geniusMoment Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 I really enjoyed the show. I still like Sabu, even if he is old. I found his match to be quite enjoyable, and I enjoy almost any Raven angle. The cage was simply awesome. If they can get a prime time slot and put shit like that on the ratings will be higher than RVD on April 20th.
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 I can't believe that nobody went nuts in this thread. This was THE WORST TNA I have ever seen. Nothing in my opinion made it over **1/2 stars and the show just fell totally flat IMO. I have a hard time believing that ANYONE actually liked this show as it was probably the most boring....clusterfuck of a TNA show ever.
Guest whitemilesdavis Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 My cable service stopped offering the Pay per view, so I don't get to watch it right away anymore. Looks like I'll skip the effort of finding this one now. I thought Impact was at it's weakest last Friday too. Not a good trend.
RedJed Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 I can't believe that nobody went nuts in this thread. This was THE WORST TNA I have ever seen. Nothing in my opinion made it over **1/2 stars and the show just fell totally flat IMO. I have a hard time believing that ANYONE actually liked this show as it was probably the most boring....clusterfuck of a TNA show ever. I dunno, I thought the first hour was pretty brutal. But the second hour was pretty good all around with Sabu-Abyss being ok with Raven's run-in, the tag match w/ Lynn and Co. was alright for sure, the Hardy/Brown/Jarrett angle kind of was "eh" with the typical Jarrett guitar shot, but still a worthy angle - TNA doesnt do enough angles that are memorable and this was an exception. I have to totally take task on calling this a bad show in relation to the main event though. They went 15 minutes and with that (somewhat) limited time, they really delivered strong and turned it into a TNA MOTY candidate for sure. 9 out of 10 times those two teams have solid matches with each other and in this case, they really went balls out on that one to have a really awesome match. I'd have no problem giving it ****, more if they would have just had 5-10 more minutes. Next week sounds interesting with Ultimate X 4 and I'm intriuged in Hardy v. Brown for some odd reason too. BTW Dynamite.......still wanting to do a trade soon, but still havent found time to get my site updated, UGH
Guest The Last Free Voice Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 Okay, I still have to watch the Sabu/Abyss match, but aside from that I got most of it taken care of. Pretty average show overall. Top match was the cage, which i gave *** first viewing, i don't htink that will change, but ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN IN... uh.. .TNA. Yea. Aside from that, pretty underwhelming show. EDIT: And did I see James Storm bust out a FUCKING STIENER SCREWDRIVER? Or were my eyes decieving me?
TheBigSwigg Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 Honestly, though, there has barely ever been an angle that's been built and executed well on TNA. I remember when the Gathering turned on Raven. I was watching the match, thinking "what the hell?" They try, but they can't truly execute angles well, that's one of their biggest faults. It's partly the writers, partly the wrestlers, and partly the commentary. No single group or person is to blame. As for the fact that the ME only got 15 minutes, that's my other huge problem with TNA. The reason they haven't had many 4*+ matches has a lot to do with the fact that they try to cram a ton of matches onto a card with a ME that is written as a blowoff, or a huge match. Their ME usually gets about 15-25 minutes, and that's not always a good idea. I would prefer them to give them 45 mins, and have a standby match in case it doesn't go the length, just like old school NWA.
Guest The Last Free Voice Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 Swigg, did i just see you say you wanted to see AMW vs the Naturals for FOURTY FIVE MINUTES? But I do agree sometimes they cut short main event matches. Like Any of AJ's defenses.
TheBigSwigg Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 Swigg, did i just see you say you wanted to see AMW vs the Naturals for FOURTY FIVE MINUTES? But I do agree sometimes they cut short main event matches. Like Any of AJ's defenses. Not necessarily, but yes. I'm always impressed by the Naturals. More so than AMW. The point was more of a general ME comment, not necessarily about last night. About last night: YOUR MOM WAS GREAT! (See WMD, you're not the only one.)
Guest The Last Free Voice Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 My mom died in a car accident when I was 11.
TheBigSwigg Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 If that's true, then that's the 5th time I've pulled a Your Mom joke on someone who's mom was dead.
Guest The Last Free Voice Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 It's true. You have incredible luck with that sort of thing i guess.
TheBigSwigg Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 Wow. You'd think I'd stop after the first four, but no. I need a new joke.
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 I have to totally take task on calling this a bad show in relation to the main event though. They went 15 minutes and with that (somewhat) limited time, they really delivered strong and turned it into a TNA MOTY candidate for sure. 9 out of 10 times those two teams have solid matches with each other and in this case, they really went balls out on that one to have a really awesome match. I'd have no problem giving it ****, more if they would have just had 5-10 more minutes. BTW Dynamite.......still wanting to do a trade soon, but still havent found time to get my site updated, UGH ****? ****? Jed, are you kidding me here? I WOULD not or COULD not give that match **** if my life depended on it. It was a slow moving, slow building tag match in a six sided cage!!!!! These guys didn't even have be believing that they were bleeding when Tenay first called it. I was like, "They are bleeding! WTF? They haven't done anything to bleed." I really was looking forward to seeing this match and I don't think it would fair to compare it to the AMW/XXX cage match as this one wasn't even half as good as that one. Keep in mind this is coming from someone who thinks many people even overrate the original cage match. I do like the Naturals and AMW is simply "nothing special", but this performance was a poor one on the part of both teams. I found myself thinking after Stevens did the moonsault(or was it Douglas?) off the cage and really noticing how much everyone was bleeding......I kind of felt bad that they were doing highspots and bleeding everywhere...........and the match was still bad. p.s. - Jed, soon as you get that bad boy updated......I'm all for a trade!!!!! WHOO HOO!!!!!!
Guest The Last Free Voice Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 DK, since we usually have opposing veiwpoints on some of TNA's major thing, what would you say to doing an AIM thing like Laz and I did before he quit? I think that would work.. And I know I probibly should have PMed this, but to late. CALL OUT.
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 DK, since we usually have opposing veiwpoints on some of TNA's major thing, what would you say to doing an AIM thing like Laz and I did before he quit? I think that would work.. And I know I probibly should have PMed this, but to late. CALL OUT. Sure, I'd have no problem doing it.....the only thing is....I don't order EVERYWEEK. As long as I've seen the show.....I'd be glad to do it.
RedJed Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 I have to totally take task on calling this a bad show in relation to the main event though. They went 15 minutes and with that (somewhat) limited time, they really delivered strong and turned it into a TNA MOTY candidate for sure. 9 out of 10 times those two teams have solid matches with each other and in this case, they really went balls out on that one to have a really awesome match. I'd have no problem giving it ****, more if they would have just had 5-10 more minutes. BTW Dynamite.......still wanting to do a trade soon, but still havent found time to get my site updated, UGH ****? ****? Jed, are you kidding me here? I WOULD not or COULD not give that match **** if my life depended on it. It was a slow moving, slow building tag match in a six sided cage!!!!! These guys didn't even have be believing that they were bleeding when Tenay first called it. I was like, "They are bleeding! WTF? They haven't done anything to bleed." I really was looking forward to seeing this match and I don't think it would fair to compare it to the AMW/XXX cage match as this one wasn't even half as good as that one. Keep in mind this is coming from someone who thinks many people even overrate the original cage match. I do like the Naturals and AMW is simply "nothing special", but this performance was a poor one on the part of both teams. I found myself thinking after Stevens did the moonsault(or was it Douglas?) off the cage and really noticing how much everyone was bleeding......I kind of felt bad that they were doing highspots and bleeding everywhere...........and the match was still bad. p.s. - Jed, soon as you get that bad boy updated......I'm all for a trade!!!!! WHOO HOO!!!!!! Ok.......so I just watched it again this afternoon and my **** was a little high (my excuse was that I was rather drunk), but I still think *** 1/4 is a fair assessment IMO. The first 5 minutes were REALLY slow and the crowd was dead - maybe because of the on and off (more off, admittngly) stuff they did this week. However, at some point the match really picked up and delivered to me. Very well done nearfalls too. But to each their own! I'll let ya know when I get it updated......did get some more new ROH in lately though, just as an FYI if you're interested.
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 Ok.......so I just watched it again this afternoon and my **** was a little high (my excuse was that I was rather drunk), but I still think *** 1/4 is a fair assessment IMO. The first 5 minutes were REALLY slow and the crowd was dead - maybe because of the on and off (more off, admittngly) stuff they did this week. However, at some point the match really picked up and delivered to me. Very well done nearfalls too. But to each their own! I'll let ya know when I get it updated......did get some more new ROH in lately though, just as an FYI if you're interested. Your drunkeness is all good. I would put the match at **1/2 simply because I expected a LOT more out of all four of these guys and I don't mean spots either. The interference was pointless. The match was WAY too over booked.
TheBigSwigg Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 The interference was pointless. The match was WAY too over booked. Isn't that the story with nearly every TNA main event, though?
Magus Posted July 22, 2004 Report Posted July 22, 2004 i'm looking at the ringside photos here... and maybe its this picture i'm looking at, but did Raven look kinda fat? you can't totally see b/c of the shirt, but he almost looks like he did in his 2nd ECW run. let me know if i'm wrong love the Sandman shirt, though. ALWAYS count on Raven to represent.
Guest MikeSC Posted July 23, 2004 Report Posted July 23, 2004 ****? ****? Jed, are you kidding me here? I WOULD not or COULD not give that match **** if my life depended on it. We now go to DK's house. A man has a gun pointed at DK while another man has found a girlfriend for him, but is threatening to rape her if he does not give the match 4 1/2 stars. She's cute --- and a little weak in the whole eyesight department --- so DK is in like Flynt, baby! Now, does anybody else here think he wouldn't give it 4 stars? Potential for getting head for 4 stars --- or holding onto one's integrity and getting killed while watching your girlfriend to be be violated in ways not even porn film freaks could fathom. Think about it. -=Mike ...Selling out since the womb...
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted July 23, 2004 Report Posted July 23, 2004 ****? ****? Jed, are you kidding me here? I WOULD not or COULD not give that match **** if my life depended on it. We now go to DK's house. A man has a gun pointed at DK while another man has found a girlfriend for him, but is threatening to rape her if he does not give the match 4 1/2 stars. She's cute --- and a little weak in the whole eyesight department --- so DK is in like Flynt, baby! Now, does anybody else here think he wouldn't give it 4 stars? Potential for getting head for 4 stars --- or holding onto one's integrity and getting killed while watching your girlfriend to be be violated in ways not even porn film freaks could fathom. Think about it. -=Mike ...Selling out since the womb... Good going Mike. Your streak of making me laugh has ended........and it will never happen again.......and Jeff Jarrett would not come to my house........
The Buzz Posted July 23, 2004 Report Posted July 23, 2004 i'm looking at the ringside photos here... and maybe its this picture i'm looking at, but did Raven look kinda fat? you can't totally see b/c of the shirt, but he almost looks like he did in his 2nd ECW run. let me know if i'm wrong love the Sandman shirt, though. ALWAYS count on Raven to represent. He just came off of pneumonia from what I have been hearing, plus that rib injury before that. So he probably hasn't been in the gym all that much lately.
Magus Posted July 23, 2004 Report Posted July 23, 2004 i'm looking at the ringside photos here... and maybe its this picture i'm looking at, but did Raven look kinda fat? you can't totally see b/c of the shirt, but he almost looks like he did in his 2nd ECW run. let me know if i'm wrong love the Sandman shirt, though. ALWAYS count on Raven to represent. He just came off of pneumonia from what I have been hearing, plus that rib injury before that. So he probably hasn't been in the gym all that much lately. makes perfect sense. now why didn't i think of that?
Guest The Last Free Voice Posted July 23, 2004 Report Posted July 23, 2004 For those who care, the Rush is in progress. I'll take a break to watch Impact, but aside from that, the Rush is all I have to do today. So it should get done by tonight.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now