Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Six or seven just feels like a bit much. I remember when the Sports forum had like, five and it was enough to prompt a major trimming of such things. It isn't hard to scroll past, but it looks silly when, say, you've got the new and the old threads for the Danger Zone pinned.

Guest Coffey
Posted
...it's not like we're keeping quality discussion from the first page.

That's a good point.

 

Of course, I don't think we need the "2005 Win/Loss Records," "Must See Matches," "Helpful WWE Links & Resources," or "WWE Forum Guidelines." Maybe the newest "Danger Zone" thread.

Posted

The reason the second dangerzone thread was left, was because the show was still a few days fresh and didn't want it to go unoticed since the next show had already come out.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...