Damaramu Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Now the The Undertaker is "the deadman" again does that mean that he has to go back to doing what he did in the mid-90's? And by that I mean does he have to go back to fighting the big hosses and fat asses that decimate him then he sits up and we listen to the announcer yell "The Undertaker has never faced anyone that challenged him like this before!!!" Because well.....those matches sucked and the Underbiker had better matches with normal sized guys.....but they seem to love deadman taker against hosses.
AndrewTS Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Demott's retired, A-Train's on Raw (I think), so aside from Show, who could really fit that role if they wanted to do that? .... I fear a Mankind return.
ChrisMWaters Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Doesn't always have to be FAT guys... There's also TALL guys. FEEL The Undertaker vs. Matt Morgan feud when Morgan returns!
AndrewTS Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 WWE can always hire back the One Man Gang.
Guest Fook Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 So how long before they move Batista to SD to feud with Taker?
ChrisMWaters Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 So how long before they move Batista to SD to feud with Taker? Bah. That'd only work if Batista either went back to Deacon Batista, trying to exorcise the demonic Undertaker...or Leviathan from OVW, which I heard was a dark-side type character.
AndrewTS Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 So how long before they move Batista to SD to feud with Taker? Naw, Batista is under Trip's wing. John Leiderhosen will be getting the big heel push and the Taker squashin', probably.
Der Kommissar Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 WWE can always hire back the One Man Gang. Bah. They should try to hire back Nathan Jones or maybe even they can give us the long awaited return of...the Giant Gonzalez! It can be the feud 11 years in the making!
UseTheSledgehammerUh Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Hey...what if...now this is the internet so of course this idea would never happen...The Big Show steals The Undertaker's urn!!!!!!!!!! JUDGMENT DAY: The Big Show Vs. The Undertaker Show wins a "shocker" when Bearer turns on Taker and reveals to be Big Show's TRUE father! "I'm a bastard no more, they were married!! ARGGHHHHH THECHOKESLAM!!!!!!!!!!!" Show goes on to feud with Guerrero at Vengeance.
ChrisMWaters Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 And everyone ignores the OBVIOUS Undertaker/Matt Morgan feud in the making. No trades or rehiring needed!
AndrewTS Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 How about this one...Warrior returns...as a heel!~ Think of the $$$! He could team up with Bradshaw.
clean rob Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Seems pretty obvious to me. All they need to do is stand Jamie Noble on Ultimo's shoulders and put them in a very long overcoat, dark glasses and a big hat. Then have Taker squash them.
Lord of The Curry Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Fools. It's all backwards. Here's the gimmick of gold. Just have Taker come out and tombstone whoever happens to be in the main event of Smackdown, as they've already done twice so far. You build it up from there, make it an angle with all the boys in the back. Nobody wants to main event the show because they know they'll get beat up so they end up forcing Paul London and Shannon Moore to figh with Spike Dudley as the guest referee. Then you basically run an angle with Undertaker being a King Kong-esque god of Smackdown and each week they must find new sacrifices to appease him. But it always ends up being Spike, Moore and London. Hiliarity ensues.
AndrewTS Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Or they can just keep the card positions normal and bill the opening cruiser match as the "special main event" like the Demon's PPV matches.
Lord of The Curry Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Or they just reserve a special segment each week to Taker coming out and tombstoning guys. Kinda like the Highlight Reel. " Piledrivin' with Mean Mark Calloway"?
AndrewTS Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 Or they just reserve a special segment each week to Taker coming out and tombstoning guys. Kinda like the Highlight Reel. " Piledrivin' with Mean Mark Calloway"? Maybe all the chairs in the arena could have a number underneath it, and they do a drawing to see what lucky fan will get to have their picture taken while Taker Tombstones him/her.
Lord of The Curry Posted March 31, 2004 Report Posted March 31, 2004 I think we have a gold mine on our hands, Andrew.
LivingLegendGaryColeman Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 As long as there is no Orlando Jordon feud where Jordan cites that he is the real man from the dark side, I'll just see how this "nostalgia ride" goes.
spman Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 We never got a suitable ending to the Undertaker vs Mr. Hughes feud, maybe they can do something with that. Maybe Nailz and Vince can work out their differences and we can finally get the ending to that feud as well.
The Amazing Rando Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 How about this one...Warrior returns...as a heel!~ Think of the $$$! He could team up with Bradshaw. Destructity Inc. Warrior in a suit spouting out really good stock tips that involve "the power of the Warrior" to rise and grow dominant over the other stocks...except WWE stock, which just kicks out after Warrior's stock pins it for a three.
Guest I Got Banned for Sucking Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 I don't think that The Undertaker will being put in an average feud for quite a while. What do I mean? He'll be squashing guys when he is used.
MillenniumMan831 Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 I only want to see an UT/Morgan feud if Harvey Wippleman comes back to manage Morgan for revenge on UT.
Guest I Got Banned for Sucking Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 I don't want to see Matt Morgan in a feud. I don't want to see Matt Morgan on my television screen full stop.
LivingLegendGaryColeman Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 I only want to see an UT/Morgan feud if Harvey Wippleman comes back to manage Morgan for revenge on UT. I would mark out if Harvey came back and with the talk of establishing managers, he should, but I doubt it...
Guest I Got Banned for Sucking Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 On The Undertaker, the DVD that was released recently to hype his return as The Deadman is one of the worst DVDs that WWE have brought out. Several matches is it.
Guest BDC Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 How about this one...Warrior returns...as a heel!~ Think of the $$$! He could team up with Bradshaw. Destructity Inc. Warrior in a suit spouting out really good stock tips that involve "the power of the Warrior" to rise and grow dominant over the other stocks...except WWE stock, which just kicks out after Warrior's stock pins it for a three. Don't forget the extreme conservative rhetoric about conservative philosophies. That hurt to watch.
Guest Trivia247 Posted April 1, 2004 Report Posted April 1, 2004 could get Snuka to come back out of retirement to do the job again. actually I still am in alittle agreement with people here. Taker should dress more the part if he plans to be full time deadman. Can get past the first showing since, ok make allowances he was buried in those clothes (I guess) But the next time we see him in a bandana.. Mark We know you hated the original gimmick but it made you and the company thousands, millions... At least put up the circa 98 garb then man you don't have to go back to full on oldschool Western Undertaker garb.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now