snuffbox Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 He must be the backup guy when TO escapes the imagination, or the cameras, for a second.
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Did Hasselbeck get knocked out of the game? Why is Cynical Wallace playing?
CanadianChris Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Did Hasselbeck get knocked out of the game? Why is Cynical Wallace playing? Sprained knee three series ago.
Guest Vitamin X Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Manning is right behind Favre in consecutive starts, correct? Well, not right behind, because Favre has a huge lead, but Peyton is in 2nd? I know that he's 2nd for active streaks but I'm not sure if he passed the all-time 2nd place but he will, if he hasn't already. This is for QB's only, as I believe other position players have gone longer then Manning and I believe Favre. The record of most consecutive games played by a non-kicker/punter (really, they shouldn't count, when the fuck do they ever get contact outside of the occasional roughing the kicker penalty?) is defensive lineman Jim "Wrong Way" Marshall, who was part of the Purple People Eaters for the 70's Vikings. He played in 282 consecutive games over 19 seasons (this was when NFL seasons were shorter, though). Today's game marked Favre's 227th consecutive start, only two behind legendary Buffalo Bills tackle Bruce Matthews, 13 behind 70's Viking offensive lineman Mick Tinglehoff, and 43 behind Jim Marshall. To match Marshall, Favre would have to play through all of this year and the next two seasons consecutively, not including playoffs (but why bother with this bunch and the competition in the NFC..?)
Slayer Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 I think you should leave the Bronx. Even though this is Italy? If you leave the Bronx, I'll give you Fudgicles I have to rely on the radio for my Vikings fix, as fulfilling AwShucks weekly TV time is apparently more important here.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Manning is right behind Favre in consecutive starts, correct? Well, not right behind, because Favre has a huge lead, but Peyton is in 2nd? I know that he's 2nd for active streaks but I'm not sure if he passed the all-time 2nd place but he will, if he hasn't already. This is for QB's only, as I believe other position players have gone longer then Manning and I believe Favre. The record of most consecutive games played by a non-kicker/punter (really, they shouldn't count, when the fuck do they ever get contact outside of the occasional roughing the kicker penalty?) is defensive lineman Jim "Wrong Way" Marshall, who was part of the Purple People Eaters for the 70's Vikings. He played in 282 consecutive games over 19 seasons (this was when NFL seasons were shorter, though). Today's game marked Favre's 227th consecutive start, only two behind legendary Buffalo Bills tackle Bruce Matthews, 13 behind 70's Viking offensive lineman Mick Tinglehoff, and 43 behind Jim Marshall. To match Marshall, Favre would have to play through all of this year and the next two seasons consecutively, not including playoffs (but why bother with this bunch and the competition in the NFC..?) You mean Houston Oilers/Tennessee Oilers/Tennessee Titans.
Guest Vitamin X Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 They really like to talk about Steve Hutchinson a lot. Even when he's not playing his former team. "Good thing they got Steve Hutchinson!" "The key to the Vikings making the playoffs is Steve Hutchinson!" "The Seahawks would've beaten the Bears if they still had Steve Hutchinson." Yeah, but it's for two reasons. One, the Vikings don't have any real notable "star" players on their team anymore since the departure of Culpepper and Moss. And two, he's the best young guard out in free agency. Green Bay would've been so lucky as to have him, he would have made a huge difference in Green Bay, and possibly the draft as well since they would've locked up a starting guard spot.
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 These Jon Lovitz Subway ads make me uncomfortable. He's always yelling and it's really loud and abrasive, and discourages me from eating. I wish this ad campaign would end.
Hawk 34 Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 These Jon Lovitz Subway ads make me uncomfortable. He's always yelling and it's really loud and abrasive, and discourages me from eating. I wish this ad campaign would end. Agreed. They couldn't get Daniel Stern or Dana Carvey instead?
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 These Jon Lovitz Subway ads make me uncomfortable. He's always yelling and it's really loud and abrasive, and discourages me from eating. I wish this ad campaign would end. Agreed. They couldn't get Daniel Stern or Dana Carvey instead? EATTHESANDWIIIICH! No, Jon! And let me tell you, Reggie Bush, Subway does not prevent you from being hungry.
Guest Vitamin X Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Manning is right behind Favre in consecutive starts, correct? Well, not right behind, because Favre has a huge lead, but Peyton is in 2nd? I know that he's 2nd for active streaks but I'm not sure if he passed the all-time 2nd place but he will, if he hasn't already. This is for QB's only, as I believe other position players have gone longer then Manning and I believe Favre. The record of most consecutive games played by a non-kicker/punter (really, they shouldn't count, when the fuck do they ever get contact outside of the occasional roughing the kicker penalty?) is defensive lineman Jim "Wrong Way" Marshall, who was part of the Purple People Eaters for the 70's Vikings. He played in 282 consecutive games over 19 seasons (this was when NFL seasons were shorter, though). Today's game marked Favre's 227th consecutive start, only two behind legendary Buffalo Bills tackle Bruce Matthews, 13 behind 70's Viking offensive lineman Mick Tinglehoff, and 43 behind Jim Marshall. To match Marshall, Favre would have to play through all of this year and the next two seasons consecutively, not including playoffs (but why bother with this bunch and the competition in the NFC..?) You mean Houston Oilers/Tennessee Oilers/Tennessee Titans. Oops yeah, I thought of Bruce Smith for some reason there.
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 The guy calling this game sounds kind of like Jonathan Coachman.
CanadianChris Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Why the hell is Denver throwing the ball? If they're just going to dink and dunk their way up the field to kill time, why would you keep stopping the clock by throwing incomplete?
Hawk 34 Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 How is it that Plummer manages to walk into bad teams and plays decently enough (2 INTS for him doesn't seem like a bad game, to me) to keep his job for at least another week? Why don't they just go ahead and cut him, so they can start the Cutler era and Plummer can go to Dallas like we all know he will this off-season anyways.
Art Sandusky Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 So much for that. A long-ass drive gets nothing for Washington. Let the LSU boy run the clock out now. Man, I'm pissed that there's no night game this week.
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 What a strange touchdown. Well, the Seahawks are fading.
Slayer Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Seattle fumbles into the endzone and Minnesota grabs it for a TD
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 The Raiders are going to beat the Cardinals. The Raiders are who we thought they were.
Slayer Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Dammit, that means another year to wait and see if someone can pull the 0-16
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 I know, but you don't want it to be the Raiders. It ruins their legacy. Let it be some shitty club like the Lions or something.
CanadianGuitarist Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 The Raiders are going to beat the Cardinals. The Raiders are who we thought they were. This isn't the first time they've taken a lead to the fourth this year. But my hopes are officially up.
Slayer Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Even though they're a division rival, I have a soft spot for the Lions and wouldn't want to see that happen to them. Let it happen to the Cardinals, it's beyond fitting.
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Did Childress just grab his crotch on camera? Yeah you're right, let it be the Cardinals. I wish their stadium got the "jobing.com" name and not the Coyotes.
CanadianChris Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 I know, but you don't want it to be the Raiders. It ruins their legacy. Let it be some shitty club like the Lions or something. As a Broncos fan, I certainly did.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 How is it that Plummer manages to walk into bad teams and plays decently enough (2 INTS for him doesn't seem like a bad game, to me) to keep his job for at least another week? Why don't they just go ahead and cut him, so they can start the Cutler era and Plummer can go to Dallas like we all know he will this off-season anyways. Don't be stupid. There's already a QB controversy in Dallas with Romo. Adding Plummer to the mix makes ZERO sense.
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 HAY LOOK! Broncos win 17-7. Compelling stuff.
CanadianChris Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 HAY LOOK! Broncos win 17-7. Compelling stuff. Whatever, they're a game up in the AFC West now. They can win every game 10-6 between now and Miami if that's what it takes.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Chris, win or not, you have got to be concerned about the lack of productivity on offense, aren't you?
CanadianChris Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Chris, win or not, you have got to be concerned about the lack of productivity on offense, aren't you? Yes, I am, especially with potentially high-powered offences coming up in Indy, Cincy and San Diego (twice). I think it's too much to ask for the defence to hold those teams to 10 points or less. Hopefully, Denver is just doing enough to win right now, given they're playing really bad teams, and they can throw a few big plays in the next few weeks. That's a pretty dangerous game to play. Or, maybe the defence CAN hold anyone they want under 10 points, who knows. But yes, I'm a bit worried right now.
Guest Felonies! Posted October 22, 2006 Report Posted October 22, 2006 Anybody else enjoying the week-to-week downfall of Nick Saban?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now