haVoc 0 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 Obviously it's Ric Flair's child. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. S£im Citrus 0 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 She was Flair's before she was Kane's? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted June 19, 2004 She was Flair's before she was Kane's? She was everybodies before she was Matt's Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Ultimate Fantasy Report post Posted June 19, 2004 Fools Lita's child is Tyson Tomko because he is from the future. TIME TRAVEL=RATINGS! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slickster 0 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 Fools Lita's child is Tyson Tomko because he is from the future. TIME TRAVEL=RATINGS! If they do this, Tomko must refer to Dusty as "President Rhodes." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 if Tomko is the father, will the kid be born with a goatee? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TigerDriver91 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 if Tomko is the father, will the kid be born with a goatee? Yeah, and also horrible tattoos. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 If that involves a Lita heel turn, no thank you. She'd probably be the worst girl heel on the roster. Maybe that'd finally make them change her "rave chick from the trailor park" gimmick. This angle might be considered a success by the WWE. They've created an angle so stupid that there's no obvious rational outcome, thus giving us a reason to tune-in just to see how it'll turn out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted June 19, 2004 By that logic, WWE would put the World Title on...Matt Hardy, and hope for people to tune in to see who squashes him for the belt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 That wouldn't work, because everyone knows it'd be Triple H. From the Observer... They are also doing a Lita pregnancy angle. If that's the case, for credibility, she needs to stop wrestling. Of course the deal will be the question of if Matt Hardy or Kane is the father. They did an insulting segment that brought back WCW flashbacks where Lita took an early pregnancy test and it was positive. She then confided in Stacy Keibler that she was pregnant, but wanted it a secret and not to tell anyone, while it's broadcast on national television. In particular, she didn't want Matt to know. I think they told her to get across the point that she didn't want Matt to know but relied on her to come up with her own words, and she botched it a little bit. It isn't quite WCW, as Jerry Lawler & Jim Ross did acknowledge it, as opposed to having to play dumb, which is a killer to announcers' believability and credibility. But wrestling's track record with pregnancy angles is something like 99% horrible, from the Terri Runnels fake miscarriage, to Mae Young, to that horrible Stacy Keibler WCW pregnancy where Vince Russo was going to be the father and Ric Flair was going to be revealed as Stacy’s real father, thus making David Flair and Stacy romantic siblings. But not just the angle, but the idea people are talking backstage unaware there is a TV camera there, is the stuff that makes you embarrassed to be watching. Makes sense to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TigerDriver91 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 Lita botched something? Say it ain't so... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
