Jump to content

ShouldThe Democrats Concede?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. ShouldThe Democrats Concede?

    • Yes
      23
    • No
      17


Recommended Posts

Posted
Wouldn't McCain be like 100 years old in 2008?

 

Rudy is the best choice since he can win New York. And if he wins NY- it's over

Winning New York would be good but, in order to guarantee victory, they'd have to pick up a good chunk of the South and Midwest as well.

 

 

While those are currently VERY pro-Republican, that could change if the party's platform goes far enough to the left and the Democrats move enough to the center.

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Winning New York gives you 31 electoral votes.

 

So that makes up any losses in the South. And Rudy could win New Jersey and PA as well easily offsetting anything

Isn't it a wash, given that they'd probably lose Texas in the process? Rudy's way too far left to be taken seriously in the South and Midwest.

Posted
Winning New York gives you 31 electoral votes.

 

So that makes up any losses in the South. And Rudy could win New Jersey and PA as well easily offsetting anything

33 in New York is a lot, but that may not fully counteract losses in Louisiana (9), Mississippi (6), North Carolina (11), South Carolina (8), Florida (27), etc.

 

 

They wouldn't lose the whole South BUT they may lose enough to cancel out the gains there and in New Jersey or Pennsylvania.

Guest thebigjig
Posted
Winning New York gives you 31 electoral votes.

 

So that makes up any losses in the South. And Rudy could win New Jersey and PA as well easily offsetting anything

Isn't it a wash, given that they'd probably lose Texas in the process? Rudy's way too far left to be taken seriously in the South and Midwest.

Rudy's actually pretty liked in the South as well as the rest of the country... it's just his opinion on gay rights that would cause many to think twice. However, he'll flip flop if the party pressures him to. He'll have to in order to secure the nomination

Posted

I suppose the major question would be who would the Dems run? I'd like to think they'd hold onto Obama for a while, namely because he doesn't have any experience yet, but that didn't stop them with Edwards.

 

I would suggest not running Hillary, too. I've heard enough stories from people that worked in the Arkansas legislature about her that she would get slaughtered.

Posted
Winning New York gives you 31 electoral votes.

 

So that makes up any losses in the South. And Rudy could win New Jersey and PA as well easily offsetting anything

33 in New York is a lot, but that may not fully counteract losses in Louisiana (9), Mississippi (6), North Carolina (11), South Carolina (8), Florida (27), etc.

 

 

They wouldn't lose the whole South BUT they may lose enough to cancel out the gains there and in New Jersey or Pennsylvania.

But if they don't for Rudy- who do they vote for?

 

The Democrat who will probably be pro everything else that Rudy is?

 

I think the 9/11 factor would put Rudy over the top

Posted
Winning New York gives you 31 electoral votes.

 

So that makes up any losses in the South. And Rudy could win New Jersey and PA as well easily offsetting anything

33 in New York is a lot, but that may not fully counteract losses in Louisiana (9), Mississippi (6), North Carolina (11), South Carolina (8), Florida (27), etc.

 

 

They wouldn't lose the whole South BUT they may lose enough to cancel out the gains there and in New Jersey or Pennsylvania.

But if they don't for Rudy- who do they vote for?

 

The Democrat who will probably be pro everything else that Rudy is?

 

I think the 9/11 factor would put Rudy over the top

The discussion is moot anyway. I doubt he'd even get past the primaries.

Guest Banders Kennany
Posted

I think Dog Rudy will end up edging out McCain in the primaries and pick up Good Old Thisclose Pataki as a running mate. Obama is a good suggestion for as to who might the Dems will pick, as he is definitely a Democratic star in the making and rising with the speed of a meteor. Keyes is a weak candidate, and a minority which hurts against more racial voters. He is a multi-time loser, and was a ringer brought out to kill Obama, but he was turned the tables on.

Posted
I suppose the major question would be who would the Dems run? I'd like to think they'd hold onto Obama for a while, namely because he doesn't have any experience yet, but that didn't stop them with Edwards.

 

I would suggest not running Hillary, too. I've heard enough stories from people that worked in the Arkansas legislature about her that she would get slaughtered.

You could be mean and notice that Bush's margin of victory in NC was identical to what it was 4 years ago.

 

Edwards --- He Delivers!

-=Mike

Posted
You could be mean and notice that Bush's margin of victory in NC was identical to what it was 4 years ago.

 

Edwards --- He Delivers!

  -=Mike

After working for the AP last night and taking five gajillion katrillion billion million calls from NC, I'll guess they were unmotivated to go to the polls and vote for Edwards guy because their ballot is 5 kajillion pages long.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...