SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted December 22, 2004 I am sure that rumor has caused all of those women great distress, especially since they all seem so classly. By the way, I was being sarcastic. By and large, they are a group of complete sluts. How does appearing in skimpy outfits to intentionally fuel the masturbation fantasies of millions of men make you a slut? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
geniusMoment 0 Report post Posted December 22, 2004 I am sure that rumor has caused all of those women great distress, especially since they all seem so classly. By the way, I was being sarcastic. By and large, they are a group of complete sluts. How does appearing in skimpy outfits to intentionally fuel the masturbation fantasies of millions of men make you a slut? They just where those outfits because they feel normal clothes are too constricting. Thats why when they rip the clothes off of each other, they are not doing it to forward some agenda that says T&A needs to featured, no, they are liberating each other, freeing themselves of the shackles placed on them by the man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted December 22, 2004 They just where those outfits because they feel normal clothes are too constricting. Thats why when they rip the clothes off of each other, they are not doing it to forward some agenda that says T&A needs to featured, no, they are liberating each other, freeing themselves of the shackles placed on them by the man. Aw, yes, I see. Britney Spears logic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo Effect 0 Report post Posted December 22, 2004 I got this in Wrestling365's newletter. 1Wrestling.com ran a story on Tuesday stating that a number of WWE Divas were confirmed for an upcoming Playboy shoot, actually naming specific women. That story is totally false, and I'm told, has caused upset and distress to some of the women named and their families. I talked to one of the women supposedly "confirmed" for a Playboy shoot earlier today and she didn't know anything about As most W365 readers will remember I put out a story in October (W365 issue #266) revealing that Playboy were in talks with WWE reps for a pictorial to coincide with Wrestlemania 21. At this point nothing has been confimed. W365 is the worst newsletter I've ever read. I love it. Every other story, he talks about his "secret sources" and such, even though you know none exists and he's just some mark changing stories around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LatinAssasin 0 Report post Posted December 22, 2004 I got this in Wrestling365's newletter. 1Wrestling.com ran a story on Tuesday stating that a number of WWE Divas were confirmed for an upcoming Playboy shoot, actually naming specific women. That story is totally false, and I'm told, has caused upset and distress to some of the women named and their families. I talked to one of the women supposedly "confirmed" for a Playboy shoot earlier today and she didn't know anything about As most W365 readers will remember I put out a story in October (W365 issue #266) revealing that Playboy were in talks with WWE reps for a pictorial to coincide with Wrestlemania 21. At this point nothing has been confimed. W365 is the worst newsletter I've ever read. I love it. Every other story, he talks about his "secret sources" and such, even though you know none exists and he's just some mark changing stories around. Well, he's been right pretty much every time he puts something in there, so I'll take his word on it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dips 0 Report post Posted December 22, 2004 Why haven't PWInsider, WObserver or PWTorch reported anything yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunter's Torn Quad 0 Report post Posted December 22, 2004 Why haven't PWInsider, WObserver or PWTorch reported anything yet? Probably because they already knew it was a non-story. If the rumor gets too widespread, then one of them will say something about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted December 23, 2004 Well [name deleted] is talking about it on his blog, so you KNOW it has to be true now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo Effect 0 Report post Posted December 23, 2004 I got this in Wrestling365's newletter. 1Wrestling.com ran a story on Tuesday stating that a number of WWE Divas were confirmed for an upcoming Playboy shoot, actually naming specific women. That story is totally false, and I'm told, has caused upset and distress to some of the women named and their families. I talked to one of the women supposedly "confirmed" for a Playboy shoot earlier today and she didn't know anything about As most W365 readers will remember I put out a story in October (W365 issue #266) revealing that Playboy were in talks with WWE reps for a pictorial to coincide with Wrestlemania 21. At this point nothing has been confimed. W365 is the worst newsletter I've ever read. I love it. Every other story, he talks about his "secret sources" and such, even though you know none exists and he's just some mark changing stories around. Well, he's been right pretty much every time he puts something in there, so I'll take his word on it. The majority of it is... "PWInsider is reporting that Triple H is angering several people backstage with his attitude as of a late. A source at the company told W365 that 'His ego is just very inflated right now and he's very difficult to deal with.'" Facts are rarely in his reports. If 1wrestling and such refute the story soon, I'll give him credit, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Sturgis Report post Posted December 28, 2004 Here is an update for those interested in the WWE Divas/Playboy rumors. Apperently, the source is a photographer with connections with Playboy that has posted on the www.cndb.com message board, which is a celebrity nudity database/reference site. By the looks of his postings, the guy seems to have some valid information, particularly when looking at the other information that he has posted regarding this rumored Playboy spread. Here are the relevant posts the source has made in regards to his story. On Dec. 20, "Photographer" posted: They are negotiating right now with the WWE to do a Women of the WWE issue, so far the only Divas that have agreed is Torrie Wilson, Dawn Marie, Miss Jackie, Victoria, Christy Hemme, Joy, Amy Weber, Michelle McCool, and Lilian Garcia, they are still trying to get Lita, Molly Holly, Stephanie McMahon, Ivory, and one other. Trish Stratus, Stacy Keibler and someone else said no. On Dec. 26, "Photographer" posted a follow up to this rumor with a lot of details. I found out this week that Stacy Keibler and Molly Holly have both agreed. But both have stipulations. Molly will only appear topless and nothing else will be shown, however, her hands will be covering her breasts in the photo. Kind of like the old Janet Jackson Rolling Stone Issue. Stacy Keibler will show her legs and BUTT in the pictorial but nothing else. So most likely it will be shot from behind with her turning towards the camera wearing a shirt. With Playboy okay with these stipulations it is now possible that both Trish Stratus and Stephanie McMahon will appear but with provisions like Stacy and Molly. Stephanie wants to appear but has only agreed to be wearing something sexy or see-through, and Trish said she would agree along the same lines. No word on Ivory, as of this point it looks like she will not pose at all. The pictorial is said to be over at least 10 pages, and will hit newsstands around July, not August like originally planned. Another post.... Sorry I forgot about Lita. Lita is confirmed and will appear all-nude in the pictorial. And in one last post to recap.... OK here is the info I gathered about the WWE Women: Victoria -Topless & Full Frontal Dawn Marie - Topless & Full Frontal Miss Jackie - Topless Only/Lingerie Stacy Keibler - Ass and Back only Stephanie McMahon - See-through Nightie/Lingerie Michelle McCool - Topless & Full Frontal Amy Weber - Topless & Full Frontal Maria - Topless only Lita - Still Negotiating Poses Joy Giovanni - Topless & Full Frontal Christy Hemme - Topless & Ass only Candace - Topless & Full Frontal Torrie Wilson - Topless Only/Lingerie Lilian Garcia - See-Through Nightie/Lingerie Molly Holly - Topless Only/Lingerie Please Note, that the Spread is 10 pages, however some of the Divas will only appear once, while others may get one or two pages. For the time being, we should take this as rumors until it is confirmed by WWE or Dave Meltzer or someone like that. You should decide for yourself if you believe these rumors are true, but I think there is a great possibility that these rumors are indeed true. Credit: LordsofPain.net Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. S£im Citrus 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2004 ... Molly will only appear topless and nothing else will be shown, however, her hands will be covering her breasts in the photo. Kind of like the old Janet Jackson Rolling Stone Issue... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dazed Report post Posted December 29, 2004 Yeah, let's put this retarded shit out of it's misery until somethign concrete is confirmed. Which it won't be. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest LooneyTune Report post Posted December 29, 2004 LordsofPain... yeah, THATS A Credible source. Like that rumor of Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels at Wrestlemania XIX. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Sturgis Report post Posted December 29, 2004 I didn't say it was credible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest LooneyTune Report post Posted December 29, 2004 I know, but in general. LordsofPain is as credible as asking a drunk bum from the streets who never watched wrestling in his life... actually, I think the bum has LoP beat because some guesses actually come true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites