Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 Expect the unexpected with Denny Green. He'll probably take Braylon Edwards or another WR. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Failed Mascot Report post Posted January 4, 2005 Cards have two great young WRs. I could see Denny Green grabbing Jason Cambell if he doesn't take a running back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the pinjockey 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 I think he should take Chris Rix with the no. 5 pick. One more thing for the Eagles, is they need to draft a backup QB and not one of the Holmgren disciple sixth round project types. They need to use a third or fourth rounder on a Greene/White/LeFors level player. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 I'd heard Jammal Brown would go in the Top 10. I doubt he'd be Robert Gallery #2 and go really high but I heard Top 10. Question. If you have a really good team like The Patriots? When they draft someone are they more drafting for the future down the road as opposed to right now like some of the lower teams are doing? B/c teams like The Pats may just have everyone they need right now. Still though I think The Eagles need to draft a good wideout. I mean it wouldn't be smart to do everything in your power to try and get Mike Williams. But get someone good to compliment TO and Westbrook. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 I'm not so sure that the Dolphins are going to draft RB. With all the rumors of Edge or Alexander possibly going to Miami I think it's best to wait on that. If they don't end up getting one of those two (also, Travis Henry) I would love for them to draft Benson. Dama, if I were in charge of the Pats, I would trade some picks for next year, the year after, etc... They are pretty much set atm, a big play WR would be nice, but totally unnecessary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nl5xsk1 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 The Pats have a few holes that need to be filled ... - their age at LB has to be a concern - they could use a taller, more physical wide-out - their secondary is made up of 'getting old' (Harrison, Poole), 'still too young (Samuel, Wilson, Gay, Moreland), and 'most likely leaving' (Law), so I wouldn't mind seeing them pick up another DB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smh810 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 I guess I'm one of the few who is not sold on Braylon Edwards, sure he'll probably go high in the draft but Michigan wide recievers for the most part do not have a good history in the NFL and I really dont see Edwards being any different. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the pinjockey 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 Kiper's Top 25 from ESPN.com 1. Cedric Benson Sr. RB Texas 2. Ronnie Brown Sr. RB Auburn 3. Carnell Williams Sr. RB Auburn 4. Mike Williams Jr. WR USC 5. Dan Cody Sr. DT Oklahoma 6. Erasmus James Sr. DE Wisconsin 7. Derrick Johnson Sr. LB Texas 8. Travis Johnson Sr. DT Fla. St. 9. Braylon Edwards Sr. WR Michigan 10. Matt Roth Sr. DE Iowa 11. Alex Barron Sr. OT Fla. St. 12. Shaun Cody Sr. DL USC 13. Jammal Brown Sr. OT Oklahoma 14. Marcus Spears Sr. DE LSU 15. David Pollack Sr. DE Georgia 16. Antrel Rolle Sr. CB Miami 17. Charlie Frye Sr. QB Akron 18. Bryant McFadden Sr. CB Fla. St. 19. Adam Terry Sr. OT Syracuse 20. Mark Clayton Sr. WR Oklahoma 21. Carlos Rogers Sr. DB Auburn 22. Alex Smith Sr. TE Stanford 23. Mark Bradley Sr. WR Oklahoma 24. Marcus Johnson Sr. OG Ole Miss 25. Corey Webster Sr. DB LSU Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 Is that the order he thinks they are going to go in? Cedric Benson #1 and Ronnie Brown #2? I didn't even think Benson would go Top 10 b/c he's such an underrated performer sometimes(notice i didn't say all the time). Who is going to be #1 this year? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the pinjockey 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 No, it is just the order of who is the best prospect, not a mock draft. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the pinjockey 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 At this point, I would not even guess who will be number one, because I do not think that the pick stays with SF. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 The #1 pick will likely be a RB but I wouldn't be surprised to see a team draft Matt Leinart or Mike Williams. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 I'd think twice drafting a RB, with the first pick. You can probably trade down, or even wait until the 2nd round and find a good RB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teke184 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 I agree with Vern... what position comes first depends on whether San Fran keeps the pick or trades it. If San Fran picks, it could be any position EXCEPT a running back. The Niners already have Barlow and another running back, so that's one of the few positions they don't need to fill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Shadow Behind You Report post Posted January 5, 2005 Bengals need to draft Cody or Roth. I believe Williams will be impressive in the combines and Oakland will pick him up. alot of RB's out there this year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Failed Mascot Report post Posted January 5, 2005 If San Fran picks, it could be any position EXCEPT a running back. The Niners already have Barlow and another running back, so that's one of the few positions they don't need to fill. I could see them taking Mike Williams since they seem to like Tim Rattay at QB. they could even trade down to do it. Cleveland needs to take a QB and cut Garcia loose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 I'm sorry but Tim Rattay is not a starting QB in the NFL. Trade down, get more picks and draft Charlie Frye from Akron. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Failed Mascot Report post Posted January 5, 2005 I'd draft a QB too if I was San Fran...however you know their front office now is filled with morons. Morons that like Tim Rattay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gert T 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 1 San Francisco 2-14 .488 2 Miami 4-12 .555 3 Cleveland 4-12 .590 4 Chicago 5-11 .465 5 Tampa Bay 5-11 .477 6 Tennessee 5-11 .508 7 Oakland 5-11 .570 8 Arizona 6-10 .461 9 Washington 6-10 .477 10 Detroit 6-10 .496 11 Dallas 6-10 .516 12 San Diego (f/NYG) 6-10 .516 13 Houston 7-9 .504 14 Carolina 7-9 .508 15 Kansas City 7-9 .555 16 New Orleans 8-8 .465 17 Cincinnati 8-8 .543 18 Dallas (f/BUF) 9-7 .512 19 Jacksonville 9-7 .527 20 Baltimore 9-7 .551 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 I was thinking more in terms of if SF trades their pick away. I can see someone trading up to grab Benson or Arrington or something stupid like that. Maybe Chicago (because.... THOMAS JONES IS NOT THE ANSWER), however I hope not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest El Satanico Report post Posted January 5, 2005 My team (Cleveland) must draft offensive linemen, and they must draft them early not late round reaches/experiments. From what I've heard and read this is a strong draft for offensive linemen. They should draft LT in round 1 and a G in round 2. They could also use a game changing play maker on the defense, but offensive line is more important at this point. Taking a QB in the first 3 rounds would be a mistake for them. We've done the draft QB high and throw him into the fire with no protection thing, so now is the time to get the protection before getting the QB. Besides, Garcia would be fine for another year if we get a coaching staff that will let him play his game. The old coaching staff tried to turn him into a pocket passer, which made no sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
converge241 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 you speak the truth about the browns...shore up that O line cause they have serviceable runners and just need to protect the qb they have i think they may end up cutting garcia though and trying to go with holcomb and mccown..i dont think that they should but heard that rumor Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Flyboy Report post Posted January 5, 2005 I was thinking more in terms of if SF trades their pick away. I can see someone trading up to grab Benson or Arrington or something stupid like that. Maybe Chicago (because.... THOMAS JONES IS NOT THE ANSWER), however I hope not. Chicago will probably be in a position to draft Braylon Edwards or Mike Williams. They ain't trading up for shit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 I was thinking more in terms of if SF trades their pick away. I can see someone trading up to grab Benson or Arrington or something stupid like that. Maybe Chicago (because.... THOMAS JONES IS NOT THE ANSWER), however I hope not. Chicago will probably be in a position to draft Braylon Edwards or Mike Williams. They ain't trading up for shit. I hope Mike Williams. We had a highly regarded WR come out of Michigan a few years ago by the name of David Terrell... so that soured me on Michigan receivers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 I was thinking more in terms of if SF trades their pick away. I can see someone trading up to grab Benson or Arrington or something stupid like that. Maybe Chicago (because.... THOMAS JONES IS NOT THE ANSWER), however I hope not. Chicago will probably be in a position to draft Braylon Edwards or Mike Williams. They ain't trading up for shit. I hope Mike Williams. We had a highly regarded WR come out of Michigan a few years ago by the name of David Terrell... so that soured me on Michigan receivers. On that note allow me to reiterate what I have said many times about UofM players in general. They rarely have a huge amount of success in the NFL. The reason for that is simple: They usually have such a great team that the individual players end up looking better than they really are. Running backs run better behind thier above average O-lines, QBs throw better to above average WRs, etc... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheDevilAndGodAreRagingInsideMe 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 Big Blue needs offensive line (Although rumor has them taking a stab at Walter Jones or Orlando Pace this offseason), a speed reciever, probably a reliable safety, and whatever other sleeper than can get their hands on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HarleyQuinn 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 Some more underclassmen entering the draft. RB Ryan Moats of Louisiana Tech RB Eric Shelton of Louisville ILB Odell Thurman of Georgia LB/DL Shawne Merriman of Maryland FS Thomas Davis of Georgia Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Failed Mascot Report post Posted January 5, 2005 On that note allow me to reiterate what I have said many times about UofM players in general. They rarely have a huge amount of success in the NFL. I'm glad those rare individuals who do are on the Pats(Tom Brady and Ty Law). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2005 On that note allow me to reiterate what I have said many times about UofM players in general. They rarely have a huge amount of success in the NFL. I'm glad those rare individuals who do are on the Pats(Tom Brady and Ty Law). But again, great team, not necessarily great individuals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Failed Mascot Report post Posted January 5, 2005 Ty Law is a shut down corner and has over 60 career picks I believe. Brady just wins, and has won games in the final moments of games several times. These are great players. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
