Why not a Sunday Night Heat Title?

[Guest TysonTomko420]

give the Show a little Direction. you got enough for another Title Division. it can be headlined by Tyson Tomko, Val Venis, Kerwin White, Chris Masters, Danny Basham, Rob Conway, and Tajiri.

 

Thats a solid Division in my opinion. And i think a few of those guys should be on Raw but there not and need to have some direction. All of those guys are doing nothing at all except masters.

 

Im not saying go balls with storylines out but have title defenses on heat and stuff would be cool. And u can Help elavate some of these wrestlers and give them something to do. its better then jobber squash matches on heat. and the whole show doesnt have to be dominated by this they can still have other Raw Wrestlers wrestle on heat.

 

They can call it the Euro title and doesnt need to be defended at PPVs even. Just give the heat guys something to do

 

Good idea or no?

[bob_barron 0]

The loser title? No thanks.

[Dangerous A 0]

Isnt that what the IC and US titles should be for?

[Boon 0]

Sunday Night Heat has a title.

 

They're called the Tag-Team Titles.

[Exslade ZX 0]

give the Show a little Direction.  you got enough for another Title Division.  it can be headlined by Tyson Tomko, Val Venis, Kerwin White, Chris Masters, Danny Basham, Rob Conway, and Tajiri.

 

Thats a solid Division in my opinion.  And i think a few of those guys should be on Raw but there not and need to have some direction.  All of those guys are doing nothing at all except masters. 

 

Im not saying go balls with storylines out but have title defenses on heat and stuff would be cool.  And u can Help elavate some of these wrestlers and give them something to do.  its better then jobber squash matches on heat.  and the whole show doesnt have to be dominated by this they can still have other Raw Wrestlers wrestle on heat. 

 

They can call it the Euro title and doesnt need to be defended at PPVs even.  Just give the heat guys something to do

 

Good idea or no?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Because in kayfabe there is no such thing as "Heat guys". I mean, who wants the secondary show title?

 

The only way they could do that is if they broke up Heat into it's own seperate division/brand or something...and that's not a good thing. The Ic title, and US title should occasionally be defended on those shows maybe..but it doesn't need it's own title.

 

Possibly when they do go down to one show..it might not sound like as bad of an idea..but atm, just doesn't sound good to me.

[Guest TysonTomko420]

give the Show a little Direction.  you got enough for another Title Division.  it can be headlined by Tyson Tomko, Val Venis, Kerwin White, Chris Masters, Danny Basham, Rob Conway, and Tajiri.

 

Thats a solid Division in my opinion.  And i think a few of those guys should be on Raw but there not and need to have some direction.  All of those guys are doing nothing at all except masters. 

 

Im not saying go balls with storylines out but have title defenses on heat and stuff would be cool.  And u can Help elavate some of these wrestlers and give them something to do.  its better then jobber squash matches on heat.  and the whole show doesnt have to be dominated by this they can still have other Raw Wrestlers wrestle on heat. 

 

They can call it the Euro title and doesnt need to be defended at PPVs even.  Just give the heat guys something to do

 

Good idea or no?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Because in kayfabe there is no such thing as "Heat guys". I mean, who wants the secondary show title?

 

The only way they could do that is if they broke up Heat into it's own seperate division/brand or something...and that's not a good thing. The Ic title, and US title should occasionally be defended on those shows maybe..but it doesn't need it's own title.

 

Possibly when they do go down to one show..it might not sound like as bad of an idea..but atm, just doesn't sound good to me.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

the hardcore title and Euro title used to be mostly Heat though which is what im getting at. theres just nothing for those guys to do and a fued on raw for a guy like val venis wouldnt work cause he has no credibility so hes basically stuck

[benoit4hor 0]

Tyson Tomko will never hold a title, get over it.

[SuperJerk 0]

Basically, you're asking the WWE to give you a reason to watch their programming.

 

I'd rather they did this with storylines instead of new titles. There are too many titles people don't care about as it is.

 

Of course, I know its very unlikely they'd give Heat is own storylines, because that'd be too much work for them.

[Guest TysonTomko420]

Basically, you're asking the WWE to give you a reason to watch their programming.

 

I'd rather they did this with storylines instead of new titles.  There are too many titles people don't care about as it is.

 

Of course, I know its very unlikely they'd give Heat is own storylines, because that'd be too much work for them.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

yea i know. a title would be better for the writers at least. i mean just book the champ to win every week and give an interview when not wrestling

[Guest Ransome]

Basically, you're asking the WWE to give you a reason to watch their programming.

 

I'd rather they did this with storylines instead of new titles.  There are too many titles people don't care about as it is.

 

Of course, I know its very unlikely they'd give Heat is own storylines, because that'd be too much work for them.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Exactly. There's no reason to throw another title into the mix that would only highlight the inferiority of the wrestlers competing for it. Trimming down the absurd number of titles to a manageable number was one of WWE's few progressive decisions in the dark days of 2002, so I see no need to create more titles and recreate the same problems as before.