductive, to say the least. Now if they adopted a child, then I'd like to see them receive benefits. Otherwise, no. Also unfair to whom exactly? Like I said, the money could be used elsewhere. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 I know a few lesbian couples over the age of 40. They're lazy and unproductive, to say the least. And I'm sure there's plenty of hetero couples that are lazy & unproductive. You're still not making any sense. Comparing benefits for gay couples to companies allowing smoke breaks? Like I said, the money could be used elsewhere. IT HELPS US CITIZENS!!! What's wrong w/ that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Perfxion 0 Report post Posted January 21, 2004 WHERE? Mars? So it is wrong to give money to homosexuals but is allowable for Hollywood to do what it wants to marriages? So Married by America is ok and morally right but its morally wrong for two people who actually LOVE each other to marry and get the benefits that is ALLOWED by LAW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JMA Report post Posted January 21, 2004 Anyone else think Nancy was reading off cue cards? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
