Guest reshad974 Report post Posted February 13, 2004 Do you guys think that he will continue his feud with Kane or go after someone else ? Maybe after Vince McMahon since his last match was against him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dynamite Kido Report post Posted February 13, 2004 retirement? Oh, that's just wishful thinking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ghettoman Report post Posted February 13, 2004 He should be attacked by Batista, gets his revenge by doing one of those 'omg stunts' to him, we don't see Batista for a month or so, Taker takes on a Goldberg like role where he's just used as a challenge for other people. Then Batista comes back with a new 'taker esque gimmick and gets his revenge. It's the only useful thing I can come up with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Coffey Report post Posted February 13, 2004 I guess it depends of if he's still undefeated at Wrestlemania or not. If he wins again at Wrestlemania, he might lost a retirement match at SummerSlam. If he loses at Wrestlemania, he'll probably be sticking around for awhile. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted February 13, 2004 He should be attacked by Batista, gets his revenge by doing one of those 'omg stunts' to him, we don't see Batista for a month or so, Taker takes on a Goldberg like role where he's just used as a challenge for other people. Then Batista comes back with a new 'taker esque gimmick and gets his revenge. It's the only useful thing I can come up with. The return of Levithan perhaps? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
snuffbox 0 Report post Posted February 13, 2004 Calloways plan - He will beat whomever he wants to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted February 14, 2004 He should be attacked by Batista, gets his revenge by doing one of those 'omg stunts' to him, we don't see Batista for a month or so, Taker takes on a Goldberg like role where he's just used as a challenge for other people. Then Batista comes back with a new 'taker esque gimmick and gets his revenge. It's the only useful thing I can come up with. Why do we want Taker to die? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Bogey316 Report post Posted February 14, 2004 He'll probably get another world title push. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JumpinJackFlash Report post Posted February 14, 2004 DVD release? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted February 14, 2004 That seems only inevitable since Foley and Austin and Flair already have DVD special releases... Undertaker's DVD should be LOADED with WWE Superstars Squash Matches from 1991. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aero 0 Report post Posted February 14, 2004 * As we approach the much anticipated return of the Undertaker to WWE, he will be back as a full-time talent on the Smackdown roster, not a part-time role as some had first thought. I took that off RajahWWF, so it looks like Taker will probably stay on Smackdown, so guys like Batista & Goldberg are out. But hey, when in doubt, start another Undertaker-Brock feud! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted February 14, 2004 Probably job out the FBI to him for the *3rd* time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest I Got Banned for Sucking Report post Posted February 14, 2004 It really seems that, after Kane, having The Undertaker around feuding with guys like the FBI would make him seem like somewhat of a joke. If retirement isn't right away, and his match against Kane isn't a retirement match (which would be fucking awesome if it was - think about it, he comes back from the dead to annihilate his 'brother', and he's gone again - although it would hurt Kane to job), I'd push him towards the big belt/s (hopefully the real one). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
snuffbox 0 Report post Posted February 14, 2004 I'd push him towards the big belt/s (hopefully the real one). Good Lord Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest I Got Banned for Sucking Report post Posted February 14, 2004 Yeah, I admit that that would be pretty retarded, considering what he's coming back for, but if he's sticking around, what else? He can't feud with Kane forever. Oh, wait, this is WWE... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted February 14, 2004 If he's on SD!, they HAVE to do a Taker/Angle program. I've been waiting for it since July 4th 2002. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted February 14, 2004 How exactly, with the dead man gimmick would that work Angle: You might be freaking Dead buddy but you don't have a gold freakin medal! Taker: REST...IN....PEACE Angle: What? Come again? Fo sheez my nizzle Taker: Eternal Damnation awaits your very soul... Angle: Right...So...Yeah...Excuse me while I punch you for a little. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted February 14, 2004 How exactly, with the dead man gimmick would that work Angle: You might be freaking Dead buddy but you don't have a gold freakin medal! Taker: REST...IN....PEACE Angle: What? Come again? Fo sheez my nizzle Taker: Eternal Damnation awaits your very soul... Angle: Right...So...Yeah...Excuse me while I punch you for a little. I don't believe I'm gonna say this, but I'd run with a little bit of clueless Angle (NOT A LOT) Don't make him a bumbling wuss coward idiot, but Angle completely not understanding the deadman character (He's never seen it) could be REALLY good THIS made me laugh ou loud. Taker: REST...IN....PEACE Angle: What? Come again? Have him dump the urn without realizing, make fun of the druids, and generally be too clueless tobe scared. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ghettoman Report post Posted February 14, 2004 I think no matter how you slice it putting over a similar character to himself thats young and without any long term trappings is the way to go. To me that's Batista who has the size and look, and a nifty character can excuse some generic hoss work if he's used ok. You can have Taker beat Kane at Mania, then have Vince be pissed because Taker's back, he sends Batista after him, who goes down big time with some fire stunt or some shit, then Vince gets attacked and we get a few week injury angle with him while Taker's just used as basic main event filler. Then you revamp Batista's look, make him a complete monster character that doesn't speak, he can get over on body language and have a manager figure do the rest, and have him take out Taker in the end of a semi-long shane/kane like fued. Then Kane comes back to get revenge for his brother in one of those silly WWE logical ways and he fueds with Batista, eventually putting him over as the new WWE monster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted February 14, 2004 OMG! AS has turned his back on Angle and is ASKING for the bumbling idiot rotuine? Well, I guess someone gotta do it at somepoint...Angle has it down PAT. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted February 14, 2004 OMG! AS has turned his back on Angle and is ASKING for the bumbling idiot rotuine? Well, I guess someone gotta do it at somepoint...Angle has it down PAT. Not so much the bumbling idiot, but someone who doesn't quite "get it" He more or less thinks the whole thing is absurd, because he has no idea what the hell is going on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted February 14, 2004 I think no matter how you slice it putting over a similar character to himself thats young and without any long term trappings is the way to go. To me that's Batista who has the size and look, and a nifty character can excuse some generic hoss work if he's used ok. No, no, no. I mean why do you want the Undertaker to die on TV? Botchtista? The man gets injured enough as it is, why risk his health wth Cap'n Fuck Up? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted February 14, 2004 I think no matter how you slice it putting over a similar character to himself thats young and without any long term trappings is the way to go. To me that's Batista who has the size and look, and a nifty character can excuse some generic hoss work if he's used ok. No, no, no. I mean why do you want the Undertaker to die on TV? Botchtista? The man gets injured enough as it is, why risk his health wth Cap'n Fuck Up? the guy gets hurt holding his wife's hand for christ sakes... desperate wishful thinkin Taker haters.. Undertaker might hang around for 5 more years just to piss you off, and then.. the WWE hires him to a Lifetime contract to be a WWE booker or backstage official. Undertaker might take over Slaughter's role as just the big guy in the back who occassionally comes out to wrestle here nad there, but is just around for no apparent reason. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted February 14, 2004 I think no matter how you slice it putting over a similar character to himself thats young and without any long term trappings is the way to go. To me that's Batista who has the size and look, and a nifty character can excuse some generic hoss work if he's used ok. No, no, no. I mean why do you want the Undertaker to die on TV? Botchtista? The man gets injured enough as it is, why risk his health wth Cap'n Fuck Up? the guy gets hurt holding his wife's hand for christ sakes... desperate wishful thinkin Taker haters.. I was talking about taker. I don't think they should put him in with a guy that fucks up for fun. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted February 14, 2004 I think no matter how you slice it putting over a similar character to himself thats young and without any long term trappings is the way to go. To me that's Batista who has the size and look, and a nifty character can excuse some generic hoss work if he's used ok. No, no, no. I mean why do you want the Undertaker to die on TV? Botchtista? The man gets injured enough as it is, why risk his health wth Cap'n Fuck Up? the guy gets hurt holding his wife's hand for christ sakes... desperate wishful thinkin Taker haters.. I was talking about taker. I don't think they should put him in with a guy that fucks up for fun. I know.. You can kinda See Batistia take over as the next future Monster .....Christ when he truly debut in the ring he was far more interesting than brock was.. But Batistia however like you said can't seem to do anything to big without screwing something up. If you ever notice, in those tag matches since he is a tag champ now, he sits in the corner while he Lets the Elderly wrestle most of the match. Im a little curious how they explain the last 3 years of Taker not being the Dead man, but now suddenly he is again... Love that goofy Taker Mythology shit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted February 14, 2004 Well, That only means It's SOH's turn. His character is the closest thing in relation to the dead man gimmick... 'Taker worked with worst before. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted February 14, 2004 I think no matter how you slice it putting over a similar character to himself thats young and without any long term trappings is the way to go. To me that's Batista who has the size and look, and a nifty character can excuse some generic hoss work if he's used ok. No, no, no. I mean why do you want the Undertaker to die on TV? Botchtista? The man gets injured enough as it is, why risk his health wth Cap'n Fuck Up? the guy gets hurt holding his wife's hand for christ sakes... desperate wishful thinkin Taker haters.. I was talking about taker. I don't think they should put him in with a guy that fucks up for fun. I know.. You can kinda See Batistia take over as the next future Monster .....Christ when he truly debut in the ring he was far more interesting than brock was.. But Batistia however like you said can't seem to do anything to big without screwing something up. If you ever notice, in those tag matches since he is a tag champ now, he sits in the corner while he Lets the Elderly wrestle most of the match. Im a little curious how they explain the last 3 years of Taker not being the Dead man, but now suddenly he is again... Love that goofy Taker Mythology shit well...did they ever explain how he died the first time? No. Maybe he has a Statue of limations with his being dead.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted February 14, 2004 Well, That only means It's SOH's turn. His character is the closest thing in relation to the dead man gimmick... 'Taker worked with worst before. SOH has a character? I've never seen him play it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted February 14, 2004 He was supposed to be a manipulative, dark personality with a penchance for evil... If WWE didn't throw him to the wolves after Piper left, SOH/Taker would be interesting feud since we know they each make EXCELLENT video Packages... That's something we REALLY have to suspend our beliefs about...how Taker, a dead man can make these nifty video packages...That's why Paul Bearer should be brought back for ONE NIGHT ONLY. Just explain that the soul of the Taker sent a message to Paul and then Bearer created the nifty packages. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted February 15, 2004 It really seems that, after Kane, having The Undertaker around feuding with guys like the FBI would make him seem like somewhat of a joke. No feud. They'll just build up the FBI so Taker can knock them down. Again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
