The Gene Snitsky love

[J. Hungerford Smith 0]

I agree, the Bush comment was off the beaten path, he at least has somewhat of an argument relative to the folder, regardless of how unnecessary it was to make the argument. This is the WWE folder not a political forum.

[NYU 0]

Stevey, I'm getting quite confused with your policies here.

 

You hate Bush, despite the fact that he's against abortions.

 

You hate Snitsky, despite the fact that he's become quite talented at causing abortions.

 

Decide what side of the fence you're standing on. You're not going to win the TSM election if you keep this up....

[Guest SteveyP93]

I agree, the Bush comment was off the beaten path, he at least has somewhat of an argument relative to the folder, regardless of how unnecessary it was to make the argument. This is the WWE folder not a political forum.

 

Well, Grenier started that with his INXS comment. INXS hasn't even posted in this topic. Grenier made it a Republicans vs. Democrats/Independents thing.

[Guest GreatOne]

And then there's Stevey, who IS a................

 

Aw, like Mick Foley to Al Snow, I just don't have the heart for it.

[Guest SteveyP93]

Snitsky didn't kill the bebe, Kane killed the bebe.

[bob_barron 0]

SteveyP93 is one of the dumbest posters on this board if that Bush Hitler sig was any indication.

 

Snitsky rules

[Guest SteveyP93]

 

You're one to talk, you creepy little bastard.

 

You can't even wash your face in the morning or wear a fucking baseball cap correctly.

[bob_barron 0]

OH TAG!

 

Since I've never really seen what you look like I can't really comment but you don't sound like a very bright individual

[Guest SteveyP93]

You saw "Mean Girls" and I'm guessing you enjoyed it.

 

I don't need to say anything else about your intelligence...or lack thereof.

[bob_barron 0]

Did you see the movie? Probably not.

 

Mean Girls actually was a major critical success (87% RT rating I think)but feel free to keep looking like a major jackass.

[Guest SteveyP93]

Mean Girls actually was a major critical success (87% RT rating I think)but feel free to keep looking like a major jackass.

 

And it's success means WHAT? That it was a good film? That intelligent people went to see it?

 

Give me a fucking break...you know damn well that any piece of crap that Hollywood squeezes out becomes #1 at the box office. Just look at AvP.

 

America has bad taste in movies. That's not exactly news.

 

Celebrity worship in this country is at epidemic levels...I'm sure you're very aware of that, though, since you're one of the biggest pop culture whores I've ever seen in my life.

 

And no, I didn't see it, because I majored in media criticism and I'm trained to see garbage for garbage. I have taste and intelligence and I don't give a fuck about Lindsay Lohan.

 

Your basis for my "low intelligence" seems to be that I disagree with you...that's pretty weak, but I guess that's pretty much the standard here at TSM.

[SamoaRowe 0]

This thread has somehow made me nostalgic for the days of "Dave O'Neil, Journalist vs Everyone Else" threads that used to show up. Wow, those were amusing.

[bob_barron 0]

And it's success means WHAT? That it was a good film? That intelligent people went to see it?

 

I said it was a critical success you fucking moron. Meaning: The critics liked it. And it was a commercial sucess.

 

This generally means good film.

 

Give me a fucking break...you know damn well that any piece of crap that Hollywood squeezes out becomes #1 at the box office. Just look at AvP.

 

I SAID IT WAS A CRITICAL SUCCESS. Never brought up its box office.

 

And no, I didn't see it, because I majored in media criticism and I'm trained to see garbage for garbage. I have taste and intelligence and I don't give a fuck about Lindsay Lohan.

 

Do you want a cookie? I didn't give a fuck about her either before I saw the film. In fact I hated LL before I saw the movie having hated every movie she made up to that point. But Mean Girls was a good movie.

 

Your basis for my "low intelligence" seems to be that I disagree with you...that's pretty weak, but I guess that's pretty much the standard here at TSM.

 

My basis for low intelligence is your posts here at TSM.

[Guest netslob]

And it's success means WHAT? That it was a good film? That intelligent people went to see it?

 

Give me a fucking break...you know damn well that any piece of crap that Hollywood squeezes out becomes #1 at the box office. Just look at AvP.

 

America has bad taste in movies. That's not exactly news.

 

Celebrity worship in this country is at epidemic levels...I'm sure you're very aware of that, though, since you're one of the biggest pop culture whores I've ever seen in my life.

 

And no, I didn't see it, because I majored in media criticism and I'm trained to see garbage for garbage. I have taste and intelligence and I don't give a fuck about Lindsay Lohan.

 

sooooo, you KNOW it's a bad movie...without having actually SEEN it? ooo-Kay...

 

 

Your basis for my "low intelligence" seems to be that I disagree with you...that's pretty weak, but I guess that's pretty much the standard here at TSM.

 

this coming from the guy who started a thread degrading all the people who disagreed with him about Snitsky. yes, you are quite intelligent, my friend. the world needs more well-read, open-minded people like you.

[Guest SteveyP93]

The critics liked it. And it was a commercial sucess.

 

This generally means good film.

 

 

I understood the critical success part. Since when is Ebert or E! credible? Please.

[bob_barron 0]

This is just sad.

[Guest GreatOne]

The critics liked it. And it was a commercial sucess.

 

This generally means good film.

 

 

I understood the critical success part. Since when is Ebert or E! credible? Please.

Or since when are *YOU* credible?

[Guest TonyJaymzV1]

damnit, greatone took what i was going to say.

 

 

okay, on topic, people like Snitsky because he's different and he's come out of the blue. He's the only frehs thing about Raw.

 

and so what if people like someone? Shit, you should know that, majoring in "Media Criticism".

 

What the fuck is that by the way? Your goal in life is to make sarcastic comments about stuff? Be a professional critic and rake in all the dollers tell people this is better than that?

 

Looks like Skeith 2.0

[jester 0]

For starting such a dead end thread, you asked for it:

 

IT'S NOT OUR FAULT WE ARE ALL SNITSKY MARKS!!!

 

(Meancing Stare)

We need to be punished for liking Snitski. So tonight, in this very ring, we all face...KAAANNNEEE...

[Enigma 0]

SteveyP93 needs to get laid.

[Guest The Decadent Slacker]

On topic: I enjoy Snitsky because he & the angle are so bad it's become entertainment. His promos are just mind blowing because he's almost a parody of the kind of guys WWE brings up (see Tomko, Tyson). That, his pubic goatee, & his really amusing facials make me enjoy him from a sheer guily pleasure perspective.

 

Off topic: I keep picturing Regal & Bush arguing when Barron & Stevey go at it.

[thecitythesky 0]

I agree, the Bush comment was off the beaten path, he at least has somewhat of an argument relative to the folder, regardless of how unnecessary it was to make the argument. This is the WWE folder not a political forum.

 

Well, Grenier started that with his INXS comment. INXS hasn't even posted in this topic. Grenier made it a Republicans vs. Democrats/Independents thing.

*

 

if you're going to insult everyone's intelligence in this thread...

i'd recommend you do your best to not sound like an idiot.

 

as someone who always has,

and will continue to, vote for a third party...

 

i whole-heartedly resent the implication that i'm somehow on your side.

because if i were...

 

i'd vote for your guy.

 

that is all.

[MillenniumMan831 0]

For starting such a dead end thread, you asked for it:

 

IT'S NOT OUR FAULT WE ARE ALL SNITSKY MARKS!!!

 

(Meancing Stare)

We need to be punished for liking Snitski. So tonight, in this very ring, we all face...KAAANNNEEE...

Awww C'mon, NOT Kane! ANYONE but Kane!

[Guest Dynamite Kido]

Jesus Christ......this thread has fucktard written all over it.

[cabbageboy 0]

Dude, voting for a 3rd party as a statement is just sooooo 2000!

Heh.

 

Here's the thing about the Snitsky love: I don't think it's meant as irony. I think a lot of people on here really like this insane angle. Hell, the Kane/Snitsky feud is the main reason I'm tuning in to Raw lately (how sad is that?). I think the reason is that it's one of those totally out of nowhere, unpredictable angles. I have no fucking idea where this is going.

 

So while there might be a few Snitsky poseurs on this board, the rest are Snitsky marks~!

[AndrewTS 0]

The critics liked it. And it was a commercial sucess.

 

This generally means good film.

 

 

I understood the critical success part. Since when is Ebert or E! credible? Please.

Never, but those aren't the only ones who liked it. Ebert gave Van Helsing *** but it still has a low rating at rottentomatoes.com.

 

I have no interest in any of Tina Fey's projects but I'd still give it the benefit of the doubt.

 

I think Snitsky's love is much the same as the love you see for characters on MST3K movies. He's so horrible he's awesome.

 

Off topic: I keep picturing Regal & Bush arguing when Barron & Stevey go at it.

 

Now THAT's funny.

[Guest Mickey Al]

Place needs more HeidenLOVE. Get going...

 

Heidenreich vs Snitsky is gold. JUST GOLD!

[Australian Pride 0]

So while there might be a few Snitsky poseurs on this board, the rest are Snitsky marks~!

I think him starting a thread and asking us all to stop loving Snitsky has actually done the opposite and made people like Gene Snitsky more.

[Downhome 0]

I have two questions.

 

1) Why is this thread still plowing on?

 

2) Why in the hell hasn't SteveyP93 entered the land of the forgotten (banned from WWE forum) yet?

[bob_barron 0]

Gene Snitsky and the Lita-Kane-Snitsky angle is the funniest thing to happen on RAW in a while.

 

People need to accept that