luke-o Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 With the rumour circulating that Orten may be done done with WWE for good, Would u have him in our six sided ring? Personally, altough he would brong Name value, if people like Bentley and Hoyt arent getting a push because of their bad attitudes, why should Orten? And if they bring him in and don't push him, whats the point?
claydude14 Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 If there was more TV time to go around, he'd be a worthwhile addition based on his name, but his attitude won't get him far.
ChrisMWaters Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 I'd have him in for a one shot where he gets squashed by Samoa Joe and that's about it.
Mole Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 It would help TNA look more 'mainstream.' But that all he is good for.
Mystery Eskimo Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 No. He'd probably behave even worse in TNA.
dubq Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 I'd have him in for a one shot where he gets squashed by Samoa Joe and that's about it. THAT I could deal with. Maybe even have Joe stiff the shit out of him just for shits and giggles.
daileyxplanet Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 I'd settle for an Unprettier from the World Champion, however.
haws bah gawd Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 I'd have him in for a one shot where he gets squashed by Samoa Joe and that's about it. THAT I could deal with. Maybe even have Joe stiff the shit out of him just for shits and giggles. IMO, Joe is one of the most overrated wrestlers in the history of the internet, but I would LOVE to see this.
Guest Coffey Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 I'd bring in Orton, have him RKO Jarrett, Samoa Joe, Christian & Sting, win the World Title and then job him out to Abyss.
Magus Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 Yeah, he could come into TNA, take more time away from the talented guys who are already being held down, and he can work a lame program heavily involving Jeff Jarrett that won't draw a dime. Yeah...
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 Of course Randy Orton has value to TNA, much more value than being squash food for Joe. The thing is, Christian had more overness when he left WWE for TNA, and we see that they are doing almost nothing with him. Why would it be different for Randy?
benoit4hor Posted April 14, 2006 Report Posted April 14, 2006 Only if he came in and gave Bullet Bob Armstrong an RKO, setting up a B.G. James vs Randy Orton feud the culminates with Bullet Bob vs Cowboy Bob in an arm wrestling match inside a cage.
BruiserKC Posted April 15, 2006 Report Posted April 15, 2006 I'd bring Brock Lesnar in before I would Orton. Brock's more established, and he would give TNA more mainstream credibility. Orton's not quite there yet...and TNA doesn't need that headache.
thecitythesky Posted April 15, 2006 Report Posted April 15, 2006 I'd bring Brock Lesnar in before I would Orton. Brock's more established, and he would give TNA more mainstream credibility. Orton's not quite there yet...and TNA doesn't need that headache. * You are aware that they cannot possibly bring Lesnar in for a nearly excessive amount of time, right.?
Dark Age Posted April 15, 2006 Report Posted April 15, 2006 There would be nothing wrong with Orton in TNA. He wouldn't be the greatest thing ever or anything, but sure, he would help. I dunno who he would be a good match with though.
luke-o Posted April 15, 2006 Author Report Posted April 15, 2006 As i said he would be a good asset to the company based on name. But ive never been impressed with his in ring skill. He should just job to joe then be on his way. ORTON. just shows how little i care for the man.
Guest Princess Leena Posted April 15, 2006 Report Posted April 15, 2006 That's nice. We can delete this thread then! Thank you.
BruiserKC Posted April 17, 2006 Report Posted April 17, 2006 I'd bring Brock Lesnar in before I would Orton. Brock's more established, and he would give TNA more mainstream credibility. Orton's not quite there yet...and TNA doesn't need that headache. * You are aware that they cannot possibly bring Lesnar in for a nearly excessive amount of time, right.? Once the judge rules against the WWE in the trial regarding the no-compete clause (and everything points to that happening) Brock would be free to go anywhere. It would be a question of if they can afford him.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now