Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted May 7, 2004 UT destroying two heels really helped get his gimmick of an upstppable monster over Yeah, because everyone saw him as a lowly jobber up until now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Enigma 0 Report post Posted May 7, 2004 UT destroying two heels really helped get his gimmick of an upstppable monster over Yeah, because everyone saw him as a lowly jobber up until now. Yeah, because everyone saw Nunzio and Johnny Stamboli as two stars on the cusp of stardom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted May 7, 2004 I'm interested in starting a weekly article here, if the Gods of TSM would allow me to do so. It's entitled "A Mark's Perspective", a weekly article that accentuates WWE's programs from the views of a total mark, rather than the cynical "WWE sucks and can't do anything right except video packages" typical smark. Gee, because that's NEVER been done before. Every third guest columnist at 411mania does that act. It's just basically a soapbox to brag about how much you marked out over certain things, and most of the time to yell or complain about 'smarks'. Not exactly trailblazing stuff here. Plus, since Raw has actually been, you know, GOOD! Guess what? MOST OF US AREN'T BITCHING ABOUT IT!! Imagine, when WWE is putting out a quality product and we compliment it. DAMN US CYNICAL SMARK BASTARDS!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted May 7, 2004 UT destroying two heels really helped get his gimmick of an upstppable monster over Yeah, because everyone saw him as a lowly jobber up until now. Yeah, because everyone saw Nunzio and Johnny Stamboli as two stars on the cusp of stardom. So, because WWE isn't really doing much with them, it's perfectly okay to do another superfluous job to Taker? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted May 7, 2004 UT destroying two heels really helped get his gimmick of an upstppable monster over Yeah, because everyone saw him as a lowly jobber up until now. Yeah, because everyone saw Nunzio and Johnny Stamboli as two stars on the cusp of stardom. So, because WWE isn't really doing much with them, it's perfectly okay to do another superfluous job to Taker? Johnny (The Bull) Stamboli is a WCW Creation. Nunzio (Little Guido) is known for his ECW fame. Draw your own conclussion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted May 7, 2004 To David Blazenwing: Don't worry...you'll soon learn, as I did, that professional wrestling is not there to be enjoyed. -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted May 7, 2004 Is Stuff actually good at anything? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted May 7, 2004 I'm interested in starting a weekly article here, if the Gods of TSM would allow me to do so. It's entitled "A Mark's Perspective", a weekly article that accentuates WWE's programs from the views of a total mark, rather than the cynical "WWE sucks and can't do anything right except video packages" typical smark. Gee, because that's NEVER been done before. Every third guest columnist at 411mania does that act. It's just basically a soapbox to brag about how much you marked out over certain things, and most of the time to yell or complain about 'smarks'. Not exactly trailblazing stuff here. Plus, since Raw has actually been, you know, GOOD! Guess what? MOST OF US AREN'T BITCHING ABOUT IT!! Imagine, when WWE is putting out a quality product and we compliment it. DAMN US CYNICAL SMARK BASTARDS!!! Well said. I love Raw right now. They're doing a good job with it, and I think most would agree. Hence the lack of bitching. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Is Stuff actually good at anything? Coming up with bad ideas? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gert T 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 I only enjoyed Chavo Classic's reaction after the match. Other than that pointless, but Chavo is logically the only person who can win the belt back from her (insert logical joke). Does it devalue the CW belt though? Yes. And for the record I would have much rather enjoyed a Chavo v. any CW at Judgment Day instead of the re-match! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Enigma 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Jacqueline vs. Chavo on Judgment Day would further make a case for possible Worst PPV of 2004. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EdwardKnoxII 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Jacqueline vs. Chavo on Judgment Day would further make a case for possible Worst PPV of 2004. And to really make it the Worst PPV ever Disco Inferno can help Chavo win the belt from Jackie. And then afterwards Disco and Chavo can become the new Dancing Fools. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Is Stuff actually good at anything? Coming up with bad ideas? Oral and faking orgasms? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EdwardKnoxII 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Is Stuff actually good at anything? Coming up with bad ideas? Oral and faking orgasms? And taking it up the ass? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisMWaters 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Slightly off topic...but there's one thing Stephanie did that I found kinda funny. One show, the camera opens up with her leaning on her desk, her rear right in the camera. She then turns around, and says "Now that I have your attention..." ...it was shortly before she announced Smackdown hired Mr. America. Anyone have a vid/.gif of it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 *smacks Chris* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisMWaters 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 *smacks Chris* HEY! What was that for? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest sanyo Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Jackie as CW champ= ratings! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 At least when Madusa was cruiserweight champion she had Spice accompanying her to the ring. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
notJames 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 *smacks Chris* HEY! What was that for? For suggesting anyone would want to see that big fat ass, let alone keep a photo of it for posterity, *smacks Chris again* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Hot Ticket Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Jackie as CW champ= ratings! eddy is the only thing ever on SD to get ratings so i wouldnt feel too bad if i were jacqueline Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scroby 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Is Stuff actually good at anything? No. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tekcop 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Is Stuff actually good at anything? No. Well.. she does bump well in the ring... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaMarka 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Jacqueline vs. Chavo on Judgment Day would further make a case for possible Worst PPV of 2004. And to really make it the Worst PPV ever Disco Inferno can help Chavo win the belt from Jackie. And then afterwards Disco and Chavo can become the new Dancing Fools. I actually liked the Dancing Fools. I remember the night they formed, they came out and did a beatdown like usual heels. And then, they DANCE~! It was just so absurd that I couldn't help enjoying it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Is Stuff actually good at anything? No. Well.. she does bump well in the ring... Well, she does have plenty of padding HAHAHAHAHA. -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingPK 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Jackie as CW champ= ratings! Um.....no. WWE Smackdown finished with a 2.8 rating this week, down from the already low 3.1 last week. The show faced heavy competition from the final episode of Friends which did a 29.9 rating. The clip show that aired before it did a 22 rating. Hmm, didn't someone call a 2.8 in a certain article on the main page? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Steph is clearly the worst McMahon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Steph is clearly the worst McMahon. Not so Clear. Shane is neck and neck with her. Stuff sabotages people off screen, Shane does it on screen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Steph is clearly the worst McMahon. Not so Clear. Shane is neck and neck with her. Stuff sabotages people off screen, Shane does it on screen. Shane only ruins those in angles with him. Steph can ruin anybody, anytime. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted May 8, 2004 Steph is clearly the worst McMahon. Not so Clear. Shane is neck and neck with her. Stuff sabotages people off screen, Shane does it on screen. Shane only ruins those in angles with him. Steph can ruin anybody, anytime. Anyone that ever gets manhandled by Kane again looks like a fool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
