Guest Black Widow Report post Posted August 1, 2005 I bow to the superior writing skills of the SWF. I can barely reach 3000 words when I write my stuff. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd say writing a good match in less than 3000 words is better than going on forever writing 10000+ word matches. Who the hell in their right mind is going to read neverending matches besides the writer and his opponent? These e-feds are... unique. They make Jay Bower articles look tiny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JJ Johnson 0 Report post Posted August 1, 2005 I can't fault your efficiency. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Secret Agent 0 Report post Posted August 1, 2005 9,958 is my final count. Usually when i go that long I loose so we'll see while I win when i slap together recycled bits of previous matches and make the PPv match less than 6k. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ace309 0 Report post Posted August 1, 2005 I bow to the superior writing skills of the SWF. I can barely reach 3000 words when I write my stuff. I'd say writing a good match in less than 3000 words is better than going on forever writing 10000+ word matches. Who the hell in their right mind is going to read neverending matches besides the writer and his opponent? These e-feds are... unique. They make Jay Bower articles look tiny. Depends how you want to do it. We're fairly intense with the psychology, and sometimes the once-every-six-weeks PPV match takes a significant word count to tell a story. It's not that length makes a better match, by any stretch - if a match drags, it drags. If, however, when they cut loose, the writers want to go that big, then I'm not going to stop them from writing an epic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites