Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2004 Brit Hume used this question leading into the Fox News All-Star's segment. Which is worse voters being disenfranchised or people being allowed to vote more than once? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2004 Voting more than once. "Disenfranchised" is a loaded question -- what does it mean exactly? Police dogs attacking you as you try to get into your voting booth -- yes. Not being allowed to vote because you're too stupid to figure out where your polling place is, or that you forgot to get registered before your state's deadline expires -- no... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tom 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2004 Voting more than once. I'm with the Colonel in thinking that "disenfranchised" is a loaded term. Convicted felons are disenfranchised by law, and while I don't necessarily agree with that, I think someone voting more than once is worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted October 20, 2004 What about dead people finding the power to vote Democrat every election? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 20, 2004 What about dead people finding the power to vote Democrat every election? I have a bigger problem with Kerry having 6 teams of lawyers ready to file suits on the eve of the election to try and switch the results, as they nearly did in 2000. They plan on trying to paint the Republicans as trying to steal the election --- whether it's accurate or not. http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041020/D85R51DG3.html BTW, Kerry plans on declaring victory --- whether it's true or not. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted October 20, 2004 It's a stupid mistake on his part. You can only fuck over stock market investors so many times before it bites your party in the ass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 20, 2004 A few things need to happen: 1) Fuck "provisional ballots". If you aren't at the correct precinct, that is your damned problem. Call the election commission to see where you should go --- or just read the paper, which tends to have that information. 2) A database for voters MUST be created, immediately. One that permits immediate removal of invalid voters and where mistakes in purges can be quickly remedied. 3) NO city should get more than 5% more ballots than they have registered voters (Milwaukee has requested TWICE as many ballots as they have registered voters). 4) SEVERE penalties for anybody filing AND filling out fraudulent registration forms. Make this obvious crime a major crime. 5) No campaign official should be permitted to be NEAR a polling place. They can vote and then they must leave. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2004 A few things need to happen: 1) Fuck "provisional ballots". If you aren't at the correct precinct, that is your damned problem. Call the election commission to see where you should go --- or just read the paper, which tends to have that information. 2) A database for voters MUST be created, immediately. One that permits immediate removal of invalid voters and where mistakes in purges can be quickly remedied. 3) NO city should get more than 5% more ballots than they have registered voters (Milwaukee has requested TWICE as many ballots as they have registered voters). 4) SEVERE penalties for anybody filing AND filling out fraudulent registration forms. Make this obvious crime a major crime. 5) No campaign official should be permitted to be NEAR a polling place. They can vote and then they must leave. -=Mike how about requiring every single voting machine/booth to leave a paper trail or receipt if you will, of the voter's vote. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 20, 2004 how about requiring every single voting machine/booth to leave a paper trail or receipt if you will, of the voter's vote. Nope. Making it a legal requirement will be a nightmare, since printers do go down. Besides, I thought we wanted to go to machines since paper was so unreliable. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2004 how about requiring every single voting machine/booth to leave a paper trail or receipt if you will, of the voter's vote. Nope. Making it a legal requirement will be a nightmare, since printers do go down. Besides, I thought we wanted to go to machines since paper was so unreliable. -=Mike so having backup printers available would be that difficult? And, no paper trails highly increases the chance for voter fraud. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 20, 2004 how about requiring every single voting machine/booth to leave a paper trail or receipt if you will, of the voter's vote. Nope. Making it a legal requirement will be a nightmare, since printers do go down. Besides, I thought we wanted to go to machines since paper was so unreliable. -=Mike so having backup printers available would be that difficult? And, no paper trails highly increases the chance for voter fraud. There can be fraud with paper trails, too. And, I can speak from my days of registering for classes --- if you want to guarantee that voting will take HOURS, insist that printers must give out a receipt. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tom 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2004 As someone who's worked with printers quite a bit in the last six years, yes, it would be rather nightmarish. You'd have to have at least one IT guy at every polling place in the country, never mind the spare paper and toner you'd need. The costs would be thru the roof, and all it would do is gum up a process that's already pretty gummy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 21, 2004 As someone who's worked with printers quite a bit in the last six years, yes, it would be rather nightmarish. You'd have to have at least one IT guy at every polling place in the country, never mind the spare paper and toner you'd need. The costs would be thru the roof, and all it would do is gum up a process that's already pretty gummy. And God cannot even imagine what the poll "observers" will do when the printers go down. The conspiracy theories and claims of intimidation would NEVER end. -=Mike ...Who's learning that, apparently, asking people questions equates to "intimidation"... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted October 21, 2004 how about requiring every single voting machine/booth to leave a paper trail or receipt if you will, of the voter's vote. So people can find out who you voted for? Jeez, Mike. I thought ASHCROFT was bad... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
