SuperJerk Posted February 13, 2007 Report Posted February 13, 2007 I never thought I'd say this, but John Boehner makes me miss Newt Gingrich.
snuffbox Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Posted February 14, 2007 Why do so many Republicans keep saying 'Islamist Jihadist'? Is 'Islamist' even a word?
SuperJerk Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Why do so many Republicans keep saying 'Islamist Jihadist'? Is 'Islamist' even a word? Slightly less stupid expression than the ever-moronic "Islamo-fascist" they were test marketing last year. I swear, every year they come up with a new name to call our enemies. Its like this war is being fought by a P.R. firm or something.
Big Ol' Smitty Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Islamist is a real word. It refers to someone who wants a government based on Islam.
2GOLD Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 The real question is Jihadist a word? I know Jihad is, but is a Jihadist someone who wants to carry out a jihad no matter what?
SuperJerk Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Both are words, but I just don't like the way one noun ("Islamist") is being used to modify another noun ("Jihadist"). Adjectives are our friends.
Guest Oedipus Rex Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 But lots of nouns function as adjectives, like tin can, or Republican senator. It's just the cadence and common suffix of "Islamist jihadist" that makes it clunky.
Guest Dope Priest Prophecy Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 How about "Islamic"?
Guest Oedipus Rex Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 But then you lose Islamist, which is the part that denotes belief in a Muslim theocracy. All jihadists would be Islamic by definition, since as far as I know, jihad pertains exclusively to Islam, similar to the redundancy in "Christian crusader." Once in 8th grade social studies, this girl was getting pissy and defensive and went "well crucify me to a cross! Jeeeesus!" to which I pointed out that being crucified by definition necessitates a cross, and furthermore, I don't think Jesus would crucify you like you just asked him to. I wasn't explicitly banned from it, but seven years later, I'm playing it safe and not going to her mom's McDonald's.
SuperJerk Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 I'm not sure if that's what "Islamist" actually means.
Dobbs 3K Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 I believe "Islamic Jihadist" would be more correct than "Islamist Jihadist".
EricMM Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Come on you guys. Cease. Lets talk about The New Congress.
Big Ol' Smitty Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Main Entry: Is·lam·ism Pronunciation: is-'lä-"mi-z&m, iz-, -'la-; 'iz-l&- Function: noun a popular reform movement advocating the reordering of government and society in accordance with laws prescribed by Islam - Is·lam·ist /-mist/ noun
SuperJerk Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Nobody wants to tackle the term "Islamo"? Because, seriously, that sounds like the name of one of Skeletor's henchmen.
Dobbs 3K Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Nobody wants to tackle the term "Islamo"? Because, seriously, that sounds like the name of one of Skeletor's henchmen. Well, "Islamofacsism" is a popular term with at least one conservative radio host.
Big Ol' Smitty Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 I don't get the "Islamofascism" term because fascism usually connotes an emphasis on the STATE over everything. The crazy folk coming out of Southwest Asia seem to be more theocratic than fascistic. I even heard someone use the term Islamonazism which makes even less sense.
SuperJerk Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Yeah, see my post from earlier if you want to know what I think about him doing that.
Dobbs 3K Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 I don't get the "Islamofascism" term because fascism usually connotes an emphasis on the STATE over everything. The crazy folk coming out of Southwest Asia seem to be more theocratic than fascistic. I even heard someone use the term Islamonaziism which makes even less sense. I could see that maybe being used in a historical context. During World War II, a lot of Muslims worked with the Nazis.
Big Ol' Smitty Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 I'm not going to argue that Islamic Fundamentalism & Nazism don't share some core values, like authoritarianism, militarism, & anti-liberalism (not to mention anti-Semitism), but the parallel doesn't go much further than that.
SuperJerk Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 I'm not going to argue that Islamic Fundamentalism & Nazism don't share some core values, like authoritarianism, militarism, & anti-liberalism (not to mention anti-Semitism), but the parallel doesn't go much further than that. The most obvious major difference was that fascism was a purely secular movement. Everything was done for the glorification of the state. Islamic extremism goes in the complete opposite direction, because the state is only seen as a tool to impose their religious views.
snuffbox Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Posted February 14, 2007 Anyone else actually watching the debate?
Big Ol' Smitty Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 I just flipped it on. Snow days rule~!
Big Ol' Smitty Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Didn't realize so many R Congressmen are against the surge.
snuffbox Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Posted February 14, 2007 Looks like at least a few Republicans were paying attention in November & noticed what mindless toadying can get you.
snuffbox Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Posted February 14, 2007 This could end up being pretty embarassing for both the White House & the people who offered nothing but the exact same talking point rhetoric in their speeches.
Big Ol' Smitty Posted February 14, 2007 Report Posted February 14, 2007 Wow, snuffy. You're totally right about Ron Paul. At least as far as this issue goes.
snuffbox Posted February 14, 2007 Author Report Posted February 14, 2007 Ron Paul bringing the libertarian aspect back to conservatism. Edit - 2 nerds typing at the same time!
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now