USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted February 24, 2006 The Indians COULD make the playoffs and they could win it all if things fell in place like it did for the White Sox last postseason. The Yankees should make the playoffs though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingPK 0 Report post Posted February 24, 2006 Toronto will probably do enough damage to both Boston and New York to make themselves a factor in the race, but I don't see them having enough offense to break through. Don't forget about Tampa. They've gotten more and more frisky as their young players have improved, so they should also take some wins away from the rest of the division (I think they were close in the season series with both Boston and New York last year). 90 wins will probably be enough to win the division and I don't see any Eastern team cracking 95+ wins this year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bored 0 Report post Posted February 24, 2006 I think odds are either the Yankees or Red Sox will miss the playoffs this year. Which one, I'm not sure at the moment. The A.L. is stacked this year and I have a feeling the Wild Card will come out of the West or Central. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted February 24, 2006 I think odds are either the Yankees or Red Sox will miss the playoffs this year. Which one, I'm not sure at the moment. The A.L. is stacked this year and I have a feeling the Wild Card will come out of the West or Central. Red Sox are the more likely. I legitimately only see them as the third best team in the division at this point. There are a lot of question marks with that team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheech Tremendous 0 Report post Posted February 24, 2006 I think odds are either the Yankees or Red Sox will miss the playoffs this year. Which one, I'm not sure at the moment. The A.L. is stacked this year and I have a feeling the Wild Card will come out of the West or Central. Red Sox are the more likely. I legitimately only see them as the third best team in the division at this point. There are a lot of question marks with that team. The Red Sox have question marks, but so does every other team in the division. They've improved the starting pitching, bullpen and infield defense this offseason from a team that won 95 games last year. I'm not sure how you can view them as the third best team in the division. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted February 24, 2006 The Red Sox have question marks, but so does every other team in the division. They've improved the starting pitching, bullpen and infield defense this offseason from a team that won 95 games last year. I'm not sure how you can view them as the third best team in the division. The Yankees have the best lineup in the division, and adding Damon only improves it. Their bullpen has also been improved, although Farnsworth is a bit of a risk. Their biggest concerns are on the pitching staff with Johnson & Mussina getting up in age, Mussina being an injury-risk and a bunch of one-year wonders (many of whom are also injury-prone) after that. But Boston's rotation isn't much better, with Schilling & Beckett being injury concerns, Clement being pretty reliable, and a weak end of the rotation. Damon's loss hurts too. Toronto has the best pitching and defense in the division, and an offense that isn't as good as either the Yankees or Boston but is much improved over the offensively challenged Jays that still managed to win 80 games a year ago. Assuming Halladay stays healthy, and last year's freak injury shouldn't be a lingering problem, they look better than Boston does. Boston finished second last year and got worse during the off-season, while Toronto potentially improved more than any team in the majors. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheech Tremendous 0 Report post Posted February 25, 2006 While I agree with most of what you have stated, I don't see how the Sox got worse this offseason. They made a lot of changes, which can lead to uncertainty, but other than a potential dip in runs scored the rest of the team is much better. Heading into spring training, they have 7 potential starters (Schilling, Beckett, Wells, Clement, Wakefield, Arroyo, Papelbon), which will not only provide depth, but allow them to deal for a fourth outfielder or whatever else they feel they might need. Offensively, Youkilis is an upgrade at first, Loretta is at second, SS and CF are a wash. 3B is the only position they downgraded at offensively, but at the expense of improving the infield defense (plus Lowell could bounce back, but I doubt it). They had the worst bullpen in baseball last year but they strengthened it with the acquisitions of Riske and Tavarez, and provided that Foulke can give them something this year, that's a vast overall improvement for the late innings. So once again, show me how this team got worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mike546 0 Report post Posted February 25, 2006 CF is not a wash, Crisp is not going to get on base as much as Damon did. How is Alex Gonzalez better than Renteria? Unless your saying the improvements at 1st and 2nd wash out SS and CF, which I don't think is true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vampiro69 0 Report post Posted February 25, 2006 I think the White Sox take a step backwards this year because I believe that the Starting pitchers overachived last year. Garland, Contreras won't do as well this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted February 25, 2006 CF is not a wash, Crisp is not going to get on base as much as Damon did. How is Alex Gonzalez better than Renteria? Unless your saying the improvements at 1st and 2nd wash out SS and CF, which I don't think is true. I agree. Crisp is a fine player, but the Damon loss is a big one and Boston took major hits at SS & 3B. I have no faith in Foulke either, so the bullpen probably still struggles. Boston could finish above Toronto depending on what happens with regards to injuries and underperformance and so forth, but I fail to see how Boston didn't get worse, at least on paper. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted February 25, 2006 I think the White Sox take a step backwards this year because I believe that the Starting pitchers overachived last year. Garland, Contreras won't do as well this season. Not that I have a lot of respect for him, but Javier Vasquez will be fine. The Sox's starting rotation would consist of Buehrle, Vasquez, Garcia, Garland and Contreras. You also have Brandon McCarthy about to break in the rotation as well, maybe. So that's a good rotation and certainly better than most of the other Central teams'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheech Tremendous 0 Report post Posted February 25, 2006 CF is not a wash, Crisp is not going to get on base as much as Damon did. How is Alex Gonzalez better than Renteria? Unless your saying the improvements at 1st and 2nd wash out SS and CF, which I don't think is true. Actual 2005 numbers: Coco Crisp 300/345/465 Johnny Damon 316/366/439 Edgar Renteria 276/335/385 Alex Gonzalez 264/319/368 The players are already close in their numbers. Factor the move of Crisp and A-Gon from two of the best pitching parks in the majors to a decent hitter's park in Fenway and the numbers are essentially a wash. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mole 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 How are people's predictions going? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawk 34 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 How are people's predictions going? I was 1/2 right about someone flirting with .400 playing on a non-contender (I say Minnesota is still alive). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mole 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 Why is everyone blowing the Yankees? They don't have the pitching to go that deep into the playoffs. AL East Winner: New York Yankees AL Central Winner: Chicago White Sox AL West Winner: Los Angeles Angels AL Wild Card Winner: Clevland Indians NL East Winner: New York Mets NL Central Winner: St. Louis Cardinals NL West Winner: Los Angeles Dodgers NL Wild Card Winner: Atlanta Braves AL: ChiSox over Indians Angels over Yankees ChiSox over Angels NL: Cardinals over Braves Mets over Dodgers Cardinals over Mets WS: ChiSox over Cardinals Yeah, pretty standard picks, but I see it happening all over again. I hope I am wrong and the BoSox make the playoffs, but I don't see that happening. Well, I am doing well in the National League, minus the WC. And none of the AL teams are right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarvinisaLunatic 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 The only way anyone had the Tigers in the AL Central is through a Back to the Future 2 Scenario.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Felonies! Report post Posted July 3, 2006 So you got 2 out of 8. Strong work, Mole Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mole 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 Well atleast the Dodgers are close. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheDevilAndGodAreRagingInsideMe 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 Nobody can predict injuries, obviously, but the pitching sucking balls I sure predicted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruiser Chong 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 Like I said earlier in the thread, these are always fun to look back at, considering how off some predictions are. Bless some people who had the Cubs taking the WC. From the first half, I'd have to say the Indians, Brewers and Cubs are the most disappointing teams, while the Tigers, Marlins, and Reds have been the most surprising. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted July 3, 2006 CanadianChris has the best picks, I believe. American League East: New York Central: Chicago West: Oakland Wild card: Toronto Division series: Oakland over New York, Chicago over Toronto ALCS: Chicago over Oakland National League East: New York (fuck it, the Braves are finally done) Central: St. Louis West: San Diego Wild card: Los Angeles Division series: St. Louis over Los Angeles, New York over San Diego NLCS: St. Louis over New York World Series: St. Louis over Chicago Pretty good. Mine are ok, but I screwed up the AL West by picking the Angels, but putting the A's in the playoffs. Looking down further on the first page, I said that I didn't get the love for Vlad and the lineup at all, so I guess that means I was thinking Oakland. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheDevilAndGodAreRagingInsideMe 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 I don't think Milwaukee is that disappointing, they're playing .500ish which is what I figured they would do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vivalaultra 0 Report post Posted July 3, 2006 Yeah, I don't think the Brewers are a disappointment. They're hovering around .500, and that's with Ohka and Sheets out. I'm more concerned about the Brewers down the stretch than I am about the Reds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites